Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper, the authors present the solution aimed at increasing reliability of the conveyor units. The analysis of technological and operational defects of conveyor rollers is presented. The changes in manufacturing technology have been proposed, which allowed for avoiding welding and provided the required level of tightness.

Computer simulation of the motion of air in the labyrinth seal of the roller was conducted to determine the numerical parameters of possible airflows. It is proved that the airflow is present in the gap of the labyrinth seal due to the roller rotation. It is shown that the reason for the penetration of abrasive particles through the labyrinth seal after stopping is decompression, which occurred as a result of temperature change and push out of airflows during rotation. It is also suggested that the number of stops during the operation should be taken into account when determining the durability of rollers. Practical recommendations are given for preventing the penetration of abrasive particles during conveyor stops and the need for combined seals. The results can be used for the construction of roller conveyor belts in any industry.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] E.E. Sheshko. Mining transport vehicles and equipment for open work. Publishing House of Moscow State Mining University, Moscow, 2006. (in Russian).
[2] C.A. Wheeler. Rotating resistance of belt conveyor idler rolls. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(4):041009, 2016. doi: 10.1115/1.4031552.
[3] H. Staab, E. Botelho, D.T. Lasko, H. Shah, W. Eakins, and U. Richter. A robotic vehicle system for conveyor inspection in mining. International Conference on Mechatronics, Ilmenau, Germany, 18-20 March, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ICMECH.2019.8722900.
[4] Yu.A. Perten. Conveyor transport of the XXI century. Transport of the Russian Federation, Journal of Science, Practice, Economics, 1:42, 2005. (in Russian).
[5] E.Ya. Shayakhmetov et al. The influence of technological factors on the performance of roller conveyors. Bulletin of KazNTU, 1(107):189, 2015. (in Russian).
[6] B.I. Kogan et al. On the problem of manufacturing roll shells of belt conveyors from a sheet. Bulletin of Kuzbass State Technical University, 2:99, 2007. (in Russian).
[7] T. Opasiak and G. Perun. Influence of construction the rollers c-type on resistance of rotating driven system of the belt conveyor. Diagnostyka, 17(1):81, 2016.
[8] J.D. Mitchell. Bearing seal. U.S. Patent No 2,014,859, 1935.
[9] R.C. Nelson. Labyrinth lubricant seal for belt conveyor roll. U.S. Patent No 4,121,694, 1978.
[10] J. Taylor and A.F Farris, III. Unidirectional labyrinth seal system. U.S. Patent Application No 10/215,282, 2019.
[11] R. Nascimento, R. Carvalho, S. Delabrida, A. Bianchi, R. Oliveira, and L. Garcia. An integrated inspection system for belt conveyor rollers – advancing in an enterprise architecture. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, volume 2, pages 190–200, Porto, Portugal, April, 2017. doi: 10.5220/0006369101900200.
[12] V.V. Gusev et al. Application of modern materials in end seals of mining equipment. Science and Technology to Production, 2:84, 2004. (in Russian).
[13] D. Joachimiak and P. Krzyslak. A model of gas flow with friction in a slotted seal. Archives of Thermodynamics, 37(3):95–108, 2016. doi: 10.1515/aoter-2016-0022.
[14] R. Badykov, S. Falaleev, H. Wood, and A. Vinogradov. Gas film vibration inside dry gas seal gap. In Global Fluid Power Society PhD Symposium, Samara, Russia, 18–20 July, 2018. doi: 10.1109/GFPS.2018.8472383.
[15] H.N. Tang, H. Yao, S.J. Wang, X.S. Meng, H.T. Qiao, and J.H. Qiao. Numerical simulation of leakage rates of labyrinth seal in reciprocating compressor. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 106(1):012015, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/164/1/012015.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

G. Kononov
1
S. Artemov
1
S. Dubrovskyi
2
Dariya Kravtsova
2

  1. Ferrum-Stroy-Servise, Schastye, Lugansk region, Ukraine.
  2. Kryvyi Rih National University, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The presented paper concerns CFD optimization of the straight-through labyrinth seal with a smooth land. The aim of the process was to reduce the leakage flow through a labyrinth seal with two fins. Due to the complexity of the problem and for the sake of the computation time, a decision was made to modify the standard evolutionary optimization algorithm by adding an approach based on a metamodel. Five basic geometrical parameters of the labyrinth seal were taken into account: the angles of the seal’s two fins, and the fin width, height and pitch. Other parameters were constrained, including the clearance over the fins. The CFD calculations were carried out using the ANSYS-CFX commercial code. The in-house optimization algorithm was prepared in the Matlab environment. The presented metamodel was built using a Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network which was trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The Neural Network training and validation were carried out based on the data from the CFD analysis performed for different geometrical configurations of the labyrinth seal. The initial response surface was built based on the design of the experiment (DOE). The novelty of the proposed methodology is the steady improvement in the response surface goodness of fit. The accuracy of the response surface is increased by CFD calculations of the labyrinth seal additional geometrical configurations. These configurations are created based on the evolutionary algorithm operators such as selection, crossover and mutation. The created metamodel makes it possible to run a fast optimization process using a previously prepared response surface. The metamodel solution is validated against CFD calculations. It then complements the next generation of the evolutionary algorithm.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] G. Renner and A. Ekárt. Genetic algorithms in computer aided design. Computer-Aided Design, 35(8):709–726, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00003-4.
[2] V. Schramm. Labyrinth Seals of Maximum Sealing: A Approach to Computer-Based Form Optimization, volume 46. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, 2011. (in German).
[3] W. Wróblewski, S. Dykas, K. Bochon, and S. Rulik. Optimization of tip seal with honeycomb land in LP counter rotating gas turbine engine. Task Quarterly, 14(3):189–207, 2010.
[4] G. Nowak and W. Wróblewski. Cooling system optimisation of turbine guide vane. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29(2-2):567–572, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.03.015.
[5] G. Nowak, W. Wróblewski, and I. Nowak. Convective cooling optimization of a blade for a supercritical steam turbine. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55(17-18):4511– 4520, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.03.072.
[6] G. Nowak and A. Rusin. Shape and operation optimisation of a supercritical steam turbine rotor. Energy Conversion and Management, 74:417–425, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.037.
[7] A. Jahangirian and A. Shahrokhi. Aerodynamic shape optimization using efficient evolutionary algorithms and unstructured CFD solver. Computers & Fluids, 46(1):270–276, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.010.
[8] J. Antony. Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Elsevier, 2nd edition, 2014.
[9] L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, N. Kettaneh-Wold, C. Wikström, and S. Wold. Design of Experiments, Principles and Applications. Umetrics AB, Sweden, 2000.
[10] H.B. Demuth, M.H. Beale, O. De Jess, and M.T. Hagan. Neural Network Design. Martin Hagan, USA, 2nd edition, 2014.
[11] T. Back. Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, 1996.
[12] Z. Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, 1996.
[13] V. Schramm, K. Willenborg, S. Kim, and S. Wittig. Influence of a honeycomb facing on the flow through a stepped labyrinth seal. In ASME Turbo Expo 2000: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, pages V003T01A092–V003T01A092. ASME, 2000. doi: 10.1115/2000-GT-0291.
[14] M.D. Morris. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33(2):161–174, 1991.
[15] B. Iooss and P. Lemaître. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In Dellino G. and Meloni C., editors, Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, chapter 5, pages 101–122. Springer, 2015.
[16] F. Campolongo and J. Cariboni. Sensitivity analysis: How to detect important factors in large models. Technical report, 2007. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/ handle/ JRC37120.
[17] F. Pianosi, F. Sarrazin, and T. Wagener. A Matlab toolbox for global sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 70:80–85, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.009.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Rulik
1
Włodzimierz Wróblewski
1
Daniel Frączek
1

  1. Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Power Engineering and Technology, Gliwice, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more