Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 9
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents a novel strategy of particle filtering for state estimation based on Generalized Gaussian distributions (GGDs). The proposed strategy is implemented with the Gaussian particle pilter (GPF), which has been proved to be a powerful approach for state estimation of nonlinear systems with high accuracy and low computational cost. In our investigations, the distribution which gives the complete statistical characterization of the given data is obtained by exponent parameter estimation for GGDs, which has been solved by many methods. Based on GGDs, an extension of GPF is proposed and the simulation results show that the extension of GPF has higher estimation accuracy and nearly equal computational cost compared with the GPF which is based on Gaussian distribution assumption.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Xifeng Li
Yongle Xie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the design of digital controller for longitudinal aircraft model based on the Dynamic Contraction Method. The control task is formulated as a tracking problem of velocity and flight path angle, where decoupled output transients are accomplished in spite of incomplete information about varying parameters of the system and external disturbances. The design of digital controller based on the pseudo-continuous approach is presented, where the digital controller is the result of continuous-time controller discretization. A resulting output feedback controller has a simple form of a combination of low-order linear dynamical systems and a matrix whose entries depend nonlinearly on certain known process variables. Simulation results for an aircraft model confirm theoretical expectations.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Roman Czyba
Lukasz Stajer
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Active Noise Control (ANC) of noise transmitted through a vibrating plate causes many problems not observed in classical ANC using loudspeakers. They are mainly due to vibrations of a not ideally clamped plate and use of nonlinear actuators, like MFC patches. In case of noise transmission though a plate, nonlinerities exist in both primary and secondary paths. Existence of nonlinerities in the system may degrade performance of a linear feedforward control system usually used for ANC. The performance degradation is especially visible for simple deterministic noise, such as tonal noise, where very high reduction is expected. Linear feedforward systems in such cases are unable to cope with higher harmonics generated by the nonlinearities. Moreover, nonlinearities, if not properly tackled with, may cause divergence of an adaptive control system. In this paper a feedforward ANC system reducing sound transmitted through a vibrating plate is presented. The ANC system uses nonlinear control filters to suppress negative effects of nonlinearies in the system. Filtered-error LMS algorithm, found more suitable than usually used Filtered-reference LMS algorithm, is employed for updating parameters of the nonlinear filters. The control system is experimentally verified and obtained results are discussed.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Mazur
Marek Pawełczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that a real order generalization of the dissipative concepts is a useful tool to determine the stability (in the Lyapunov and in the input-output sense) and to design control strategies not only for fractional order non-linear systems, but also for systems composed of integer and fractional order subsystems (mixed-order systems). In particular, the fractional control of integer order system (e.g. PIλ control) can be formalized. The key point is that the gradations of dissipativeness, passivity and positive realness concepts are related among them. Passivating systems is used as a strategy to stabilize them, which is studied in the non-adaptive as well as in the adaptive case.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J.A. Gallegos
M.A. Duarte-Mermoud
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents a robust model free controller (RMFC) for a class of uncertain continuous-time single-input single-output (SISO) minimum-phase nonaffine-in-control systems. Firstly, the existence of an unknown dynamic inversion controller that can achieve control objectives is demonstrated. Afterwards, a fast approximator is designed to estimate as best as possible this dynamic inversion controller. The proposed robust model free controller is an equivalent realization of the designed fast approximator. The perturbation theory and Tikhonov’s theorem are used to analyze the stability of the overall closed-loop system. The performance of the developped controller are verified experimentally in the position control of a pneumatic actuator system.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ahsene Boubakir
Salim Labiod
Fares Boudjema
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, model reference output feedback tracking control of an aircraft subject to additive, uncertain, nonlinear disturbances is considered. In order to present the design steps in a clear fashion: first, the aircraft dynamics is temporarily assumed as known with all the states of the system available. Then a feedback linearizing controller minimizing a performance index while only requiring the output measurements of the system is proposed. As the aircraft dynamics is uncertain and only the output is available, the proposed controller makes use of a novel uncertainty estimator. The stability of the closed loop system and global asymptotic tracking of the proposed method are ensured via Lyapunov based arguments, asymptotic convergence of the controller to an optimal controller is also established. Numerical simulations are presented in order to demonstrate the feasibility and performance of the proposed control strategy.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] S.N. Balakrishnan and V. Biega: Adaptive-critic-based neural networks for aircraft optimal control. J. of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19(4), (1996), 893–898, DOI : 10.2514/3.21715.
[2] B. Bidikli, E. Tatlicioglu, E. Zergeroglu, and A. Bayrak: An asymptotically stable robust controller formulation for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems with uncertain dynamics. Int. J. of Systems Science, 47(12), (2016), 2913–2924, DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2015.1039627.
[3] B. Bidikli, E. Tatlicioglu, A. Bayrak, and E. Zergeroglu: A new robust integral of sign of error feedback controller with adaptive compensation gain. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Decision and Control, (2013), 3782–3787, DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2013.6760466.
[4] B. Bidikli, E. Tatlicioglu, and E. Zergeroglu: A self tuning RISE controller formulation. In American Control Conf., (2014), 5608–5613, DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2014.6859217.
[5] M. Bouchoucha, M. Tadjine, A. Tayebi, P. Mullhaupt, and S. Bouab- dallah: Robust nonlinear pi for attitude stabilization of a four-rotor miniaircraft: From theory to experiment. Archives of Control Sciences, 18(1), (2008), 99–120.
[6] A.E. Bryson and Yu-Chi Ho: Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control. Hemisphere, Washington, DC, WA, USA, 1975.
[7] Agus Budiyono and Singgih S. Wibowo: Optimal tracking controller design for a small scale helicopter. J. of Bionic Engineering, 4 (2007), 271–280, DOI: 10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60041-9.
[8] Y.N. Chelnokov, I.A. Pankratov, and Y.G. Sapunkov: Optimal reorientation of spacecraft orbit. Archives of Control Sciences, 24(2), (2014), 119–128, DOI: 10.2478/acsc-2014-0008.
[9] W.-H. Chen, D.J. Ballance, P.J. Gawthrop, and J. O’Reilly: A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Tr. on Industrial Electronics, 47(4), (2000), 932–938, DOI: 10.1109/41.857974.
[10] R. Czyba and L. Stajer: Dynamic contraction method approach to digital longitudinal aircraft flight controller design. Archives of Control Sciences, 29(1), (2019), 97–109, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2019.127525.
[11] Z.T. Dydek, A.M. Annaswamy, and E. Lavretsky: Adaptive control and the NASA X-15-3 flight revisited. IEEE Control Systems, 30(3), (2010), 32–48, DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2010.936292.
[12] E.N. Johnson and A.J. Calise: Pseudo-control hedging: a new method for adaptive control. In Workshop on advances in navigation guidance and control technology, pages 1–23, (2000).
[13] H.K. Khalil and J.W. Grizzle: Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
[14] D.E. Kirk: Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction. Dover, 2012.
[15] L.-V. Lai, C.-C. Yang, and C.-J. Wu: Time-optimal control of a hovering quadrotor helicopter. J. of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 45 (2006), 115– 135, DOI: 10.1007/s10846-005-9015-3.
[16] J. Leitner, A. Calise, and JV.R. Prasad: Analysis of adaptive neural networks for helicopter flight control. J. of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20(5), (1997), 972–979, DOI: 10.2514/2.4142.
[17] F.L. Lewis, D. Vrabie, and V.L. Syrmos: Optimal Control. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[18] W. MacKunis: Nonlinear Control for Systems Containing Input Uncertainty via a Lyapunov-based Approach. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2009.
[19] W. MacKunis, P.M. Patre, M.K. Kaiser, and W.E. Dixon: Asymptotic tracking for aircraft via robust and adaptive dynamic inversion methods. IEEE Tr. on Control Systems Technology, 18(6), (2010), 1448–1456, DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2009.2039572.
[20] S. Mishra, T. Rakstad, andW. Zhang: Robust attitude control for quadrotors based on parameter optimization of a nonlinear disturbance observer. J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 141(8), (2019), 081003, DOI: 10.1115/1.4042741.
[21] R.M. Murray: Recent research in cooperative control of multivehicle systems. J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 129 (2007), 571– 583, DOI: 10.1115/1.2766721.
[22] D. Nodland, H. Zargarzadeh, and S. Jagannathan: Neural networkbased optimal adaptive output feedback control of a helicopter UAV. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 24(7), (2013), 1061– 1073, DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2251747.
[23] A. Phillips and F. Sahin: Optimal control of a twin rotor MIMO system using LQR with integral action. In IEEE World Automation Cong., (2014), 114–119, DOI: 10.1109/WAC.2014.6935709.
[24] Federal Aviation Administration. Federal aviation regulations. part 25: Airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes, 2002.
[25] R.R. Costa, L. Hsu, A.K. Imai, and P. Kokotovic: Lyapunov-based adaptive control ofMIMOsystems. Automatica, 39(7), (2003), 1251–1257, DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00085-2.
[26] A.C. Satici, H. Poonawala, and M.W. Spong: Robust optimal control of quadrotor UAVs. IEEE Access, 1 (2013), 79–93, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS. 2013.2260794.
[27] R.F. Stengel: Optimal Control and Estimation. Dover, 1994.
[28] V. Stepanyan and A. Kurdila: Asymptotic tracking of uncertain systems with continuous control using adaptive bounding. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 20(8), (2009), 1320–1329, DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2009.2023214.
[29] B.L. Stevens and F.L. Lewis: Aircraft control and simulation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[30] I. Tanyer, E. Tatlicioglu, and E. Zergeroglu: A robust adaptive tracking controller for an aircraft with uncertain dynamical terms. In IFAC World Cong., (2014), 3202–3207, DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01515.
[31] I. Tanyer, E. Tatlicioglu, and E. Zergeroglu: Neural network based robust control of an aircraft. Int. J. of Robotics& Automation, 35(1), (2020), DOI: 10.2316/J.2020.206-0074.
[32] I. Tanyer, E. Tatlicioglu, E. Zergeroglu, M. Deniz, A. Bayrak, and B. Ozdemirel: Robust output tracking control of an unmanned aerial vehicle subject to additive state-dependent disturbance. IET Control Theory & Applications, 10(14), (2016), 1612–1619, DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.1304.
[33] G. Tao: Adaptive control design and analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[34] Q. Wang and R.F. Stengel: Robust nonlinear flight control of a highperformance aircraft. IEEE Tr. on Control Systems Technology, 13(1), (2005), 15–26, DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2004.833651.
[35] H-N. Wu, M-M. Li, and L. Guo: Finite-horizon approximate optimal guaranteed cost control of uncertain nonlinear systems with application to Mars entry guidance. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 26(7), (2015), 1456–1467, DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2346233.
[36] Q. Xie, B. Luo, F. Tan, and X. Guan: Optimal control for vertical take-off and landing aircraft non-linear system by online kernel-based dual heuristic programming learning. IET Control Theory & Applications, 9(6), (2015), 981–987, DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2013.0889.



Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ilker Tanyer
1
Enver Tatlicioglu
2
Erkan Zergeroglu
3

  1. Gezgini Inc., Folkart Towers, BBuilding, Floor: 36, Office: 3608, Izmir, 35580, Turkey
  2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, 35100, Turkey
  3. Department of Computer Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, 41400, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Model predictive control (MPC) algorithms brought increase of the control system performance in many applications thanks to relatively easily solving issues that are hard to solve without these algorithms. The paper is focused on investigating how to further improve the control system performance using a trajectory of parameters weighting predicted control errors in the performance function of the optimization problem. Different shapes of trajectories are proposed and their influence on control systems is tested. Additionally, experiments checking the influence of disturbances and of modeling uncertainty on control system performance are conducted. The case studies were done in control systems of three control plants: a linear non- minimumphase plant, a nonlinear polymerization reactor and a nonlinear thin film evaporator. Three types of MPC algorithms were used during research: linear DMC, nonlinear DMC with successive linearization (NDMC–SL), nonlinear DMC with nonlinear prediction and linearization (NDMC–NPL). Results of conducted experiments are presented in greater detail for the control system of the polymerization reactor, whereas for the other two control systems only the most interesting results are presented, for the sake of brevity. The experiments in the control system of the linear plant were done as preliminary experiments with the modified optimization problem. In the case of control system of the thin film evaporator the researched mechanisms were used in the control system of a MIMO plant showing possibilities of improving the control system performance.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Nebeluk
Piotr Marusak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper focuses on the global practical Mittag-Leffler feedback stabilization problem for a class of uncertain fractional-order systems. This class of systems is a larger class of nonlinearities than the Lipschitz ones. Based on the quasi-one-sided Lipschitz condition, firstly, we provide sufficient conditions for the practical observer design. Then, we exhibit that practical Mittag-Leffler stability of the closed loop system with a linear, state feedback is attained. Finally, a separation principle is established and we prove that the closed loop system is practical Mittag-Leffler stable.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Imed Basdouri
1
ORCID: ORCID
Souad Kasmi
2
Jean Lerbet
3

  1. Gafsa University, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, Department of Mathematics, Zarroug Gafsa 2112 Tunisia
  2. Sfax University, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Department of Mathematics, BP 1171 Sfax 3000 Tunisia
  3. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et de Modélisation d’Evry, Univ d’Evry, Université Paris Saclay, France

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more