Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the profile of EC (elemental carbon) and OC (organic carbon) temperature fractions in PM1 and PM2.5 samples and in wet deposition samples (material collected on a filter). The research was conducted at the urban background station in Zabrze (southern Poland) in the period of Oct 2020–Oct 2021. PM samples were collected with high-volume samplers; the automatic precipitation collector NSA 181 by Eigenbrodt was used to collect the deposition samples. Concentrations of EC and OC were determined using thermal-optical method (carbon analyzer from Sunset Laboratory Inc., “eusaar_2” protocol). Regardless of the type of research material, organic carbon constituted the dominant part of the carbonaceous matter, and this dominance was more visible in the non-heating season. The profile of temperature fractions of OC and EC was clearly different for dust washed out by precipitation. Noteworthy is a much lower content of pyrolytic carbon (PC) in OC, which can be explained by the fact that PC is most often combined with the water soluble organic carbon. In addition, a high proportion of the OC3 fraction was observed, followed by OC4, which may indicate that these fractions are of a more regional origin. With regard to the EC fractions, the differences are less visible and concern, in particular, the higher share of EC4 and the lower EC2. The obtained results may be a valuable source of information about the actual status of the carbonaceous matter and its transformation in the atmosphere.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Aswini, A.R., Hegde, P., Nair, P.R. & Aryasree, S. (2019). Seasonal changes in carbonaceous aerosols over a tropical coastal location in response to meteorological processes. Sci Total Environ, 656, pp. 1261–1279. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.366.
  2. Bautista VII, A.T., Pabroa, P.C.B., Santos, F.L., Racho, J.M.D. & Quirit, L.L. (2014). Carbonaceous particulate matter characterization in an urban and a rural site in the Philippines. Atmos Pollut Res, 5(2), pp. 245–252. DOI:10.5094/APR.2014.030.
  3. Błaszczak, B. & Mathews, B. (2020). Characteristics of Carbonaceous Matter in Aerosol from Selected Urban and Rural Areas of Southern Poland. Atmosphere, 11(7), 687. DOI:10.3390/atmos11070687.
  4. Cao, J.J., Lee, S.C., Ho, K.F., Zou, S.C., Fung, K., Li, Y., Chow, J.C. & Watson, J.G. (2004). Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region, China. Atmos Environ, 38(27), pp. 4447–4456. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016.
  5. Cao, J.J., Lee, S.C., Ho, K.F., Fung, K., Chow, J.C. & Watson, J.G. (2006). Characterization of roadside fine particulate carbon and its eight fractions in Hong Kong. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 6, 106–122. DOI:10.4209/aaqr.2006.06.0001.
  6. Chow, J.C., Lowenthal, D.H., Chen, L.-W.A., Wang, X. & Watson, J.G. (2015). Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review. Air Qual Atmos Health, 8, pp. 243–263. DOI:10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3.
  7. Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Air quality portal (https://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/current (07.11.2022)).
  8. Dillner, A.M., Phuah, C.H. & Turner, J.R. (2009). Effects of post-sampling conditions on ambient carbon aerosol filter measurement. Atmos Environ, 43, pp. 5937–5943. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.009.
  9. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32008L0050 (23.09.2022)).
  10. EEA (2022). European Environmental Agency, 2022. Air quality in Europe 2022. Web Report (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2022/air-quality-in-europe-2022 (24.11.2022).
  11. EN 12341:2014 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2.5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.
  12. Freney, E.J., Sellegri, K., Canonaco, F., Boulon, J., Hervo, M., Weigel, R., Pichon, J.M., Colomb, A., Prévôt, A.S.H. & Laj, P. (2011). Seasonal variations in aerosol particle composition at the Puy-de-Dôme research station in France. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, pp. 13047–13059. DOI:10.5194/ACP-11-13047-2011.
  13. Karanasiou, A., Minguillón, M.C., Alastuey, A., Putaud, J.-P., Maenhaut, W., Panteliadis, P., Močnik, G., Favez, O. & Kuhlbusch, T.A.J. (2015). Thermal-optical analysis for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) in ambient air a literature review. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Disciss., 8, pp. 9649–9712. DOI:10.5194/amtd-8-9649-2015.
  14. Kim, K.H., Sekiguchi, K., Furuuchi, M. & Sakamoto, K. (2011). Seasonal variation of carbonaceous and ionic components in ultrafine and fine particles in an urban area of Japan. Atmos Environ, 45, pp. 1581–1590. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.037.
  15. Li, H.Z., Dallmann, T.R., Li, X., Gu, P. & Presto, A.A. (2018). Urban organic aerosol exposure: spatial variations in composition and source impacts. Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, pp. 415–426. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b03674.
  16. Lim, S., Lee,, M., Lee, G., Kim, S., Yoon, S. & Kang, K. (2012). Ionic and carbonaceous compositions of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 at Gosan ABC superstation and their ratios as source signature. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, pp. 2007–2024. DOI:10.5194/acp-12-2007-2012.
  17. Michalski, R. & Pecyna-Utylska, P. (2022). Chemical characterization of bulk depositions in two cities of Upper Silesia (Zabrze, Bytom), Poland. Case study. Arch. Environ. Prot., 48(2), pp. 106–116. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2022.140784.
  18. Reizer, M. & Juda-Rezler, K. (2016). Explaining the high PM10 concentrations observed in Polish urban areas. Air Qual. Atmos. Health, 9(5), pp. 517–531. DOI:10.1007/s11869-015-0358-z.
  19. Sahu, M., Hu, S., Ryan, P.H., Le Masters, G., Grinshpun, S.A., Chow, J.C. & Biswas, P. (2011). Chemical compositions and source identification of PM2.5 aerosols for estimation of a diesel source surrogate. Sci Total Environ, 409, pp. 2642–2651. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.032.
  20. dos Santos, D.A.M., Brito, J.F., Godoy, J.M. & Artaxo, P. (2016). Ambient concentrations and insights on organic and elemental carbon dynamics in São Paulo, Brazil. Atmos Environ, 144, pp. 226–233. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.081.
  21. Tohidi, R., Altuwayjiri, A. & Sioutas, C. (2022). Investigation of organic carbon profiles and sources of coarse PM in Los Angeles. Environ Pollut, 314, 120264. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120264.
  22. Vodička, P., Schwarz, J., Cusack, M. & Ždímal, V. (2015). Detailed comparison of OC/EC aerosol at an urban and a rural Czech background site during summer and winter. Sci Total Environ, 518–519, pp. 424–433. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.029.
  23. Zhu, C.-S., Chen, C.-C., Vao, J.-J., Tsai, C.-J., Chou, C.C.-K., Liu, S.-C. & Roam, G.-D. (2010). Characterization of carbon fractions for atmospheric fine particles and nanoparticles in a highway tunnel. Atmos Environ, 44, 2668–2673. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.042.
  24. Zhu, C.-S., Cao, J.-J., Tsai, C.-J., Shen, Z.-X., Han, Y.-M., Liu, S.-X. & Zhao, Z.-Z. (2014). Comparison and implications of PM2.5 carbon fractions in different environments. Sci Total Environ, 466–467, pp. 203–209. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.029.
  25. Zioła, N., Błaszczak, B. & Klejnowski, K. (2021). Temporal Variability of Equivalent Black Carbon Components in Atmospheric Air in Southern Poland. Atmosphere 12, 119. DOI:10.3390/atmos12010119.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Błaszczak
1
Barbara Mathews
1
Krzysztof Słaby
1
Krzysztof Klejnowski
1

  1. Institute of Environmental Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences, Zabrze, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Determining the level of solid pollution in beach sands located near artificial inland water bodies in order to maintain high safety standards is a difficult and expensive task. The tests aimed at determining beach pollution caused by solid wastes through analysis of toxic and chemical concentrations, are time-consuming and usually require several days before the results are available. In addition, the maintenance of the beach area involving beach raking or grooming, and the seasonal replenishment of sand makes it difficult to realistically determine the chemical or bacterial contamination of the tested material. Solid pollutants, such as glass, caps, cans, thick foil, metal, and plastic fragments, pose a greater health risk to beachgoers. The above-mentioned pollutants, especially small ones, are hardly visible on the surface or they are buried at shallow depths. Beach garbage poses a serious threat that can lead to infections from cuts and scratches. These injuries can become infected, further jeopardizing the health and lives of beachgoers due to risks like tetanus, staphylococcus, etc. The authors presented a new petrographic method aimed at assessing the quality of sand by examining the content of solid pollutants. The obtained results allowed us to conclude that the mentioned procedure can be used for a quick quantitative estimation of the content of potentially dangerous and undesirable pollutants in beach sands. Consequently, the method implemented to determent the amount of solid pollutants in beach sands has proven to be a valuable tool for recreational facility administrators, helping them in taking necessary measures to ensure the safety of beach users. Petrographic analysis of beach sands revealed the presence of pollutants of plant origin (0.4–1.8%), plastic (0.1–0.4%), paper (0.1–0.6%), charcoal (0.1–0.5%), glass (0.1–0.4%), metals (0.1–0.4%), rust (0.1–0.3%), ash and slag (0.1–0.3%), and fossil coals (0.1–0.2%).
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Badyda, A., Rogula-Kozłowska, W., Majewski, G., Bralewska, K., Widziewicz-Rzońca, K., Piekarska, B., Rogulski, M. & Bihałowicz, J. (2022). Inhalation risk to PAHs and BTEX during barbecuing: The role of fuel/food type and route of exposure, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 440, 129635, ISSN 0304-3894. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129635.
  2. Cesia, J. Cruz, J., Muñoz-Perez, Maribel I., Carrasco-Braganza, Poullet, P., Lopez-Garcia, P., Contreras, A. & Rodolfo Silva, R. (2020). Beach cleaning costs, Ocean & Coastal Management, 188, 105118, ISSN 0964-5691. DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105118.
  3. Claisse, D. (1989). Chemical contamination of French coasts. The results of a ten years mussel watch. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 20. No. 10, pp. 523-528. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00017/12775/9713.pdf
  4. Contreras-de-Villar, F., García, FJ., Muñoz-Perez, JJ., Contreras-de-Villar, A., Ruiz-Ortiz, V., Lopez, P., Garcia-López, S. & Jigena, B. (2021). Beach leveling using a Remote Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS): Problems and Solutions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 9(1), 19. DOI:10.3390/jmse9010019
  5. Działo, J., Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, P., Mȩkal, A. & Deptuła, W. (2010). Characteristics of mucosal lymphatic tissue associated with gastrointestinal tract and respiratory system. Alergia Astma Immunologia. 15(4). pp. 197-202. http://mediton.nazwa.pl/library/aai_volume-15_issue-4_article-939.pdf
  6. Frolik, A., Gzyl, G. & Kura, K. (2007). Revitalization concepts for sand mine pit in southern Poland: preliminary assessment of impact on aquatic environment. IMWA Symposium 2007: Water in Mining Environments, Cidu, R. & F. Frau (Eds), Cagliari, Italy
  7. García-Morales, G., Arreola-Lizárraga, J.A., Mendoza-Salgado, R.A., García-Hernández, J., Rosales-Grano, P. & Ortega-Rubio, A. (2018). Evaluation of beach quality as perceived by users. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(1), pp. 161-175. DOI:10.1080/09640568.2017.1295924
  8. Halliday, E. & Gast, R.J. (2011). Bacteria in Beach Sands: An Emerging Challenge in Protecting Coastal Water Quality and Bather Health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2, pp. 370–379. DOI:10.1021/es102747s
  9. Holman, M. & Bennett, J. (1973). Determinants of use of water-based recreational facilities. Water Resources Research, 238. DOI:10.1029/WR009i005p01208
  10. ISO 8036, 2015. Microscopes - immersion fluids for light microscopy. https://www.iso.org/standard/67551.html (in Polish)
  11. Labikon, software KS Run nr 0500324, Ihnatowicz J., Manufacture of computers and peripherals - 6310106641.
  12. Li, J. & Zhang, X. (2019). Beach Pollution Effects on Health and Productivity in California. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 1987, 16. DOI:10.3390/ijerph16111987
  13. Marina, V. & Popa, F. (2020). An unusual case of leg wound made by a Sea Shell (Scapharca inaequivalis). International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 67. pp. 127-129. DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.01.039
  14. McLaughlin, E. (2017). Dealing with Marine and Saltwater Infections. World Extreme Medicine. https://worldextrememedicine.com/blog/2017/11/dealing-with-marine-and-saltwater-infections/ (accessed 3 April 2022)
  15. Moran, K. & Webber, J. (2014). Leisure-related injuries at the beach: An analysis of lifeguard incident report forms in New Zealand, 2007–12. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 21,1, pp. 68-74. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2012.760611)
  16. Nowak B. (2019). Threats and water protection of Lake Powidzkie, [in:] Nowak, B. (ed.), Jezioro Powidzkie wczoraj i dziś, IMGW-PIB, Warszawa: 137-150. (in Polish)
  17. Rzętała M. (2008). The functioning of water reservoirs and the course of limnic processes in conditions of various anthropopressure on the example of the Upper Silesian region. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice ISSN 0208-6336 http://www.sbc.org.pl/Content/74082/funkcjonowanie_zbiornikow.pdf, (accessed on 28.03.2022)
  18. Sabino, R., Rodrigues, R., Costa, I., Carneiro, C., Cunha, M., Duarte, A., Faria, N., Ferreira, F.C., Gargaté, M.J., Júlio, C., Martins, M.L., Nevers, M.B., Oleastro, M., Solo-Gabriele, H., Veríssimo, C., Viegas, C., Whitman, R.L. & Brandão, J. (2014). Routine screening of harmful microorganisms in beach sands: Implications to public health. Science of The Total Environment. 472. pp. 1062-1069. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.091
  19. Şanlıtürk, G. & Güran M. (2021). Monitoring of microbiological dynamics in beach sand and seawater samples from recreational and non-recreational beaches over a two-year period. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. pp.1-13. DOI:10.1080/09603123.2021.1931049
  20. Spichler-Moffarah, A., Mohajer, M.A., Hurwitz, B.L. & Armstrong, D.G. (2016). Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Microbiol Spectr. 4(4). DOI:10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0014-2015
  21. Stachowski, P., Kraczkowska, K., Liberacki, D. & Oliskiewicz-Krzywicka, A. (2018). Water reservoirs as an element of shaping water resources of post-mining areas. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 19(4), pp. 217-225. DOI:10.12911/22998993/89658
  22. Suárez-Ruiz, I., Luis, D. & Tomillo, P. (2023). Application of organic petrography as a forensic tool in environmental studies to investigate the source of coal pollution on beaches in Gijón (Northern Spain), International Journal of Coal Geology, 265, 104154. DOI:10.1016/j.coal.2022.104154.
  23. Tomenchok, L.E., Gidley, M.L., Mena, K.D., Ferguson, A.C. & Solo-Gabriele, H.M. (2020). Children’s abrasions in recreational beach areas and a review of possible wound infections. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(11), 4060. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17114060
  24. WHO (2003). Guidelines for safe recreational water environments: Coastal and fresh waters (Vol. 1). pp. 128-129. World Health Organization
  25. WHO (2021). Guidelines on recreational water quality. Volume 1 Coastal and Fresh Waters. pp. 3. World Health Organization
  26. Wufuer, R., Duo, J., Li, W., Fan, J. & Pan, X. (2021). Bioremediation of uranium- and nitrate-contaminated groundwater after the in situ leach mining of uranium. Water 13, 3188. DOI:10.3390/w13223188
  27. Wulai, X., Qingyang, R., Xuwei, D., Jun, Ch. & Ping, X. (2020). Rainfall is a significant environmental factor of microplastic pollution in inland waters, Science of The Total Environment, 732, 139065. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139065.
  28. Zielinski, S., Botero, C.M. & Yanes, A. (2019). To clean or not to clean? A critical review of beach cleaning methods and impacts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 139. pp. 390-401. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.12.027
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sebastian Kuś
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zbigniew Jelonek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Iwona Jelonek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Edyta Sierka
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present work is aimed at geometrical optimization and optical analysis of a small-sized parabolic trough collector (PTC). Improving the performance of parabolic trough collectors can greatly justify the use of solar energy. An optimized curvature geometry, the location of the absorber tube, and the heat flux distribution along the circumference of the absorber tube are major features in the geometric optimization and optical modelling of parabolic trough collectors. Rim angle, aperture width, the diameter of the absorber tube, receiver position, and the optimum value of heat flux are the major parameters considered in this work for geometrical and optical analysis. The Monte Carlo ray tracing method has been adopted for analysis. The non-uniform heat flux distribution profile obtained from optical analysis of the proposed parabolic trough collector has been compared with the profile available in the literature, and good agreement has been obtained, which proves the feasibility and reliability of the model and method used for this study. An experimental new small-sized parabolic trough collector has been fabricated for the optimized rim angle of 90 deg after a successful laser light feasibility test. The effect of the absorber tube position along the optical axis on the heat flux profile was analysed and found to be substantial. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of the parabolic trough collector using the software applied has been discussed separately.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Raman Kumar Singh
1
Prakash Chandra
1

  1. National Institute of Technology Patna, Department of MechanicalEngineering, Bihar 800005, India

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more