1. Almack, Kathryn. 2011. Display Work: Lesbian Parent Couples and Their Families of Origin Negotiating New Kin Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 102–118.
2. Barnwell, Ashley, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Signe Ravn. 2021. Capured and Captioned. Representing Family life on Instagram. New Media & Society, 00, 0: 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211012791.
3. Barve, Gargi. 2016. Social Media and its Effects on Society. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 3, 1: 1–5. DOI: 10.4172/2469-9837.1000166.
4. Biehal, Nina. 2014. A Sense of Belonging: Meanings of Family and Home in Long-Term Foster Care. British Journal of Social Work, 44: 955–971. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs177.
5. Boccagni, Paolo. 2012. Practising Motherhood at a Distance: Retention and Loss in Ecuadorian Transnational Families. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 2: 261–277. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.646421.
6. Buler, Marta, Paula Pustułka. 2020. Dwa pokolenia Polek o praktykach rodzinnych. Między ciągłością a zmianą. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 69, 2: 33–53. DOI: 10.26485/PS/2020/69.2/2.
7. Cabalquinto, Earvin C. 2019. They could picture me, or I could picture them: Displaying of family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information, Communication & Society, 23, 11: 1608–1624. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602663.
8. Cammu, Nola. 2021. “We Are Three Parents but Legally Two”: Absent Legality, Present Display. Journal of Family Issues, 42, 5: 1007–1028. DOI: 10.1177/01925I3X20983379.
9. Chambers, Deborah. 2012. ‘We play as a family’: the rise in family-centered video gaming. Leisure Studies, 31, 1: 69–82. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2011.568065.
10. Dermott, Esther, Julie Seymour, eds. 2011. Displaying Families. A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Dermott, Esther, Marco Pomati. 2016. ‘Good’ Parenting Practices: How Important are Poverty, Education and Time Pressure? Sociology, 50, 1: 125–142. DOI: 10.1177/0038038514560260.
12. Doucet, Andrea. 2011. It’s Just Not Good For a Man to be Interested in Other People’s Children: Fathers, Public Displays of Care and Relevant Others. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–101.
13. Evans, David. 2012. Beyond the Throwaway Society: Ordinary Domestic Practice and a Sociological Approach to Household Food Waste. Sociology, 46, 1: 41–56. DOI: 0.1177/0038038511416150.
14. Featherstone, Brid, Susan White, Kate Morris. 2014. Re-imagining Child Protection: Towards Humane Social Work with Families. Clifton, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
15. Finch, Janet. 2007. Displaying Families. Sociology, 41, I: 65–81. DOI: 10.1177/0038038507072284.
16. Finch, Janet. 2011. Exploring the Concept of Display in Family Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 197–205.
17. Gabb, Jacqui. 2008. Research Intimacy in Families. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Gabb, Jacqui. 2012. Embodying Risk: Managing Father-Child Intimacy and the Display of Nudityin Families. Sociology, 47, 4: 639–654. DOI: 10.1177/0038038512448558.
19. Gawrońska, Małgorzata. 2021. Zastosowanie koncepcji displaying families do analizy wizualnych reprezentacji macierzyństwa na portal Instagram. Fabrica Societatis, 4: 46–62. DOI: 10.34616/142703.
20. Goulden, Murray. 2021. ‘Delete the family’: platform families and the colonisation of the smart home. Information, Communication & Society, 24, 7: 903–920. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668454.
21. Harding, Lindsey. 2016. Motherhood Reimag(in)ed: A study of domestic photography in the digital age. Photographies, 9, 1: 109–125. DOI: 10.1080/175/40763.2016.1146628.
22. Harman, Vicki, Benedetta Cappellini. 2015. Mothers on Display: Lunchboxes, Social Class and Moral Accountability. Sociology, 49, 4: 764–781. DOI: 10.1177/0038038514559322.
23. Harrington, Maureen. 2015. Practices and meaning of purposive family leisure among working- and middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 34, 4: 471–486. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2014.938767.
24. Haynes, Jo, Esther Dermott. 2011. Displaying Mixedness: Differences and Family Relationships. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 145–159.
25. Heaphy, Brian. 2011. Critical relational displays. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–37.
26. Henze-Pedersen, Sofie, Margaretha Jarvinen. 2021. Displaying family at women’s refuge. Sociological Review, 69, 6: 1229–1243. DOI: 10.1177/00380261211034670.
27. James, Allison, Penny Curtis. 2010. Family Displays and Personal Lives. Sociology, 44, 6: 1163–1180. DOI: 10.1177/0038038510381612.
28. Jones, Chris, Simon Hackett. 2011. The Role of ‘Family Practices’ and ‘Displays of Family’ in the Creation of Adoptive Kinship. British Journal of Social Work, 41: 40–56. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs177.
29. Kehily, Mary J., Rachel Thomson. 2011. Displaying Motherhood: Representations, Visual Methods and the Materiality of Maternal Practice. In: J. Seymour, E. Dermott, eds. Displaying families: a new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–80.
30. Kędra, Joanna. 2021. Virtual proximity and transnational familyhood: a case study of the digital communication practices of Poles living in Finland. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42, 5: 462–474. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1839084.
31. Khamis, Susie, Lawrence Ang, Raymond Welling. 2017. Self-branding, micro-celebrity and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8, 2: 191–208. DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2016.121892.
32. Lahad, Kinnereth, Vanessa May. 2021. Holding back and hidden family displays: Reflections on aunthood as a morally charged category. Current Sociology, 00, 0: 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/0011392121992829.
33. Lahad, Kinnereth, Galia Sabar, Naama Sabar Ben-Yehoshua. 2018. Doing and Displaying Gendered Boundary Work among Blended Families in Israel. Sociology, 52, 1: 95–110. DOI: 10.1177/0038038516677220.
34. Lind, Judith, Cecilia Lindgren. 2017. Displays of parent suitability in adoption assessment reports. Child and Family Social Work, 22: 53–63. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12305.
35. Mamali, Elizabeth, Lorna Stevens. 2020. When Same-Sex Couples Say ‘I Do’: Display Work and the (Re)Production of the Wedding Rite. Sociology, 54, 5: 987–1003. DOI: 10.1177/0038038520922523.
36. Mizielińska, Joanna, Agata Stasińska. 2014. Prywatne jest polityczne: strategie emancypacyjne rodzin z wyboru w Polsce. Studium wybranych przypadków. Studia Socjologiczne, 4, 215: 111–140.
37. Mizielińska Joanna, Marta Abramowicz, Agata Stasińska. 2014. Rodziny z wyboru w Polsce. Życie rodzinne osób nieheteroseksualnych. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii PAN.
38. Morgan, David H.J. 1996. Family Connections. An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. Morgan, David H.J. 2011a. Locating „Family Practices”. Sociological Research Online, 16, 4, 14: 1–9. https://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/4/14.html [dostęp: 22.08.2021].
40. Morgan, David H.J. 2011b. Rethinking Family Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
41. Morris, Kate. 2013. Troubled families: vulnerable families’ experiences of multiple service use. Child&Family Social Work, 18, 2: 198–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2206.2011.00822.x.
42. May, Vanessa, Matt Dawson. 2018. Families and Relationships e-Special Issue Introduction. Sociology, 52, 4: 865–874. DOI: 10.1177/0038038518760427.
43. Nicolini, Davide. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Nordqvist, Petra. 2012. ‘I don’t want us to stand out more than we already do’: Lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities, 15, 5/6: 644–661. DOI: 10.1177/1363460712446271.
45. Olcoń-Kubicka, Marta. 2009. Rola Internetu w powstawaniu nowego modelu macierzyństwa. W: M. Sikorska, red. Być rodzicem we współczesnej Polsce. Nowe wzory konfrontacji z rzeczywistością. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 34–61.
46. Parsons, Talcott, Robert Freed Bales. 1955. Family Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
47. Pilcher, Jane, Zara Hooley, Amanda Coffey. 2020. Names and naming in adoption: Birth heritage and family-making. Child & Family Social Work, 25, 3: 568–575. DOI: 1111/cfs.12728.
48. Power, Emma. 2008. Furry families: making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 5: 535–555. DOI: 10.1080/14649360802217790.
49. Pugh, Allison J. 2005. Selling Compromise: Toys, Motherhood, and the Cultural Deal. Gender and Society, 19, 6: 729–749. DOI: 10.1177/0891243205279286.
50. Pustułka, Paula, Magdalena Ślusarczyk. 2016. Cultivation, compensation and indulgence: Transnational short-term returns to Poland across three family generations. TransnationalSocialReview,6,1–2:78–92.DOI:10.1080/21931674.2016.1182312.
51. Reckwitz, Andreas 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2: 243–263.
52. Rose, Gillian. 2010. Doing Family Photography. The Domestic, The Public and The Politics of Sentiment. Surrey: Asghate Publishing Limited.
53. Rose, Gillian. 2014. How Digital Technologies Do Family Snaps, Only Better. In: J. Larsen, M. Sandbye, eds. Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. London: Routledge, 67–86.
54. Schatzki, Theodore. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In: T. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, E. von Savigny, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 10–23.
55. Schatzki, Theodore. 2012. A primer on practices: Theory and research. In: J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, F. Trede, eds. Practice-Based Education. Perspectives and Strategies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 13–26.
56. Schmidt, Filip, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Magdalena Żadkowska, Joanna Jasińska, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. W stronę socjologii pary: propozycja paradygmatu teoretyczno-badawczego. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 11–39. DOI: 10.24425/122471.
57. Seymour, Julie. 2015. More than putting on a performance in commercial homes: merging family practices and critical hospitality studies. Annals of Leisure Research, 18, 3: 414–430. DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2015.1078247.
58. Seymour, Julie, Julie Walsch. 2013. Displaying Families, Migrant Families and Community Connectedness: The Application of an Emerging Concept in Family Life. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44, 6: 689–698. DOI: 10.3138/ jcfs.44.6.689.
59. Shannon, Charlene S. 2019. #Family: Exploring the Display of Family and Family Leisure on Facebook and Instagram. Leisure Sciences (online). DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2019.1597792.
60. Shannon, Charlene S. 2021. Constructing “family”. Leisure as a context for “doing” and “displaying” family. In: D. Trussell, E, R. Jeanes, eds. Families, Sport, Leisure and Social Justice. London: Routledge, 18–29.
61. Share, Michelle, Cayla Williams, Liz Kerrins. 2018. Displaying and performing: Polish transnational families in Ireland Skyping grandparents in Poland. New Media & Society, 20, 8: 3011–3028. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817739272.
62. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practices. London: Sage Publications.
63. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2018. Teorie praktyk jako alternatywa dla badań nad rodziną prowadzonych w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 2, 229: 31–63. DOI: 10.24425/122463.
64. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2019. Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce – rekonstrukcja codzienności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
65. Smart, Carol. 2008. “Can I Be Bridesmaid?” Combining the Personal and Political in Same-SexWeddings. Sexualities,11,6:761–776.DOI:10.1177/1363460708096917.
66. Taranowicz, Iwona. 2016. Jemy wspólnie niedzielne obiady, więc jesteśmy rodziną – o znaczeniu demonstrowania praktyk rodzinnych w tworzeniu rodziny. Societas Communitas, 1, 21: 251–256.
67. Tarrant, Anna. 2012. Grandfathering: the construction of new identities and masculinities. In: S. Arber, V. Timonen, eds. Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships in global contexts. Bristol: Policy Press, 181–202.
68. Underwood, Carrie R., Rachel D. Robnett. 2021. “I Would Like Us to Share a Name so That We Can Be Recognized in Society.” Marital Surname Preferences in Same-Sex Relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 68, 2: 290–310. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1651110.
69. Ursin, Marit, Siv Oltedal, Carolina Munoz. 2016. Recognizing the ‘big things’ and the ‘little things’ in child protection cases. Child & Family Social Work, 22: 932–941. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12313.
70. Walsh, Julie C. 2018. Migrant family display: a strategy for achieving recognition and validation in the host country. Sociological Research Online, 23, 1: 67–83. DOI: 10.1177/1360780417747286.
71. Watson, Ash, Deborah Lupton, Mike Michael. 2021. Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: the sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 178, 1: 136–150. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X20961568.
72. White, James M., David M. Klein. 2008. Family Theories. London: Sage Publications.
73. Van Driel, Loes, Delia Dumitrica. 2020. Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalisation of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, XX, X: 1–19. DOI: 10.1177/1354856520902136.
74. Zadeh, Sophie, Susan Imrie, Susan Golombok. 2021. Storiesof Samenessand Difference: The Views and Experiences of Children and Adolescents with a trans*Parent. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 17, 1: 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/1550428X.2019.1683785.
75. Żadkowska, Magdalena, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Jacek Gądecki, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Filip Schmidt, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. Metodologiczne aspekty jakościowych badań par – synteza doświadczeń terenowych. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 41–69. DOI: 10.24425/122472.

1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. New York: Cambridge Unviersity Press.
2. Bartiaux, Françoise, Luis Salmón. 2014. Family Dynamics and Social Practice Theories: An Investigation of Daily Practices Related to Food, Mobility, Energy Consumption, and Tourism. Nature and Culture, 9. DOI: 10.3167/nc.2014.090206.
3. Bottero, Wendy. 2015. Practising Family History: ‘Identity’ as a Category of Social Practice. The British Journal of Sociology, 66, 3: 534–56. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12133.
4. Browne, Alison L. 2016. Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area, 48, 2: 198–205. DOI: 10.1111/area.12250
5. Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oak: Sage Publications, Inc.
6. Dant, Tim. 2005. Materiality and society. New York: Open University Press.
7. Eerola, Petteri, Johanna Närvi, Johanna Terävä, Katja Repo. 2021. Negotiating Parenting Practices: The Arguments and Justifi of Finnish Couples. Families, Relationships and Societies, 10, 1:119–35. DOI: 10.1332/204674320X15898834533942.
8. Epp, Amber M., Hope Jensen Schau, Linda Price. 2014. The Role of Brands and Mediating Technologies in Assembling Long-Distance Family Practices. Journal of Marketing, 78, 3: 81–101. DOI: 10.1509/jm.12.0196.
9. Finch, Janet. 2007. Displaying Families. Sociology, 41, 1: 65–81. DOI: 10.1177/0038038507072284.
10. Giustini, Deborah. 2019. A praxeological and methodological quest: Capturing invisible expertise. Practice Theory Methodologies. Pobrano 2 lipca 2023 (https://practicetheorymethodologies.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/deborah-giustini-a-praxeological-and-methodological-quest-capturing-invisible-expertise/).
11. Gouveia, Rita, Anna-Maija Castrén. 2021. Redefining the Boundaries of Family and Personal Relationships. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe. A.-M. Castrén, V. Česnuitytė, I. Crespi, J.-A. Gauthier, R. Gouveia, C. Martin, A. Moreno Mínguez, K. Suwada, eds. Cham: Springer, 259–277.
12. Hand, Martin, Elisabeth Shove. 2007. Condensing practices. Ways of living with a freezer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7, 1. DOI: 10.1177/1469540507073509.
13. Halkier, Bente. 2020. Social Interaction as Key to Understanding the Intertwining of Routinized and Culturally Contested Consumption. Cultural Sociology, 14, 4: 399–416. DOI: 10.1177/1749975520922454.
14. Halkier, Bente, Tally Katz-Gerro, Lydia Martens. 2011. Applying Practice Theory to the Study of Consumption: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 1: 3–13. DOI: 10.1177/1469540510391765.
15. Hitchings, Russell. 2012. People can talk about their practices. Area, 44, 1: 61–67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762. 2011.01060.
16. Jamieson, Lynn. 2011. Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16, 4. DOI: 10.5153/sro.2497.
17. Joas, Hans, Wolfgang Knoebl. 2004. Sozialtheorie. Suhrkamp Verlag: Frankfurt am Mein.
18. Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 1999. Mit Leib und Seele: Theorie der Haushaltstätgkeit. UVK, Univ.-Verlag Konstanz.
19. Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 2004. Ego: socjologia jednostki. Przekład Krzysztof Wakar. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
20. Kent, Jennifer L. 2022. The Use of Practice Theory in Transport Research. Transport Reviews, 42, 2: 222–44. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2021.1961918.
21. Leger, Matthias. 2023. The Same but Different. On the Possibilities of Combining Practice Theory and Situational Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24: 1–21.
22. Marody, Mirosława, Anna Giza-Poleszczuk. 2006. Przemiany więzi społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
23. Martens, Lydia, Sue Scott. 2017. Understanding Everyday Kitchen Life: Looking at Performance, into Performances and for Practices In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer, 177–191.
24. McKie, Linda, Susan Gregory, Sophia Bowlby. 2002. Shadow Times: The Temporal and Spatial Frameworks and Experiences of Caring and Working. Sociology, 36, 4: 897–924. DOI: 10.1177/003803850203600406.
25. McKie, Linda, Sarah Cunnigham-Burley. 2005. Families in socjety: boundaries and relationships. Boston University Press.
26. Mizielińska, Joanna, Agata Stasińska. 2017. Beyond the Western Gaze: Families of Choice in Poland. Sexualities, 21, 4. DOI: 10.1177/1363460717718508.
27. Morgan, David. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. 1 edition. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge, MA: Polity.
28. Morgan, David. 2011a. Rethinking Family Practices. Springer.
29. Morgan, David H. J. 2011b. Locating ‘Family Practices’. Sociological Research Online, 16 (4) 14. DOI: 10.5153/sro.2535.
30. Morgan, David H. J. 2020. Family Practices in Time and Space. Gender, Place & Culture, 27, 5: 733–43. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1541870.
31. Müller, Sophie Merit. 2017. Beyond the Body’s Skin. Describing the Embodiment of Practices. In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 127–143.
32. Nicolini, Davide. 2013. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. First Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Nicolini, Davide. 2017. Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary: Affordances and Limitations. In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 19–34.
34. Pichelstorfer, Anna. 2017. (Re)Configuring Actors in Practice. In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 79–92.
35. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2: 243–63. DOI: 10.1177/13684310222225432.
36. Rinkinen, Jenny, Mattijs Smits. 2016. Jenny Rinkinen & Mattijs Smits – What Do You Need to Know about Practices (in Other Countries)? Practice Theory Methodologies. Pobrano 2 lipca 2023 (https://practicetheorymethodologies.wordpress.com/2016/11/18/jenny-rinkinen-mattijs-smits-what-do-you-need-to-know-about-practices-in-other-countries/).
37. Schäfer, Hilmar. 2017. Relationality and Heterogeneity: Transitive Methodology in Practice Theory and Actor-Network Theory. In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 35–46.
38. Schatzki, Theodore R. 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Penn State University Press.
39. Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press.
40. Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin Knorr-Cetina, Eike von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Psychology Press.
41. Schmidt, Filip. 2006. Socjologia ciała: korzenie i wybrane wątki, praca magisterska pod kier. Marka Krajewskiego, UAM: Poznań.
42. Schmidt, Filip, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Magdalena Żadkowska, Joanna Jasińska, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. W stronę socjologii pary: propozycja paradygmatu teoretyczno-badawczego. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 11–39. DOI: 10.24425/122471.
43. Sedlačko, Michal. 2017. Conducting Ethnography with a Sensibility for Practice. In: Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, M. Jonas, B. Littig, A. Wroblewski, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 47–60.
44. Shove, Elizabeth. 2017. Practice Theory Methodologies Do Not Exist. Practice Theory Methodologies. Pobrano 2 lipiec 2023 (https://practicetheorymethodologies.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/elizabeth-shove-practice-theory-methodologies-do-not-exist/).
45. Shove, Elisabeth, Mika Pantzar. 2005. Consumers, Producers and Practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 1: 43–64. DOI: 10.1177/1469540505049846.
46. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Los Angeles: SAGE.
47. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2018. Teorie praktyk jako alternatywa dla badań nad rodziną prowadzonych w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 2: 31–63. DOI: 10.24425/122463.
48. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2019. Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
49. Smagacz-Poziemska, Marta, Andrzej Bukowski, Natalia Martini. 2021. Social practice research in practice. Some methodological challenges in applying practicebased approach to the urban research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24, 1: 65–78. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1760577.
50. Stasińska, Agata. 2018. Socjologia pary. Praktyki intymne w związkach nieheteroseksualnych. Kraków: Nomos.
51. Szacki, Jerzy. 1975. Wprowadzenie. W: Elementy teorii socjologicznych. Materiały do dziejów współczesnej socjologii zachodniej, W. Derczyński, A. Jasińska-Kania, J. Szacki, red. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
52. Turner, Bryan S. 1996. Body and society. Explorations in Social Theory. Blackwell: Oxford.
53. Warde, Alan. 2005. Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 2:131–53. DOI: 10.1177/1469540505053090.
54. Warde, Alan. 2014. After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, 3: 279–303. DOI: 10.1177/1469540514547828.
55. Welch, Daniel. 2017. Behaviour Change and Theories of Practice: Contributions, Limitations and Developments. Social Business, 7, 3: 241–61. DOI: 10.1362/2044408 17X15108539431488.
56. Welch, Daniel, Bente Halkier, Margit Keller. 2020. Introduction to the Special Issue: Renewing Theories of Practice and Reappraising the Cultural. Cultural Sociology, 14, 4: 325–39. DOI: 10.1177/1749975520954146.
57. Widmer, Eric D. 2021. The Configurational Approach to Families: Methodological Suggestions. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe. A.-M. Castrén, V. Česnuitytė, I. Crespi, J.-A. Gauthier, R. Gouveia, C. Martin, A. Moreno Mínguez, K. Suwada, eds. Cham: Springer, 107–131.
58. Żadkowska, Magdalena, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka, Jacek Gądecki, Joanna Mizielińska, Agata Stasińska, Filip Schmidt, Mateusz Halawa. 2018. Metodologiczne aspekty jakościowych badań par – synteza doświadczeń terenowych. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 230: 41–69. DOI: 10.24425/122472.