Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies
Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies) is a semi-annual journal devoted to linguistics, literature, history, culture, religion as well as societies of Asia and Africa. Many publications are editions of texts written in Oriental fonts. Articles are published in English, German or French with summaries in English. There is no word limit for the article but it should be concise. Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies) is a highly esteemed journal in the field, one of the oldest in the world, and the oldest in Poland (it was founded in 1914). The journal is indexed in Scopus. Scoring assigned by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education: 70 points
Japanese literature has been known in Poland at least since the end of
the 19th century, when first translations were made of Japanese prose
and poetry (although via English or other languages). I consider the
first translation made directly from Japanese into Polish language a
short story by Kikuchi Kan, entitled Tusz ('Ink'), published in
April of 1939, in a monthly magazine "Echoes from Far East." In the same
magazine we can find also many examples of stories and poetry written
not by Japanese, but by Polish authors, fascinated with Japan and its
culture. Works by the same authors: Maria Juszkiewiczowa, Aleksander
Janowski, Antoni Kora, Leon Rygier, Remigjusz Kwiatkowski and others
were published also in other newspapers and magazines, and as separate
novel books. While some short mentions about the earliest translations
may be found in books on Japanese literature and contacts between Poland
and Japan, novels, stories and poems written originally by Polish
authors inspired by Japan are now all but forgotten. Hardly any of them
were published again after World War II and they are not to be found in
regular libraries. In the present paper I concentrate on the forgotten
jewels of Polish prose (and to some extent poetry and drama) based on
Japanese themes, published before World War II.
Rocznik Orientalistyczny / Yearbook of Oriental Studies Faculty of Oriental Studies University of Warsaw Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28 00-927 Warsaw 64 Publishers: The Committee of Oriental Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28 00-927 Warsaw, Poland e-mail: kno@pan.pl The Publishing House ELIPSA Inflancka 15/198 00-189 Warsaw, Poland e-mail: sklep@elipsa.pl
Prof. Marek M. Dziekan (Editor-in-Chief) e-mail: marek.dziekan@wsmip.uni.lodz.pl
Dr hab. Marta Woźniak-Bobińska (Secretary) e-mail: marta.wozniak@wsmip.uni.lodz.pl
Editorial Board:
Marek M. Dziekan (Editor-in-Chief), University of Lodz, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0003-0291-2997
Marek M. Dziekan is Full Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies at the University of Łódź and at the University of Warsaw (Poland). He holds a position of the Head of the Department of Middle East and North Africa, University of Łódź. His main interests cover history of Islam, history of Arabic culture and literature, contemporary Islam in political context, Islam-West relations, ideologies of Arabic World and anthropology of Arabic World. His selected books (in Polish) are: “Arabia Magica. The Recondite Wisdom among the Arabs in pre-Islamic Times”, 1993; “Arabo-Islamic Symbols”, 1997; “Iraq. Religion and Politics”, 2005; “Civilization of Islam in Asia and Africa”, 2007; “History of Arabic Culture”, 2008; “Golden Capitals of the Arabs. Essays on Contemporary Arab Thought”, 2011. Prof. Dziekan is a vice-President of Polish Oriental Society and a member of Polish Society of Political Sciences, Union Europeenne des Arabisants et Islamisants, Warsaw Society of Sciences, Committee for Oriental Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences (Vice-President).
Marta Woźniak-Bobińska (Secretary), University of Lodz, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0003-2695-047X
Kevin Blankinship, Brigham Young University, USA, ORCID: 0000-0003-4296-445X
Jean-Charles Ducène, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Sorbonne, Paris, France, ORCID: 0000-0003-4662-7311
Ehab Galal, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, ORCID: 0000-0001-9656-5038
Agata Bareja-Starzyńska, University of Warsaw, Poland, , ORCID: 0000-0003-4022-6226
Nathan W. Hill, The University of Dublin, Ireland, ORCID: 0000-0001-6423-017X
Galina Miškinienė, Vilnius University, Lithuania, ORCID: 0000-0003-1394-1259
Erzsébet N. Rózsa, Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary, ORCID: 0000-0002-4225-7926
Lidia Sudyka, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0002-7014-8241
Gábor Takacs, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary - em., ORCID: 0000-0002-2466-6451
Ewa Zajdler, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0002-2640-9029
Advisory Board:
Roswitha Badry, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Ágnes Birtalan, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary, ORCID: 0000-0002-8263-858X
Janusz Danecki, University of Warsaw, Poland
Vincent Eltschinger, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Sorbonne, Paris, France, ORCID: 0000-0002-0312-5971
Lidia Kasarełło, University of Warsaw, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0002-9206-6300
Agnieszka Kozyra, University of Warsaw, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0001-7977-7987
Edward Lipiński, Catholic University, Lewuven, Belgium - em.
Alfred F. Majewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland - em.
Mustafa Menshawy, Lancaster University, UK, ORCID: 0000-0003-0092-1638
Ahmad Z. Obiedat, Wake Forest University, USA, ORCID: 0000-0002-4521-0883
Julian Rentzsch, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany, ORCID: 0000-0003-1472-8046
Johannes Schneider, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, München, Germany
Maria Szuppe, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
Piotr Taracha, University of Warsaw, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0003-4246-2281
Przemysław W. Turek, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0001-7333-160X
Witold Witakowski, Uppsala University, Sweden - em.
Beata Wójtowicz, University of Warsaw, Poland, ORCID: 0000-0002-8819-3219
Mykhaylo Yakubovych, The National University of Ostroh Academy, Ukraine, ORCID: 0000-0002-8305-1166
Instrukcje dla autorów W czasopiśmie publikowane są przede wszystkim oryginalne artykuły. Złożenie artykułu w redakcji drogą elektroniczną jest równoznaczne z oświadczeniem Autora(ów), że praca nie była dotychczas publikowana i nie jest zgłoszona do publikacji w żadnym innym czasopiśmie. Autorzy przyjmują także odpowiedzialność za uzgodnienie wszystkich praw do jej zgłoszenia. Wszystkie nadesłane do redakcji artykuły oceniane są przez dwóch niezależnych recenzentów spośród autorytetów uznanych w danej dyscyplinie. Recenzenci zostają poproszeni o wykonanie recenzji, otrzymują tekst artykułu (bez danych personalnych autorów) oraz formularz recenzji, w uzasadnionych przypadkach poszerzony o dodatkowe pytania dotyczące artykułu. Czas oczekiwania na recenzje wynosi od 1 do 6 miesięcy. Po zakończeniu procesu recenzowania Autorzy są informowani o jego wynikach oraz – jeżeli obie recenzje są pozytywne – proszeni o naniesienie sugerowanych poprawek. O przyjęciu pracy do druku decydują opinie niezależnych recenzentów i akceptacja redakcji. INSTRUKCJA DLA AUTORÓW „Rocznika Orientalistycznego” - Każdy nadesłany materiał zostanie poddany recenzji, kwalifikującej tekst do publikacji. Zarówno nazwiska recenzentów, jak i rezultaty ich pracy są danymi poufnymi Redakcji. - „RO” prosi o nadesłanie wraz z publikacją wszystkich niestandardowych czcionek w niej użytych oraz, pliku w formacie *.doc, *.docx, a w uzasadnionych przypadkach także jako *.pdf. - Przyjmujemy teksty w językach angielskim, niemieckim i francuskim. - Całość tekstu powinna składać się z nagłówka tytułowego w języku angielskim (w przypadku artykułów po niemiecku lub francusku, również nagłówka w tych językach), tekstu głównego, słów kluczowych (4-10) i abstraktu w j. angielskim (od 150 do 200 słów). - Autorzy proszeni są o podanie swojej afiliacji, numeru ORCID oraz przygotowanie bibliografii załącznikowej (na końcu artykułu). W bibliografii, podobnie jak w przypisach, wolno używać wyłącznie liter łacińskich. - Autor zapewnia, że posiada stosowne zezwolenia na reprodukowanie w swoim artykule cudzych materiałów. Autor oświadcza, że nadesłany tekst nie był wcześniej w żadnej formie opublikowany, co dotyczy również publikacji w innym języku. Redakcja informuje jednocześnie, że zarówno „ghostwriting”, jak i „guest authorship” są przejawem nierzetelności naukowej, a wszelkie wykryte przypadki będą demaskowane, włącznie z powiadomieniem odpowiednich podmiotów. - Zgłaszając artykuł do „Rocznika Orientalistycznego” Autor jednoznacznie wyraża zgodę na udzielenie autorskiej licencji eksploatacyjnej do nadesłanego tekstu (dot. postaci drukowanej i/lub elektronicznej), co obejmuje prawo Redakcji do: kopiowania, publikacji, reprodukcji, cytowania, umieszczenia w formie elektronicznej w bazach danych, itp., itd. Czas trwania udzielonej licencji jest zgodny z dyrektywą UE. Licencja zostaje udzielona "Rocznikowi Orientalistycznemu" nieodpłatnie. - Autor otrzymuje 2 egz. numeru "Rocznika Orientalistycznego" w przypadku artykułu i 1 egz. w przypadku recenzji. - Redakcja zastrzega sobie prawo do skracania i redagowania złożonych tekstów. - Po przyjęciu tekstu do druku i zredagowaniu Autor otrzyma drogą elektroniczną tekst do korekty, którą jest zobowiązany uczynić i odesłać do Redakcji w możliwie najszybszym terminie.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS OF Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies - Submitted papers will be subject to peer review by appropriate referees. The names of the reviewers and the results of their work are confidential data. - The Publisher accepts complete scripts of the Work in *.doc. *.docx in addition to *.pdf format. All the special fonts used by the Author should be sent as an attachment to the text. - We accept articles written in English, German, French and Russian. - Every text should consist of a title, main body text, keywords (4-10), and an abstract in English (150 to 200 words). - The Authors should provide their ORCID number as well as end of article bibliography. - By submitting the text, the Author warrants to the Publisher: 1. That the Author is the sole author of the Work. Both ghostwriting and guest authorship are manifestations of scientific misconduct. All detected cases will be exposed and appropriate authorities will be informed; 2. That the Author holds the full power and authority to grant these rights; 3. That the Work has not been published in any form nor in any language with any company or person that may still own proprietary rights to the Work. - By submitting the text, the Author grants, assigns, and transfers to the Publisher, during the full term of copyright and all renewals thereof, the sole and exclusive right to print, publish, distribute, market and sell the Work in any and all editions and formats throughout the World. The assignment is granted free of charge to Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies and shall be effective as long as it complies with the EU directives. - The Author shall receive two free copies of the Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies issue in which the Work appears (the Author of a review shall receive one free copy). - The Editor reserves the right to copyedit and proof texts accepted for the publication. - After copyediting and final proofing, the text, in an electronic format, shall be sent to the Author for his approval. After revisions and clarifications (if necessary) the text must be submitted to the Editor as soon as possible.
Zob też: http://www.kno.pan.pl/index.php/rocznik-orientalistyczny
oai:journals.pan.pl:111000 ; DOI: 10.24425/ro.2019.127215 ; ISSN 0080-3545
Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies; 2018; T. LXXI; No 2; 259-268
Since its launch in 1914 Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies), a semi-annual double-blind review journal has established a reputation for publishing original articles, as well as book reviews, on the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. The Journal provides high-quality academic research on the history, religions, art, culture, languages and literature of these regions. The approach is interdisciplinary, combining perspectives from linguistics, literary studies, archaeology, history, anthropology, philosophy, sociology, culture and religion. RO will build on this solid foundation, contributing to the further understanding of the areas of interest.
Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies) publishes manuscripts in English, German, French and Russian with abstracts in English. The Journal takes pride in being able to provide all kinds of fonts used for transcribing the languages of Asia and Africa.
Content of Rocznik Orientalistyczny (Yearbook of Oriental Studies) is archived with a long-term preservation service by the National Library of Poland.
Rocznik Orientalistyczny / Yearbook of Oriental Studies is an open access journal with all content available with no charge in full text version.
The journal content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
"Rocznik Orientalistyczny" znalazł się w wykazie czasopism naukowych MNiSW z dnia 31 lipca 2019 roku z liczbą 40 punktów. Obecnie jest indeksowany w następujących bazach: ARIANTA AWOL - The Ancient Worl Online CEJHS ERIH Plus ICI Journals Master List MIAR - Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals Scopus Slavic Humanities Index
Publishing ethics
The Editorial Board of Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies urge the authors to present the results of their original work in a transparent and reliable way, thereby preventing any cases of ghostwriting and guest authorship (honorary authorship). The term ghostwriting describes a situation in which a person has significantly contributed to a publication without being listed as co-author or without his/her name being mentioned in the acknowledgement. Guest authorship, in turn, means that a person’s contribution to a publication is negligible or none at all, yet such a person is listed as co-author or author. In order to prevent these, relevant provisions have been included into the agreements signed with authors.
All the articles intended for publication in the journal are screened for plagiarism using the iThenticate software.
All cases of misconduct will be publicised by the Editorial Board, which includes notifying the relevant institutions (the authors’ employers, academic societies, etc.).
The editorial staff of Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies act in line with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. All parties involved in the publication process (the editor, the author, the reviewer, the publisher) should be familiar with ethical standards observed in the journal.
________________________________________
Duties of Editors:
1) The editors have the authority to decide which of the submitted papers should be accepted for publication (taking into account: the text conformity with the profile of the journal, the academic importance of the contribution, the originality as well as clarity of the input). When making decisions, the editor should be guided by the journal’s policy, as well as by legal regulations on matters such as infringement of copyright and plagiarism.
2) The editors assess the submitted manuscripts on basis of their scholarly merit, without regard to race, gender, sexual preferences, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political views of the authors (fair play).
3) Unpublished articles, article excerpts, or materials contained therein may not be used by the editorial board or the editors for the purpose of their own research without the written consent of the authors. The editors do not attempt to influence the journal’s ranking by artificially increasing any journal metric, i.e. the editor shall not require that references to that (or any other) journal’s articles be included except for genuine scholarly reasons. Authors should not be required to include references to the editors’ articles.
4) The editors do not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers, and – in special circumstances – other editorial staff. In exceptional circumstances, the editor may share limited information with editors of other journals where deemed necessary to investigate suspected research misconduct.
5) The editors will safeguard the integrity of the published record, and publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions when needed. They will ensure that the peer review process is fair, unbiased, and timely. The editorial board will require all collaborators to disclose any competitive interests and will make every effort to prevent it. If necessary, steps to be taken include retracting a manuscript or publishing a corrective statement.
6) The editor can retract an article when research results have already been published elsewhere; the manuscript contains plagiarism or otherwise breaches ethical principles; there is clear evidence that the results of research are unreliable or that data has been fabricated. A notification of manuscript retraction should be understood as a de facto removal of the text. Such a notification should inform for what reasons is the text being retracted.
7) The editors reserve the right to edit the texts for length, stylistic details, conformance with style guides etc.
________________________________________
Duties of Authors:
1) An author of the article is considered to be an individual who had a decisive influence on the final shape of the text in the version in which it is to be published. If more than one person has been involved in writing the text and/or in the research underlying it, the contributions of all persons should be specified in the statement submitted together with the manuscript.
2) The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted and permission has been obtained where necessary.
3) An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical behaviour and is unacceptable. Publication of some kinds of articles in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
4) When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to correct or retract the paper.
5) If any unethical conduct on the part of the author of the publication is revealed – such as plagiarism, data falsification or re-publication of a previously published work or part of it (the so-called self-plagiarism) – the editors ask such an author for explanations and then may take appropriate steps in line with the COPE guidelines. At a later stage of the proceedings, this may mean notifying the authorities of the author’s academic unit, rejecting a given article, and refusal to publish any future texts by that person in the journal.
6) In line with COPE guidelines, any change to authorship information requires written consent from all co-authors. This should be expressed by each author in a separate (electronic) letter of consent addressed to the editor-in-chief. The consent of all co-authors to changing authorship information of a submitted or already printed paper must take written form. If authors cannot reach agreement on this, they should consult the authorities of their home institution(s).
________________________________________
Duties of Reviewers:
1) Reviewers influence the decisions made by the editor-in-chief. Their comments on the subject matter can also help the authors improve their manuscripts.
2) In the reviews the quality of the reported research should be judged objectively. Reviewers should explain their judgment clearly and support it. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Authors have the right to respond to the critical remarks of reviewers.
3) A reviewer should be alert to potential ethical issues in the paper and should inform the editor, including any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which the reviewer has personal knowledge. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
4) If a reviewer suggests that an author includes citations to the reviewer’s (or their associates’) work, this must be for genuine scientific reasons and not with the intention of increasing the reviewer’s citation count or enhancing the visibility of their work (or that of their associates). Information or ideas obtained through peer review must not be used for the reviewer’s personal advantage.
5) Reviewers are obliged to submit their opinion statements timely. If for any reason (from scholarly ones to time pressure) they cannot meet the deadline or cannot undertake the reviewing at all, they should notify the editorial board immediately.
6) All materials sent for review should be treated as confidential. Disclosing their contents to third parties (with the exception of persons authorised) is inadmissible.
7) The principle of preventing conflicts of interest:
A conflict of interest exists when an author (or the research unit which he or she represents), a reviewer or an editor is engaged in personal or economic relations which may inappropriately influence his/her actions. Each author or reviewer noticing an existing conflict of interest is obliged to report it to the editors.
Review process
The manuscripts should be original and inventive, and significantly add to existing research.
Submitted articles will undergo a double, anonymous and independent peer-review process (the identity of the reviewed author will not be disclosed to reviewers, nor vice versa).
The articles under review are treated as confidential.
At least two reviewers will be appointed by the editors among specialists in fields related to the topic of the article.
The reviewers will not be members of the journal’s editorial staff and will not be affiliated with the same institution as the author. At least one reviewer will be affiliated to a foreign institution, other than the nationality of the author.
The editorial board will make an additional effort to select reviewers with no professional or private relationship with the author of the text being reviewed. The reviewers will be appointed in such a way as to avoid any conflict of interest (understood as relations between the author and the reviewer: personal relations like kinship, legal relations, conflict, subordination in a workplace; direct scholarly co-operation in the period of two years preceding the reviewing process).
The reviewers will provide an objective review of the submitted article. The review must contain an explicit conclusion stating whether the article should or should not be accepted for publication. The reviewers must disclose any irregularities that they discover, in particular any forms of plagiarism.
The evaluation is based on the following criteria: whether it is a new and original contribution, whether the paper’s title corresponds well to its content, whether the paper’s structure is clear and correct, whether the literature is quoted correctly and sufficiently.
The reviewers choose one of the following options: to accept the paper in its current form, to accept the paper with minor adjustments, to accept the paper with major changes and/or updates, or to reject the paper.
As a result of the review process, authors may be expected to modify their articles according to the recommendations of the reviewers. Amended articles could be accompanied by a cover letter explaining how the comments were addressed and the changes made.
Editorial board retains a right to publish, to reject or to return an article for modifications. In the event of an ambivalent publishing review, the text is submitted for another evaluation.
Articles on which two negative opinions have been passed will not be accepted for publication. The authors of negatively assessed texts will be notified as soon as the reviews reach the editorial board.
The list of reviewers will be published at the end of each year in one of Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies volumes.
A different review process conducted by the editorial board applies to book reviews.
There are no processing charges nor submission charges.
The review of an article submitted to Rocznik Orientalistyczny / Yearbook of Oriental Studies - form
6 lut 2025
27 lut 2019
$number.toString().replaceAll("[0-9](?=(?:[0-9]{3})+(?![0-9]))", "$0 ")
885
https://journals.pan.pl/publication/127215
| Nazwa wydania | Data |
|---|---|
| 14 | 6 lut 2025 |
pl
en
