Details
Title
Warning against warnings: Alerted subjects may perform worse. Misinformation, involvement and warning as determinants of witness testimonyJournal title
Polish Psychological BulletinYearbook
2010Issue
No 3Authors
Divisions of PAS
Nauki Humanistyczne i SpołecznePublisher
Committee for Psychological Science PASDate
2010Identifier
DOI: 10.2478/v10059-010-0014-2Source
Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2010; No 3References
Apsler R. (1968), Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 162, doi.org/10.1037/h0021248 ; Ayers M. (1998), A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 1, doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454 ; Bartlett F. (1932/1995), Remembering. A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. ; Bellezza F. (1984), The self as a mnemonic device: the role of internal cues, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 506, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.506 ; Blank H. (1998), Memory states and memory tasks: an integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility, Memory, 6, 481, doi.org/10.1080/741943086 ; Christiaansen R. (1983), Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and postevent information, Memory & Cognition, 11, 467, doi.org/10.3758/BF03196983 ; Chambers K. (2001), Intended and unintended effects of explicit warnings on eyewitness suggestibility: Evidence from source identification tests, Memory & Cognition, 29, 1120, doi.org/10.3758/BF03206381 ; Cohen J. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. ; Dalton A. (2006), Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation, Memory, 14, 486, doi.org/10.1080/09658210500495073 ; Dovidio J. (1997), On the nature of prejustice: Automatic and controlled processes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510, doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 ; Echterhoff G. (2007), Tainted truth: overcorrection for misinformation influence on eyewitness memory, Social Cognition, 25, 3, 367, doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.3.367 ; Echterhoff G. (2005), How eyewitness resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics, Memory & Cognition, 33, 770, doi.org/10.3758/BF03193073 ; Greene E. (1982), Inducing resistance to misleading information, Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 207, doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90571-0 ; Greenwald A. (1981), Self and memory, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 15, 201, doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60176-0 ; Greenwald A. (1984), Handbook of social cognition, 129. ; Grice (1975), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. ; Hunter I. (1957), Memory: Facts and fallacies. ; Hymes R. (1986), Political attitudes as social categories: A New Look at selective memory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 233, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.233 ; Kunda Z. (2003), When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application, Psychological Bulletin, 129, 4, 522, doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522 ; Lindsay D. (1990), Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 6, 1077, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1077 ; Lindsay D. (1989), The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source, Memory & Cognition, 17, 3, 349, doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473 ; Loftus E. (1979), Reactions to blatantly contradictory information, Memory & Cognition, 5, 368, doi.org/10.3758/BF03196941 ; Loftus E. (1978), Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19 ; Markus H. (1977), Self-schemata and processing information about the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 ; Martin L. (1986), Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.493 ; Neuschatz J. (2001), Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories, Memory, 9, 53, doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000076 ; Polczyk R. (2007), Mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji w kontekście zeznań świadka naocznego [Misinformation effect mechanisms in the context of eyewitness testimony]. ; Styśko M. (2004), Myślenie stereotypowe i uprzedzenia. Mechanizmy poznawcze i afektywne [Stereotypical thinking and prejudices. Cognitive and affective mechanisms], 247. ; Wallen R. (1942), Ego-involvement as a determinant of selective forgetting, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37, 1, 20, doi.org/10.1037/h0060255 ; Wojciszke B. (1986), Teoria schematów społecznych. Struktura i funkcjonowanie jednostkowej wiedzy o otoczeniu społecznym [Social schema theory. Structure and functioning of personal knowledge about social environment]. ; Wright D. (1998), How misinformation alters memories, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 155, doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2467 ; Wright D. (1998), Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 273, doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00366.x ; Zaragoza M. (2006), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom, 35. ; Zaragoza M. (1994), Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934Aims and scope
Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Dimensions
• EBSCO
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• ProQuest
• PsychArchives
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
• Sherpa/RoMEO