Details

Title

Subject-subject relationship as a significant aspect of personal development in adulthood

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2011

Numer

No 4

Authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2011

Identifier

DOI: 10.2478/v10059-011-0024-8

Source

Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2011; No 4

References

Baran B. (1991), Filozofia dialogu. [Philosophy of dialogue]. ; Buber M. (1992), Ja i Ty. Wybór pism filozoficznych. [I and Thou: A selection of philosophical writings]. ; Buber M. (1993), Problem człowieka. [The problem of man]. ; Bukowski J. (1987), Zarys filozofii spotkania. [Outline of the philosophy of encounter]. ; Dajczer T. (2009a), Sakrament obecności. [The Sacrament of presence]. ; Dajczer T. (2009b), Nieodkryty Dar. [The Undiscovered Gift]. ; Frankl V. (1984), Homo patiens. ; Fromm E. (1996), Niech się stanie człowiek. Szkice z psychologii etyki. [Let there be man: Sketches in the psychology of ethics]. ; Gadacz T. (2003), O umiejętności życia. [On the skill of living]. ; Gałdowa A. (1990), Rozwój i kryteria dojrzałości osobowej. [Development and criteria of personal maturity], Przegląd Psychologiczny, 1, 13. ; Gałdowa A. (1995), Powszechność i wyjątek. Rozwój osobowości człowieka dorosłego. [Universality and exception: The development of adults]. ; Husserl E. (1989), Fenomenologia i socjologia. Zbiór tekstów [Phenomenology and sociology: A collection of texts]. ; Husserl E. (1993), Kryzys europejskiego człowieczeństwa a filozofia. [Philosophy and the crisis of European humanity]. ; James W. (2002), Psychologia. Kurs skrócony. [Psychology: A briefer course]. ; Jarymowicz M. (2008), Psychologiczne podstawy podmiotowości. [Psychological foundations of subjectness]. ; Kępiński A. (1972), Psychopatologia nerwic. [Psychopathology of neuroses]. ; Kępiński A. (1977), Lęk. [Anxiety]. ; Kohlberg L. (1981), Moral development, religious thinking and the question of aseventh stage, Zygon, 16, 203, doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1981.tb00417.x ; Labouvie-Vief G. (1990), Adult development, vol. 2: Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, 43. ; Labouvie-Vief G. (1996), Cognitive-emotional integration in adulthood, Polish Quarterly of Developmental Psychology, 4, 259. ; Marcel G. (1984), Homo viator. Wstęp do metafizyki nadziei. [Homo viator: Introduction to metaphysic of hope]. ; Marcel G. (1986), Być i mieć. [Being and having]. ; Marcel G. (1987), Dziennik metafizyczny. [Metaphysical journal]. ; Straś-Romanowska M. (1997), Wspomaganie rozwoju. Psychostymulacja i psychokorekcja [Supporting development: Psychostimulation and psychocorrection], 1, 60. ; Straś-Romanowska M. (1999), Rozwój osobowy. Próba konceptualizacji problemu w nawiązaniu do psychologii <i>life-span. [Personal development: An attempt at a conceptualization of the problem in the context of life-span psychology]</i>, Forum Psychologiczne, 4, 2, 115. ; Straś-Romanowska M. (2002), Status poznawczy kategorii "osoba" we współczesnej psychologii rozwoju. Zarys problemu z perspektywy psychologicznej i filozoficznej. [Cognitive status of the category "person" in contemporary developmental psychology: An outline of the problem from the psychological and philosophical perspective], Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2, 7, 149. ; Straś-Romanowska M. (2005), Jakość życia w świetle założeń psychologii zorientowanej na osobę. [Quality of life in the light of person-oriented psychology], Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 13, 262. ; Walesa Cz. (1997), Psychologiczna analiza zmian w rozwoju religijności człowieka. [Psychological analysis of changes in the development of human religiousness], Roczniki Filozoficzne, XLV, 4, 109. ; Walesa Cz. (2011), Szanse i zagrożenia człowieka XXI wieku (zarys problematyki psychologicznej). [Opportunities and threats of 21<sup>st</sup> century man (Outline of psychological problems)], Horyzonty Psychologii, 1, 23. ; Zagórska W. (2004), Uczestnictwo młodych dorosłych w rzeczywistości wykreowanej kulturowo. Doświadczenie, funkcje psychologiczne. [Participation of young adults in a culturally created reality: Experience, psychological functions]. ; Zagórska W. (2010), The psychology of human development - selected issues, 13.

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing


Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO

Publication Ethics Policy

Peer Review and Ethics

Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).
×