TitleTask conditions and short-term memory search: two-phase model of STM search
Journal titlePolish Psychological Bulletin
Divisions of PASNauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
PublisherCommittee for Psychological Science PAS
SourcePolish Psychological Bulletin; 2016; No 1
ReferencesTreisman (1988), Feature analysis in early vision : Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychological Review, 95. ; Van Zandt (1993), Self - terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search : An evaluative review &, Perception Psychophysics, 53. ; Yantis (1984), Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention : Evidence from visual search of : and, Journal Experimental Psychology Human Perception Performance, 10. ; Nęcka (2000), Pobudzenie intelektu Zarys formalnej teorii inteligencji ( Arousal of intellect : An outline of the formal theory of intelligence ), Kraków Universitas. ; Sternberg (1966), High - speed scanning in human memory, Science, 153. ; Hunt (1980), Intelligence as an information - processing concept of, British Journal Psychology, 71. ; Sternberg (1975), Memory scanning : New findings and current controversies of, Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology, 27, 1, doi.org/10.1080/14640747508400459 ; Turner (1989), Is working memory capacity task dependent of Memory and, Journal Language, 28. ; Just (1992), A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 99. ; Göthe (2008), The integration of familiarity and recollection information in short - term recognition : modeling speedaccuracy trade - off functions, Psychological Research, 72. ; Sternberg (1969), Memory scanning : mental processes revealed by time experiments, American Scientist, 57. ; Jacoby (1991), A process dissociation framework : Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory of Memory and, Journal Language, 30. ; Yonelinas (2002), The nature of recollection and familiarity : A review of years of research of Memory and, Journal Language, 46. ; Yonelinas (1997), Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information : The contribution of recollection and familiarity &, Memory Cognition, 25. ; Daneman (1980), Individual differences in working memory and reading of Verbal Learning, Journal Verbal Behaviour, 19. ; Oberauer (2001), Removing irrelevant information from working memory : A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task of : Memory and, Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Cognition, 27. ; Yonelinas (1994), Dissociations of processes in recognition memory : Effects of interference and of response speed of, Canadian Journal Experimental Psychology, 48. ; Townsend (1997), Parallel processing response times and experimental determination of the stopping rule of, Journal Mathematical Psychology, 41. ; Barrouillet (2004), Time constraints and resource sharing in adults working memory spans of :, Journal Experimental Psychology General, 133. ; Schneider (1999), Visual - spatial working memory attention and scene representation : A neuro - cognitive theory, Psychological Research, 62. ; Jensen (1987), Process differences and individual differences in some cognitive tasks, Intelligence, 11. ; Townsend (2004), Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high - speed search in human memory &, Perception Psychophysics, 66. ; Yonelinas (1999), The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source - memory judgments : A formal dual - process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics of : Learning , Memory and, Journal Experimental Psychology Cognition, 25. ; Wolfe (1989), Guided search : An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search of : and, Journal Experimental Psychology Human Perception Performance, 15. ; Gilchrist (2014), A two - stage search of visual working memory : investigating speed in the change - detection paradigm Perception &, Attention Psychophysics, 76. ; Cave (1990), Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search, Cognitive Psychology, 22. ; Yonelinas (1996), Noncriterial recollection : Familiarity as automatic , irrelevant recollection and, Consciousness Cognition, 5. ; Haygood (1983), Focus shift and individual differences in the Sternberg memory - search task, Acta Psychologica, 53. ; Logan (2002), An instance theory of attention and memory, Psychological Review, 109. ; Hertzog (1996), Aging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance and, Psychology Aging, 11.
Aims and scopePolish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.
Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
Publication Ethics PolicyPeer Review and Ethics
Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).