TitleDelayed discounting of pain with and without monetary reward
Journal titlePolish Psychological Bulletin
Divisions of PASNauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
PublisherCommittee for Psychological Science PAS
SourcePolish Psychological Bulletin; 2017; No 4
ReferencesMischel (1989), Delay of gratifi cation in children, Science, 244. ; Skinner (1974), About behaviorism New York : Alfred A Knopf Story Dread and the disvalue of future pain, PLoS Comput Biol, 9, 1003335. ; Ostaszewski (2002), Discounting of delayed and probabilistic losses of different amounts, European Psychologist, 7, 295. ; Redelmeier (2003), Memories of colo - noscopy : a randomized trial, Pain, 104, 187. ; Mitchell (1999), Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non - smokers, Psychopharmacology, 146, 455. ; Estes (1941), Some quantitative properties of anxi - ety of Delayed discounting of pain with and without monetary reward Differential ef - fects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses Memory, Journal Experimental Psychology Cognition, 29, 390. ; Hare (1966), Preference for delay of shock as a function of its inten - sity and probability, Psychonomic Science, 5, 393. ; Ostaszewski (2010), Probabilistic discounting in certain gain uncertain loss and certain loss uncertain gain con - ditions, Behavioural Processes, 83, 344. ; Kahneman (2003), A perspective on judgment and choice : mapping bounded rationality, American Psychologist, 58, 697. ; Lagorio (2005), Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III : steady - state assessments forced - choice trials and all real rewards, Behavioural Processes, 69, 173. ; Foxall (2011), Yani - de Contexts and individual differences as infl uences on consumers de - lay discounting, Psychological Record, 61, 599. ; Green (1997), Rate of temporal dis - counting decreases with amount of reward Memory &, Cognition, 25, 715. ; Redelmeier (1996), Patients memories of painful medical treatments : Real - time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures, Pain, 66, 3. ; Holt (2014), Discount - ing of food sex and money Psychonomic Bulletin, Review, 21, 794. ; Jarmolowicz (2014), son Discounting of money and sex : Effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant - de - pendent men and women, Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1652.
Aims and scopePolish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.
Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
Publication Ethics PolicyPeer Review and Ethics
Polish Psychological Bulletin is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review.
Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous authorities in the field.
Our guidance on publishing ethics is in accrdance with the COPE standards (see: https://publicationethics.org).