Title

Personality Psychology: Current Status and Prospects For the Future

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2008

Issue

No 4

Authors

Pervin, Lawrence

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2008

Identifier

DOI: 10.2478/v10059-008-0024-5

Source

Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2008; No 4

References

Bandura A. (2001), Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, Annual Review of psychology, 52, 1, doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 ; L. Benjamin, Jr. (1978), From motivational theory to social cognitive development: Twenty-five years of the Nebraska Symposium, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 26. ; Bergman, Magnusson, & El-Khouri (2003) ; Bindra D. (1954), The relation between psychometric and experimental research in psychology, American Psychologist, 9, 69, doi.org/10.1037/h0062472 ; Boring E. (1950), A history of experimental psychology. ; Cacioppo J. (1999), The case for sociall psychology in the era of molecular biology, null. ; Cacioppo J. (1992), Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: The doctrine of multilevel analysis, American Psychologist, 47, 1019, doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.8.1019 ; Cervone D. (1997), Social-cognitive mechanisms and personality coherence: Self-knowledge, situational beliefs, and cross-situational coherence in perceived self-efficacy, Psychological science, 8, 43, doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00542.x ; Cronbach L. (1957), The two disciplines of scientific psychology, American Psychologist, 12, 671, doi.org/10.1037/h0043943 ; Damasio A. (1994), Descartes' error. ; Dashiell J. (1939), Some rapprochements in contemporary psychology, Psychological Bulletin, 36, 1, doi.org/10.1037/h0058506 ; Dollard J. (1950), Personality and psychotherapy. ; Eysenck H. (1970), The structure of human personality. ; Funder D. (2001), Personality, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197, doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197 ; Greene J. (2001), Am f MRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 293, 2105, doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872 ; Hogan R. (1982), On adding apples and oranges in personality psychology, Contemporary Psychology, 27, 851. ; Jones M. (1962), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 10. ; Kimble G. (1984), Psychology's two cultures, American Psychologist, 39, 833, doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.8.833 ; Lewontin R. (2001), It ain't necessarily so: The dream of the human genome and other illusions. ; Luhrman M. (2000), Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry. ; Magnusson D. (1999), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 219. ; Magnusson D. (2000), Developmental science and the holistic approach, 33. ; Markus H. (2004), A social psychological model of behavior, Dialogue, 19, 1. ; Meehl P. (1954), Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence, doi.org/10.1037/11281-000 ; Miller G. (1996), How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology, Psychophysiology, 33, 615, doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02356.x ; Mischel W. (1999), Handbook of Personality: Theory and research, 197. ; Murray H. (1938), Explorations in personality. ; Pervin L. (1970), Personality: Theory and research. ; Pervin L. (1976), A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 465, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.465 ; Pervin L. (1983), Personality: Current theory and research, 1. ; Pervin L. (1991), Advances in motivation and achievement, 1. ; Pervin L. (2000), Developmental science and the holistic approach, 251. ; Pervin L. (2001), A dynamic systems approach to personality, European Psychologist, 6, 172, doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.6.3.172 ; Pervin L. (2002), Currrent controversies and issues in personality. ; Shoda Y. (1994), Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 674, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.674 ; Weiner J. (1999), Time, love, memory. ; Wilson E. (1998), Consilience.

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO