1. Allan, K. 1980. Nouns and Countability. Language 56(3): 541-567.
2. Berlin, B., and P. Kay 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense. Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bunt, H. 1979. Ensembles and the formal semantic properties of mass terms. In F. Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, 249-277. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
5. Carter, R., and M. McCarthy 2006. Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chierchia, G. 2010. Mass Nouns, Vagueness, and Semantic Variation. Synthese 174: 99-149.
7. Drożdż, G. 2017. The puzzle of un(countability) in English: A study in Cognitive Grammar. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
8. Drożdż, G. 2020a. New insights into English count and mass nouns – the Cognitive Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 24(4): 833-854.
9. Drożdż, G. 2020b. Grammar vs. lexicographic practice – a few remarks on what English dictionaries do not say about countable and uncountable nouns (though they should). Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature 44(3): 141-149.
10. Drożdż, G. 2022. Metonymic patterns of count-to-mass and mass-to-count changes and their implications for metonymy research. In A. Bagasheva, B. Hristov and N. Tincheva (eds.), Figurativity and Human Ecology, 251-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
11. Geeraerts, D. 2006 [1989]. Prospects and problems of prototype theory. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 141-166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Goddard, C. 2010. A piece of cheese, a grain of sand: The semantics of mass nouns and unitizers. In F. Pelletier (ed.), Kinds, Things, and Stuff. Mass Terms and Generics, 132-165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Heider, E. 1971. ‘Focal’ color areas and the development of color names. Developmental Psychology 4: 447-55.
14. Heider, E. 1972. Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 10-20.
15. Huddleston, R., and G. Pullum 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Jackendoff, R. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9-45.
17. Kachru, B.B. 1988. The sacred cows of English. English Today 16: 3-8.
18. Koslicki, K. 1999. The semantics of mass-predicates. Nous 33(1): 46-91.
19. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Langacker, R.W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Langacker, R.W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. 2007. Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 139-169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Palmer, F. 1984. Grammar. Second Edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
25. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
26. Rosch, E. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, 111-144. New York: Academic Press.
27. Rosch, E. 1977. Human categorization. In W. Neil (ed.), Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology I, 1-49. New York: Academic Press.
28. Rosch, E., and C.B. Mervis 1975. Family resemblances. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605.
29. Taylor, J. 1995. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory, 2^nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. Ungerer, F., and H.J. Schmid 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Routledge.
31. Wierzbicka, A. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
32. Wolf, H.-G., and F. Polzenhagen. 2009. World Englishes: A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

EDITORIAL BOARD

• Paola Attolino - University of Salerno, Italy
• Wiesław Banyś - University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
• Bogusław Bierwiaczonek - Jan Dlugosz University, Częstochowa, Poland
• Michael Bilynsky - University of Lviv, Ukraine
• Krzysztof Bogacki - University of Warsaw, Poland
• Jan Čermák - Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
• Bożena Cetnarowska - University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
• Magdalena Charzyńska-Wójcik - John Paul II Catholic University, Lublin, Poland
• Danuta Gabryś-Barker - University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
• Piotr Kakietek - University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
• Marcin Krygier - Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
• Andrzej Łyda - University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
• Elżbieta Mańczak-Wohlfeld - Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
• John G. Newman - University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, USA
• Jerzy Nykiel - University of Bergen, Norway
• Marc van Oostendorp - Radbound University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
• Tadeusz Piotrowski - University of Wrocław, Poland
• Czesława Schatte - Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
• Piotr Stalmaszczyk - University of Lodz, Poland