The editorial board of the “Rocznik Historii Sztuki” abides by publication ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics.
Editorial Responsibilities
The editorial board makes publication decisions exclusively on the basis of the scientific qualities of the text, its originality, and its alignment with the journal’s scope and aims. Editors are obligated to maintain confidentiality regarding submitted articles, their authors, and reviewers.
Authors’ Responsibilities
Authors are required to submit only original texts that have not been previously published or sent to another journal. All sources used should be properly cited. Authors are required to comply with copyright laws and obtain all permissions to use copyrighted materials.
Reviewers’ Responsibilities.
Reviewers are asked to provide a thorough, objective, and timely evaluation of the submitted texts in accordance with their knowledge and expertise. Reviewers are obliged to maintain confidentiality and not to use information obtained during the review process for personal aims.
Plagiarism and Academic Integrity
Plagiarism in any form constitutes a violation of publication ethics and is unacceptable. Submitted articles may be subject to verification of their originality.
Conflict of Interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence the review and publication process.
Review procedures
Submitted articles undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial board to assess if they fit the journal’s scope and compliance with formal requirements. The texts are then sent for double-blind peer review, which means that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Each article is assessed by at least two independent reviewers who are not affiliated with the author’s institution. Reviewers are kindly required to maintain confidentiality and not disclose their identities. Reviewers should hold at least a doctoral degree and possess subject-matter expertise relevant to the topic of the article under review. Reviews are prepared using a form developed by the editorial board and take into account criteria such as: originality, scientific value, methodological soundness and demands, and significance for the discipline.
Based on the reviews received, the editorial board decides to:
- accept the article for publication,
- accept the article after revisions,
- send the article back for further review,
- reject the article.