Humanities and Social Sciences

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN

Content

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2006 | Tom 1

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This year (18 XI 1965) it is the 40-th anniversary of the proclamation of the council constitution Dei verbum, which has influenced the dovelopment of the theology of revelation. In this article the author tries to relecture the reality of revelation according to the constitution, which has an interpersonal character whose Author is God revealed and the man is an adressat. God reveals Himself because of love to invite a human being to take part in eternal life. The fullness and endness of revelation has taken place in the incarnated Son of God. God has been revealing since the beginning of creation, in a particular to the first people (primitive revelation), during of history, different nations, until the election of Abraham. In the choosen nation God revealed the mistery of His will and he was acting for them to prepare humanity for His comming in Jesus Christ, which particulary has been shown by profets. The incarnated Son of God was revealing God by all of His life, His teaching, acting, behaviour towards people, and by passion, death and resurrection. In this article the author shows the meaning of revelation to the faith and christian life, Church, the world and theology. In his light the author criticises the pluralistic theology of religion.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Marian Rusecki
Keywords: 23-37
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Der Artikel behandelt eine äußerst wichtige und zugleich schwierige Thematik der Beglaubigung das Faktums der Inkarnation in der gegenwärtigen Theologie und Anthropologie. Die systematische Überlegung wird auf die praktische Seite des christlichen Lebens übertragen. Diese spezifische Eigenschaft der Theologie von Karl Rahner dringt in die grundsätzliche christliche Relation ein, die Relation zwischen der göttlichen und der irdischen Welt auf der Ebene der personalen Vereinigung der beiden Naturen in Jesus Christus. Das Ereignis der Inkarnation macht die Rolle der Menschheit Christi im Erlösungswerk sichtbar. Es bringt die radykale Selbsthingabe des Menschen an den sich selbstmitteilenden Gott zum Ausdruck. Der heutige Mensch verwirklicht sich (erlöst sich) dank sejner Transzendenz zu Gott, die in Jesus Christus den absoluten Ausmaû erreicht hat. Das Emporsteigen des Menschen als transzendetalem Wesen zu Gott ist keine Autosoterie, sondern vollzieht sich seitens Gottes, der sich dem Menschen mitteilt und auf diese Weise zu seinem Erlöser wird. Zurecht bemerkt also Rahner, dass die Relevanz der Menschheit Jesu darin besteht, dass Gott durch den Gott-Menschen erlöst, d.h. „im Menschen erlöst”, wie die Römische Schule lehrte.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Krzysztof Góźdź
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

La teologia praticata nella Chiesa, e sotto la sua direzione, deve avere sempre la coscienza della responsabilit della fede di tutto il Popolo di Dio, e per questo deve adoperarsi di tale insegnamento che non trasgredisce alla dottrina della fede. Non viola questo ± evidentemente ± la libertà della ricerca teologica. Questa libertà dovrebbe però realizzarsi nell’ambito della fede della Chiesa, su cui l’integrità vigila il suo Magistero. Così praticata la teologia può dare il contributo alla formazione cristiana degli studenti. Benchè la teologia possiede il posto privilegiato e responsabile nella formazione dei candidati al sacerdozio, tuttavia non può essere trattata oggi come il privilegio riservato ad essi, alle suore o ad alcuni solo laici, che si preparano all’insegnamento della religione nelle scuole pubbliche. La pastorale accademica, parrocchiale, diocesana, nazionale, come anche internazionale, nella sempre più unita l’Europa, e la collaborazione nell’ambito della ricerca alle nostre facoltà teologiche ed universitarie, dovrebbero fare il fondamento della nostra comune riflessione. La proposta delle aperte lezioni e conferenze alle facoltà teologiche, anche per gli studenti delle altre facoltà universitarie, potrebbe risultare utile per fare l’unione dei differenti ceti sociali, che rimanevano più di una volta chiusi nei propri circoli. Non si può dimenticare, che gli odierni destinatari del messaggio cristiano hanno la loro comprensione culturale ed il loro modo di pensare modellato da una mentalità scientifica e tecnica, che tende a pervadere la pluralità delle culture, che pretendono di appagare i bisogni dell’uomo. In questo contesto, la teologia si sente particolarmente chiamata ad affrontare a livello critico-scientifico il dialogo con la cultura e la scienza, nella convinzione che un messaggio che non si incarna in una cultura storica non viene seriamente accolto. Negli ultimi anni in Polonia, quando si nota la seria apertura delle universit statali alla teologia, si è creato un clima do reciproca stima e ci sono realizzati tanti concreti progetti di collaborazione. E tutto questo è stato possibile fare, perchè alla base di entrambi istituzioni esiste la profonda convinzione, che la teologia, con il suo speciale oggetto di ricerca, esercita il completamento della formazione umana, intellettuale e cristiana dell’uomo.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Czesław Rychlicki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Der Autor ist Begründer eines originalen Personalismussystems. In der Abhandlung erklärt er sich für die Verwendung der maximalistischen Philosophie, darunter auch des Personalismus in der systematischen Theologie als Lehre vom Glauben. Er weist weittragende Bedeutung des Personalismus in der Hermeneutik Joh 1, 14 auf und macht einen Entwurf des Personalismus in Neigung zur dogmatischen Theologie, die heutzutage vom Reismus abgehen muss.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Czesław S. Bartnik
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Chodziło w naszym studium o pytanie: jakie są granice rozumu w teologicznym poznaniu Boga? Do granic formalnych, to znaczy takich, które wynikają z samej natury teologii należą: pośredni charakter poznania Boga, uwikłanie języka teologicznego w immanencji, brak samowystarczalności rozumu jednostki wobec eklezjalnego charakteru poznania. Z kolei treściowe ograniczenia rozumu ukazują się w ontologicznych twierdzeniach teologii pozytywnej, w przeczeniach teologii negatywnej i w darze mistycznego zjednoczenia.

W konfrontacji z całością przesłania o Bogu niesionego w tradycji chrześcijańskiej, teologia katafatyczna domaga się pomocy dwóch dróg poznania: apofatycznej i mistycznej; teologia w trudzie ogarnięcia całego depozytu wiary przy pytaniu o Boga własnym dynamizmem odsyła od twierdzeń o Bogu do wycofania ich stanowczosści i do przyjęcia daru przemiany umysłu. Zatacza się w ten sposób krąg hermeneutyczy, by stanąć znów u początku drogi, która "od wiary wychodzi i ku wierze zmierza" (Rz 1,4).

Ścisłe powiązanie teologii z mistyką sprawia, że teologia nie powinna być pojmowana jako aktywność jedynie niektórych wiernych w Kościele. Myślenie o Bogu, będące jednocześnie intelektualnym zgłębianiem, modlitwą i pragnieniem stanowi sam rdzeń życia chrześcijańskiego. Każdy z tych elementów może odgrywać różną rolę w podprowadzeniu do zjednoczenia. Ważne jest jednak podkreślenie niezbędności poznania intelektualnego w tym procesie.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Tadeusz Dzidek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The author of the article presents theology of the word in a new light by putting together three categories which explain one another: the word, the person and the symbol. In order to bring closer together the theological perspectives of the Catholic and Protestant theologies, the former being associated with theology of the sacrament and the latter with theology of the word, the author uses many examples from the Bible to show that the word was equated with the personal act of God or even with the Person of the Word as shown in the New Testament. The word incarnate by its united humanity and divinity performs the function of the symbol in the Revelation which (according to a contemporary definition) is a synthesis of what is visible and spiritual, what is divine and what is human, etc. A surplus of meaning is a characteristic feature of the symbol; consequently, it always opens us to a mystery. This suggestion makes it possible to bring together theology of the sacrament and theology of the word. A real criterion of this connection is the Person of the Pre-Symbol.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Krzysztof Guzowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The author of this article refers to Husserl’s principle that every science should be justified by the experience appropriate to itself, and also refers to the recognition of as many types of experience as there are types of reality. Thus, the author proves in his article that through the power of Christian Faith, Hope and Love and through the power of the gifts of the Holy Spirit we are capable of meeting God who manifests Himself and redeems us in the Mystery of Christ. The author also points out that this specific visuality of Faith, Hope and Love with the sensations of the actions of the Holy Spirit form the basis of Christian Experience, common and mystical. The Christian Experience defined in such a way should be the source of theological cognition in general and be the source of academic cultivation of principal and formal theology. Theology that has its source in such an experience should also be verifiable by the criterion of such an experience. In this sense, Christian Theology is not a rationalistic and naturalistic inference from the Texts of the Holy Bible and Magisterium Ecclesiae, but is a formal explication and interpretation of the aforementioned Christian Experience. The author also argues that the ecclesiastical characteristics of Christian Experience excludes its individualistic perception and does not diminish the role of Magisterium Ecclesiae in the fact of the experience itself and the cultivation of Theology as the explication and interpretation of experience.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Walerian Słomka
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the present article is to show the link between apology and the Christian testimony of faith. The author points to those moments of testimony which are characterised by justification, substantiation and thus apology of faith. He does not, therefore, talk about the apology of testimony as something additional, supposed to authenicate the testimony as it were beside it, but about a reality essentially connected with the testimony and pertaining to its nature. The subject in question is presented in three points: the apologetic dimension of the testimony of Jesus of Nazareth, the apologetic character of the permanent testimony of the Church, and the recognition and motivational effectiveness of the Christian testimony of faith.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jacenty Mastej
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Im zweiten und dritten Jahrhundert nach Christus hat die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Gnostizismus den Anstoß zur Entwicklung der Kirchentheologie gegeben. Wir können das am Beispiel der Theologie von Iraeneus von Lyon beobachten. Seine Polemik hat zur Präzisierung der Kirchenlehre über den Kanon der Heiligen Schrift, des Begriffes der Tradition und der amtlichen Lehre geführt. Typische Probleme der theologischen Diskussion des zweiten Jahrhunderts, wie etwa die Bedeutung des Alten Testamentes für das Christentum und der Auferstehungsglaube, deutlich polemisch gefasst, wie die Auferstehung des Leibes oder die soteriologische Bedeutung des Todes Jesu, waren die Ergebnisse des Kampfes mit Gnostizismus.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wincenty Myszor
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Author of the article makes an effort to prove, that the main questions and problems, that emerge in the contemporary eschatology and at the same time considered as the new one, were formulated a way earlier, in the teaching of the Fathers of the Church. Unfortunately, the patristic eschatology shall be still counted among the number of less researched branches of theological knowledge. However, in the patristic sources we can find theses, including original and innovative standpoints of the Fathers in the eschatologically fundamental questions. They concern: 1) the interpretation of the human souls fate directly after death and the issue of judgement (the convergent statement is, that the soul itself recognizes and estimates the state of its likeness to Christ); 2) the interpretation of happiness of the delivered until time of the resurrection of the bodies (the essence of the happiness is sojourning with Christ); 3) the interpretation of the purgatory (purification, which is, maturation in love); 4) the interpretation of a possibility of permanent souls separation from God (a question of eternity of the infernal punishment, leading to the theory of apokatasthasis); 5) the interpretation of visio beatifica (contemplation and perception of the nature of God). The conclusion is, that in the trends of contemporary eschatology the reflection as well as development of Fathers of the Church teaching on "the last things" is significantly represented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Bogdan Częsz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

For this reason the present paper is first illustrating the evolution of thought ± from hagiography to hagiology. The question is articulated about the justified legitimacy of the introduction of the notion of "hagiology". The distinctness of the subject of research, which itself often demands application of the new methods, certainly proves the right to introduce the notion of "hagiology" into hitherto existing hagiographical researches. Having this on mind, the next question arises: how far the subjects of hagiology and hagiography converge between themselves? If holiness as a God’s gift has always points towards man, then in some regard the subject of hagiography coincides with that of hagiology. Introducing more precise distinctions, one should say that the exact meaning of "hagiography" would designate the popular biographies of saints, "scientific hagiography" would indicate the biographies of the saints, whose life has been investigated on the basis of formal criteria accepted by Congregation for the Causes of Saints. Hagiology instead would mean the realm of the knowledge, which in scientific way examines the sources and elaborates the main issues concerning holiness. It seems that more important difference can be seen in the methodology of researches themselves than in the subject of hagiography and hagiology.

The popular narration, used often by chroniclers in the biographies of the saints, should be rather replaced by more objective and scientific narration. In order to create the scientific narrations hagiologist should acquire comprehensive knowledge, which covers a large range of scientific subjects: the Bible, Tradition of the Church, hagiography, spiritual theology, liturgy, history of the Church, psychology, etc.

It is why the present paper subsequently shows the relations between hagiology and the above mentioned theological and humanistic subjects. Author is aware that the connection between hagiology and the others scientific disciplines is much wider and calls for more extensive studies. It can be said that the above paper is a small compendium in the examined subject and recognises the need to carry on further studies in this field.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Ireneusz Werbiński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Studiando le vicende della spiritualit polacca si pu notare che fin dallinizio, cio dal momento dellinserimento della Polonia nellEuropa cristiana, erano presenti in essa alcune correnti della spiritualit europea. Un forte influsso sulla nascita e sullo sviluppo della spiritualit polacca avevano gli ordini religiosi. Tra le dimensioni della spiritualit europea coltivate in Polonia una particolare attenzione merita la dimensione cristocentrica e mariana.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jarosław M. Popławski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polish authors have made a considerable contribution to the formation and development of the Theology of Spirituality that has become a separate subject of ecclesiastical studies since 1931. In the Middle Ages the eminent Polish theologians were Mateusz of Kraków (+1410) and Jakub of Paradyż (+1464). They visited Germany and Czech where their works gained some recognition. Confessio Fidei Catholicae Christiana (Moguntiae 1557) by Stanisław Hozjusz (+1579) is one of the most important works of the modern times, written in Latin, published 39 times during the authors life. The contents of the work influenced the attitudes of the people of those times. Christocentrically directed spirituality is represented by Stanisław Sokołowski (+1593) and Kasper Drużbicki (+1662). Many important thoughts on spirituality, especially on Catholic mysticism, come from Mikołaj of Mościska (+1632). The very first treatise on Ascetic and Mystic Theology is Summarium Asceticae et Mysticae Theologiae (Cracoviae 1655). Grzegorz Terecki (+1659) also skilfully combined ascetism and mysticism in his Directorium Spiritualis Vitae Fratrum Eremitarum Ordinis Sancti Pauli Eremitae (Cracoviae 1649). The Cistercians played the significant part in the propagation and development of the Theology of Spirituality: Michał Antoni Hacki (+1703) and Feliks Simplex Łącki (+circa 1700) together with Stanisław Papczyński (+1701) and Florian Jaroszerwicz (+1771). Notwithstandingly, the writings of Polish Resurrectionists, especially by Piotr Semenenko, greatly enriched Catholic Spirituality. Many works of importance for the development of the Theology of Spitituality were written in more recent times including 20th century. Józef Sebastian Pelczar (+1924), Aleksander Żychliński (+1945), Józef Puchalik (1958), Antoni Słomkowski (+1982) and Stanisław Witek (+1987) are important authors whose works cast new light on the problems of spiritual life and ensured the deserved position for the Theology of Spirituality among the theological disciplines.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jerzy Misiurek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This topic of the research was basically not undertaken yet in the theological literature. St. Faustina offers a definition of sanctity and shows its development till the point of achieving a mystical union. It is mystical sanctity, therefore, which ultimate norm is the unity with Jesus. In this line, Faustina trusts that God’s Mercy will make her holy. In this context we can understand that it was merciful holiness expressed by receiving mercy and rejecting sin. Christ is introducing her in the Mystery of His Passion. Pasha of the sanctity which is achieved by the Christian through the bond with Jesus, causes diving in His death and vocation to life in His resurrection. Therefore, it is a paschal sanctity. According to that, the paschal Mystery makes up the center of the mystical life of St. Faustina. This results that she puts heavy accent on this mystical union with Christ’s suffering, with His death on the Cross. She discovers her calling to sanctity under the influence of Pasha as a call to become a holistic victim offered to God. This work of sanctity we can call the Mystic of the merciful sanctity. And Faustina writes about this too, and not only about the Mercy.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Stanisław Urbański
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Pope John Paul II was recognized as a great master of a propagated word. Each of his homilies radiated faith and living affection, profound essence and considerable oratorical technique. He could fill a homily with a word of a personal profession of faith and testimony, he could give a speech using a creative and dialogical language and in the world becoming more and more secularized he could be a prophet, thus a witness of the Invisible God.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Kazimierz Panuś

Instructions for authors

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

Before you submit your article, review or report for publication in the journal Studies in Theological Sciences, please read the requirements for authors of texts.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TEXT TO BE SUBMITTED AND HOW IT SHOULD BE EDITED

RULES FOR PREPARING FOOTNOTES
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING APPENDIX BIBLIOGRAPHY
RULES FOR REDACTING SUMMARY AND KEY WORDS
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING A BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE

If the text of the article (review, report) has been edited in accordance with the rules adopted by the editorial board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences", please register/log in at the following address: https://www.editorialsystem.com/snt and then follow the instructions on the page.

Authors can follow the text qualification process on their account on the Editorial System Platform (link as above).

In all matters related to the publication of the text, you can contact the editorial office of Studies in Theological Sciences: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → CONTACT

Publication Ethics Policy

PRINCIPLES OF PUBLISHING ETHICS
that the editors of "Studies in Theological Sciences" apply, are in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics):

According to these guidelines, not only the authors, but all those involved in the publication process are required to respect ethical standards in the publication of the article.

1. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE AUTHOR

Authorship of publications: The author of a publication is the person who made a significant contribution to its conception, execution and final interpretation of the data. Anyone who influenced these elements of the work should be listed among the authors.
Scientific integrity: The publication should be prepared meticulously according to the guidelines of the Editorial Board. It must contain data to identify sources and a clear, transparent presentation of information. The bibliography should present all publications used in writing the article.
Originality and plagiarism: the author is obliged to conduct, present and interpret scientific research honestly and objectively. The author may submit only his own and original work for publication. Submission of an article for publication is understood as a declaration that the text has not been published anywhere before, including in electronic form, and that it is not submitted to the editorial boards of other journals or is not an excerpt from a compact publication, such as a monograph (the rule of exclusion of multiple or simultaneous publication). Plagiarism, self-plagiarism or falsification of data in a scientific article is unacceptable. The editors use the iThenticate anti-plagiarism program to check the originality of texts submitted for publication http://www.ithenticate.com/ Information about errors in published texts: The author should immediately notify the editor-in-chief of the journal if he notices significant errors in his publication. In cooperation with the editor-in-chief and the publisher, an errata, an addendum, a correction should be published or the publication should be withdrawn.

2. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO EDITORS

Monitoring of ethical standards: The editors are responsible for adhering to the highest ethical standards of the journal's publication process. To this end, it keeps a constant check on all activities at every stage of publication, and prevents abuses if necessary.

Transparency and openness (principle fair play): Submitted articles are evaluated by the Editorial Board only on their merits. The evaluation is not affected by such factors as race, sex, religion, origin, citizenship, political views of the authors, etc.

Publication decisions: The editors, after reviewing the reviews, make the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. In making its decision, it takes into account such factors as the scientific value of the paper, the originality of the treatment of the problem, clarity and compliance with the scope of the journal.

Principle of confidentiality: The editors are obliged to maintain confidentiality with regard to data on papers submitted for publication and their authors. Only the author, reviewers (with a double blind review procedure in place), the editor-in-chief, the editor in charge of the issue or responsible for the article, and the publisher have information about the article.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Articles not intended for publication may not be used by the editors in any way and for any purpose that infringes the author's intellectual property. Authors should inform the Editor about the sources of funding for publication, contributions from scientific research institutions, associations and other entities (financial disclosure).

Scientific integrity: The editors are responsible for the ethical and substantive level of the journal and therefore have the right to verify the data in the submitted article and make corrections, if necessary.

A barrage ghost writing i guest autorship: The Editorial Board conducts the selection of submitted articles in accordance with the principles of preventing cases of scientific dishonesty, such as ghost authorship, courtesy authorship, guest authorship, etc. In order to counteract similar cases, the Editorial Board requires authors to present the authors' contribution to the publication (with additional affiliation and attribution of authorship to different parts of the publication); the main responsibility for the content lies with the author submitting the article.

Text withdrawal: In the case of suspected fraudulent practices, the Editorial Board is obliged to withdraw the text from publication and take clarification and corrective steps. Detection of ethical malpractice (plagiarism, falsification of research results, manipulation of research results, method, fabrication of research results, etc.) should be reported in writing to the editor-in-chief of the journal ( marian.machinek@gmail.com) or to the secretary of the journal (agatarujner@gmail.com). A report can be made by a member of the editorial board, a reviewer, a reader of the journal or any other person who has suspicions about the integrity of the text. In the case of an ethical violation in a text already published, the editors will withdraw the article from the website, posting information about the reasons for the withdrawal, and in the case of a printed text, the editors will include an appropriate statement in the next issue of the journal. The editors will inform the author, the affiliated institution, the reviewers, the aggrieved persons, and, if necessary, other ethical regulators of the case. If the ethical malpractice in the text is insignificant, the corrected text will be allowed to be republished. If there is a conflict of interest within the Editorial Board, a report should be submitted to the Publisher ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl).

Complaints and appeals: Complaints against the Journal and/or the Editorial Board should be in writing and, when they concern the Journal or the conduct of members of the Editorial Board, they should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief; when they concern the conduct of the Editor-in-Chief, they should be addressed to the Publisher - the Committee on Theological Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl) and brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief. Supervision of the Publisher is exercised by the Dean of the Division I of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( wydzial_1@pan.pl). The subject of the complaint may be, for example: violated interests of the complainant, negligence, protraction or inaction in the case by the Editorial Board. The complainant should receive written notification of the handling of the case within 30 days from the date of the complaint.

3. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE REVIEWER

Text evaluation criteria: The reviewer assesses the compatibility of the subject matter covered with the profile of the journal, whether the title reflects the content of the article, and whether the article is an original text. The reviewer evaluates the article in terms of form (linguistic correctness, structure of the argument, correctness in the formulation of footnotes) and content (methodological correctness, completeness of the theses presented, factual correctness, timeliness of the bibliography used). The reviewer should briefly justify his assessment. The review must contain a clear conclusion including a recommendation for publication of the article.

Principle of confidentiality: The reviewer is obliged to treat the reviewed article as a confidential document. He can inform only those authorized to do so about it. The review procedure is done anonymously, which means that the author and reviewers do not know each other's identity (double blind review).

The principle of objectivity: The reviewer pays attention only to the merits of the publication. He does not judge or criticize the author. In the review he tries to be objective. He presents the evaluation of the article with clear arguments.

The principle of responsibility for the timeliness of the review process: A reviewer who agrees to review an article is responsible for completing his or her work by the deadline agreed upon with the Editor.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Conflicts of interest may be relationships of professional subordination, economic dependence, and such forms of social relations that may affect the impartial evaluation of the value of the text. All information and scientific concepts obtained as a result of the review procedure may not be used for the personal benefit of the reviewer. The reviewer may not be a person directly involved in the creation of the publication.

Peer-review Procedure

REVIEW PROCEDURE

The review procedure used in the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" is in accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education contained in the publication Good practices in review procedures in science, Warsaw 2011 and the Announcement of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of June 2, 2015 on the criteria and procedure for evaluating scientific journals.

Before agreeing to write a review, the reviewer should familiarize himself/herself with the PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS FOR REVIEWERS: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICATION ETHICS.

Upon receipt of an article destined for the ARTICLES or VARIA sections, the Editorial Board performs a preliminary evaluation of the text submitted by the author, leading to a decision to accept it for further processing (or reject it). The author may also be asked to fill in missing data in his submission. After the decision to pre-qualify the submitted article, the Editorial Board initiates the review procedure, sending the text to two independent reviewers, of which it immediately notifies the author.

The list of reviewers is not fixed, but the Editor appoints them depending on the subject matter of the texts sent. As a result, the reviewers are experts on the subject of the submitted text. The review process is anonymous, the reviewer and the author of the article do not know each other's identities (the so-called double blind review).

Accepting the text for review, the reviewer undertakes to complete it by the specified deadline. After reviewing the text of the submitted article, the reviewer fills out a review form, assessing the article both from the formal (structure, language, style, footnotes) and substantive (correctness of the argumentation, originality and completeness of the thesis) side.

The reviewer should justify his assessment and make any recommendations to the author. The review should contain a clear conclusion in the form of a recommendation to accept, reject or send the text back to the author for corrections and additions. Two reviews with a negative recommendation lead to rejection of the article. In the case of significant discrepancies in the recommendations of the first two reviewers, the Editor refers the text to a third reviewer, whose recommendation is decisive for the further fate of the article.

On the basis of the review, the Editorial Board decides whether to finally accept the article for publication, reject it or send it back to the author for corrections. The Editorial Board immediately informs the author of the decision, giving him the opportunity to read the review texts as well. To the more serious comments of reviewers, the author of the article should respond in detail. All comments of reviewers should be taken into account in the correction of the work. Correspondence between the author and reviewers is carried out through the Editor.

In consultation with the author, the Editorial Board performs stylistic proofreading of the text of the accepted article, with the aim of eventually producing a version of the text ready for publication.

The materials contained in the REVIEWS AND REVIEWS section are not strictly scientific articles and therefore, as a rule, are not subject to the evaluation of external reviewers, although they may be referred to them. The decision to publish or reject them is made by the Editorial Board.

Reviewers

REVIEWERS


19 (2024)

Ks. prof. dr Piotr Adamek, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Antoni Bartoszek, Uniwersytet Śląski
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Bogdan Biela, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Prof. dr hab. Jacek Błeszyński, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Prof. dr hab. Janusz Bujak, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. US dr hab. Grzegorz Chojnacki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. dr Zbigniew Formela, Università Pontificia Salesiana in Rome Italy
Prof. UPS dr hab. Sylwia Góra, Uniwersytet Pomorski w Słupsku
Ks. prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Góźdź, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr Janusz Kowalczyk, Pontificia Università Gregoriana in Rome, Italy
Ks. prof. dr hab. Janusz Kucicki, Nagoya University, Japan
. prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Kupisiński, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. KUL dr hab. Janusz Lekan, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr hab. Wiesław Łużyński, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UAM dr hab. Maciej Olczyk, Uniwersytet im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ks. doc. dr Marcel Mojzeš, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Slovakia
Ks. prof. dr hab. Jan Perszon, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UO dr hab. Janusz Podzielny, Uniwersytet Opolski w Opolu
. prof. PWT dr hab. Roman Słupek, Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu
Ks. prof. dr Innocenzo-Mária Vladimír Szaniszló, Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d’Aquino (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
. prof. dr Peter Volek, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Ks. prof. KUL. dr hab. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie

18 (2023)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Barth, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dola, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Maurizio Faggioni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Radoslav Lojan, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Merecki SDS, The Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II for Marriage and the Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, Holy Cross College, South Bend, USA
Prof. Stanisław Jan Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Marek Rembierz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Skobel, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Robert Skrzypczak, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College & Seminary, Cromwell, USA
Prof. Stefano Zamboni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Zawadzki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

17 (2022)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Paweł Borto, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland Prof. Martin Carbajo-Núñez, Pontifical University of St. Anthony (Antonianum), Rome, Italy
Prof. David Fagerberg, University of Notre Dame, USA
Prof. Bogdan Ferdek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Cristiana Freni, Salesian Pontifical University, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zygfryd Paweł Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Guzowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Vlaho Kovačević, University of Split, Croatia
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Miotk SVD, Rome, Italy
Prof. Andrzej Adam Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Piotr Piasecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Jan Polak, Palacký, University Olomouc, Czech Republic
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, University of Saint Thomas, USA
Prof. Roman Słupek SDS, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Adam Józef Sobczyk, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrea Vicini SJ, Boston College, USA
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Ray Zammit, L-Università ta' Malta, Malta

16 (2021)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Aszyk, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Bohdanowicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Piotr Duchliński, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ivo Džinić, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Prof. Zygfryd Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Daniel Justel, Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso: Madrid, Spain
Prof. Stephan Kampowski, Pontifical John Paul II Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontifical University of. St. Anthony (Antonianum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
PhD Roman Mazur, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Paweł Podeszwa, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Proniewski, University of Bialystok, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Thomas Rego, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile
Prof. Adrian Reimers, University of St. Thomas, USA
Prof. Czesław Rychlicki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Siemieniec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. med. Władysław Sinkiewicz, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
Prof. Damian Wąsek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. João J. Vila-Chã, Pontifical Gregorian University (Gregoriana) in Rome, Italy
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College and Seminary, USA

15 (2020)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland PhD René Balák, Slovakia
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Paweł Bortkiewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ladislav Csontos, Trnava University, Slovakia
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. John Grabowski, Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Collegium Bobolanum in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. René Micallef, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ireneusz Mroczkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Kazimierz Papciak, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Ian Randall, Cambridge, UK
Prof. Jarosław Różański, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Szyszka, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Dominic White, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
PhD Agnes Wilkins, Worcester, UK
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Krzysztof Penderecki Academy of Music in Krakow, Poland

14 (2019)

Prof. Grzegorz Bachanek, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. James Corkery, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tomasz Dutkiewicz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zygfryd Gläser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Adam Kalbarczyk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ewelina Konieczna, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Jarosław Merecki, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Józef Naumowicz, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, Italy
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wodka, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy

13 (2018)

PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Roman Buchta, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Joseph Carola, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Wiesław Dąbrowski, Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose „Fides et Ratio”, L`Aquila, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Cyril Hišem, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Cayetana Heidi Johnson - Universidad en Internet de México, Mexico
Prof. Przemysław Kantyka, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Kałużny, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
PhD Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontificia Universita Antonianum, Rome, Italy
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Rudolf Kutschera, John Felice Rome Center/Loyola University Chicago, Rome, Italy
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Linke, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Moskałyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Pawłowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Romuald Piekarski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Aleksander Prokopski, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
PhD Paweł Sambor, l'Institut Catholique de Paris, France
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Manfred Uglorz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

12 (2017)

PhD Mojżesz Asaah Awinongya SVD, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule in Sankt Augustin, Germany
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Achim Buckenmaier, Pontifical Lateran University, Rome, Italy
PhD Andrzej Dobrzyński, Center for Documentation and Research of the Pontificate of John Paul II in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Ledwoń, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Francisco José López Sáez, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain.
Prof. Michael J. Mikoś, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, USA
Prof. Leszek Misiarczyk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mieczysław Ozorowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ignacio Serrada Sotil, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Religiosas, Spain
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ralph Weimann, Domuni Universitas, Bruksela, Belgium
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wierciński, University of Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec, Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

11 (2016)

PhD Anna Abram, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
PhD Stanisław Bazyliński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Konrad Glombik, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Massimo Grilli, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Marek Karczewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Witold Kawecki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wolfgang Klausnitzer, Julius-Maximilians-Universität of Würzburg, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
PhD Edmund Kowalski, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Myszor, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Obirek PhD Sean Ryan, University of London, UK
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Wojciech M. Stabryła, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Szram, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Uciecha, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

10 (2015)

Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Edward Wiszowaty, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Cristian Sonea, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jürgen Werbick, Universität Münster, Germany
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Michael Gabel, Universität Erfurt, Germany
Prof. Wojciech Gajewski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Sikora, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Roman Siebenrock, Universität Innsbruck, Austria Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Michał Wojciechowski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Józef Urban, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pietrzak, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland Prof. Artur Malina, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Piotr Perzyński, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

9 (2014)

Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Józef Bunar, Facultad de Teología “San Pablo”, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marcin Hintz , Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Alberto Mingo Kaminouchi, Institute Superior de Ciencias Morales, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Krystian Kałuża, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Kaucha, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kiciński, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Marek Kita, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marek Lis, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Gerhard Marschütz, Universität Wien, Austria Prof. Erwin Mateja, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz , University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piepke, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule SVD St. Augustin, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Piwowarczyk, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland Prof. Roland Preis
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Marek Skierkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Wiśniewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec - Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy

8 (2013)

Prof. Roman Bogacz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Clemens Breuer, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule St. Pölten, Austria
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Dziadosz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wacław Gubała, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Kochel, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Łabuda, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Janiec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Konecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Antoni Misiaszek, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Misiurek, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piegsa, Universität Augsburg, Germany
Prof. Marek Raczkiewicz, Accademia Pontificio, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

6-7 (2011-2012)

Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krystian Wojaczek, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland


Plagiarism Policy

ANTI-PLAGIARISM POLICY

Anti-plagiarism system: Plagiarism is an infringement of personal copyright by appropriating all or part of another's work and publishing it under one's own name. Copying one's own work to expand one's academic output constitutes self-plagiarism. Plagiarism is a criminal act.

If plagiarism is detected, the editors will inform the institution where the author is affiliated, the reviewers and the affected persons of the case.In addition, the editors will post information on this issue on the journal's website and/or in the printed version.

In order to prevent plagiarism, the Editorial Board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" uses iThenticate software belonging to Turnitin, a global provider of technology services for science and education. The system allows checking the alleged similarity of a text with billions of online sources and texts deposited by publishers using Similarity Check.

Research data: The editors do not collect research data, and submission of a research data management plan is not a requirement for publication of an article. By research data, the editors mean recorded material of a factual nature (in numerical, textual, graphical or audio form) that is generally recognized by the scientific community as necessary for evaluating the results of scientific research. Under certain circumstances, however, authors may be asked to provide research data, even after the article has been published.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more