Humanities and Social Sciences

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN

Content

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2019 | Tom 14

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

According to Professor Czesław S. Bartnik, the scopes of both faith and culture are analogous to the human phenomenon. At the beginning, there is an individual person – hence both the faith and individual culture (microculture); then the specific community appears, and with it also the common culture (macroculture) as well as the community faith. Usually, culture is understood as an action that makes a person become more human (active aspect of culture). According to Bartnik’s personalism, the aspect of experience, any reception of the world (passive aspect of culture) should be added. The same dimensions can be seen in the experience of faith (active and passive). There is a correlation between faith (religion) and culture: religion defines culture, and culture defines religion (whereas culture is “earlier” in man than religion). The article shows that they both constitute a kind of dyad which leads to personalization of the human being (who nowadays is constantly threatened with unbelief and anti-culture – depersonalization). The culture–faith dyad is subject to the laws of history, and may assume various forms during its course. Former cultures used to be almost entirely built on natural faith in God although they had their atheist element, too. Currently, we already have an epoch of culture that strives to take an entirely atheist shape, however, even this culture does not exist without a religious (or pseudo-religious) form. However, the culture-faith dyad does not become disintegrated.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jan Krzysztof Miczyński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Faith and culture remain closely connected. Faith that does not become a culture is not the belief of the original. Nevertheless, we can observe two behavioral and confrontational and cooperative models over the history of these two relationships. Confrontation is a kind of cultural opposition to faith. Cooperation is aimed at comprehensive cooperation. The article analyzes the history of these relations which together with the new person’s awareness of the Church was able to develop a new concept of culture through which the Church will not only try to remove accommodation but also try to root in the world. Doing that, Church doesn’t forget about the evangelizing nature of the culture and communicative character of faith. Faith in Christ can be a source of culture with a C hristian profile, however, the point of departure for culture will always be human and not faith. The task of Culture is to express who a person is. Emphasizing this anthropology that portrays a man as a cultural centre goes hand in hand with presenting the human person as a picture of God. The above statement is the summit of personalistic anthropology and the source of the greatest human dignity. In this way, anthropology and Christology are as close as possible to each other.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Witold Kawecki CSSR
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, the question of religious potential of contemporary art is posed only in relation to visual arts, which contain the concept of religious art. The difficulty in answering it stems from the lack of consensus on the relevant criteria for determining if a given work of art is a religious one. These criteria might include the author’s faith and the religious topic, the liturgical or devotional function, as well as a style that is capable of expressing the sacred. The issue of how these criteria function in contemporary art cannot be answered without taking a closer look at two moments essential for the development of religious art. The first was the Renaissance, when the aesthetic values of a work began to give way to theological determinants. The second was the nineteenth century with its attempts to create a new canon of religious art. Both of these critical moments in the development of sacred art show that the religious potential of art depends on the concomitance of many factors. The main problem is finding a new form, a new style able to express the sacred and engage in dialogue with contemporary art as once the icon would.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Andrzej Draguła
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Numerous films, especially reinterpretations of the Gospel, can be read as loci theologici. Nevertheless, it’s important to recognize that the commercially motivated interest of filmmakers has its theological consequences: a resulting challenge is the catechetical use of apocryphal films in the pastoral praxis of the Church. The paper recalls main documents of the Church, relating to the cinema, stressing the absence of official teaching on the cinema in the last 20 years. Films, produced with commercial motivation, are often kitsch; it’s a result of tendencies to gain the possibly large audiences and to fulfill their expectations. An analysis of selected films (e.g. The Passion of the Christ and Son of God) indicates that the kitschy audiovisual apocrypha, superficial, emotional and lacking of authenticity, become a false filmic transformation of the message of the Bible. The paper postulates the need of constructing a theology of film: its object could be audiovisual texts, which extra-ecclesial theologies influence religious imagination and thinking of the viewers.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Marek Lis
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study focuses on potential athletic language in Phil 3:12-16. The main focus is the question what the assumption of the presence of athletic language in this text contributes to understanding it and especially its theological meaning better. The study consists of three parts. In part 1, the author analyses the preceding and the subsequent context of Phil 3:12-16 joining the defenders of a concentric structure: 3:1-11 (A), 3:12-16 (B), 3:17-4:1 (A’). The two framing sections (A and A’) focus on the opposition between Paul and his opponents, but the main point is Paul’s command to the Philippian addressees to “stand firm in the Lord”. Part 2 contains a brief exegetical analysis of 3:12-16. Our analysis focuses on the most important words (gaining/attaining; movement; thinking) and the goal of heavenly perfection with which they are connected. In the third part we analyse the potential athletic images in 3:12-16 which finds its “anchor point” in the noun τὸ βραβεῖον in 3:14. Based on the acceptance of this noun as an agonistic terminus technicus, other verbs and nouns which are not in and of themselves referring to athletics are interpreted as having an athletic meaning in our context. The study concludes with the caution that Paul counterbalances the “effort-reward scheme” of athletic language with the “giving-receiving scheme” of his call language. In this way, Paul introduces an emphasis on the future-orientedness of the message which is characteristic of his preaching and living.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Reimund Bieringer
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Forms and means of theatrical expression in ancient Roman culture, abounding in the diversity of artistic forms, had perfect conditions for development. The cultural activity of man has naturally created the need for stage performances. This publication presents a detailed analysis of the provisions of the synods summoned and debating in the 4th and 5th centuries, A.D. T heir content was carefully referenced, in relation to actors, mimes and circus drivers. The reason for such an outline of research is the classification common to all these professions generally describing them as representatives of performing arts. The analysis on this matter was subjected, inter alia, to canons proclaimed in Elvira (306), Arles (314), Carthage (15 June 401), Hippo (427) and again in Arles (442–506). In order to more fully illustrate the issue cited in the subject, the situation of representatives of performing arts was also discussed on the example of actors in Roman public law and a short description of the history of synods in the ancient Church was presented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Piechocka-Kłos
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is devoted above all to the analysis of the concept of conscience in relation to the space of public life (institutional, professional). The author of the article devotes a special place to the concept of conscience in interpretation of Jürgen Habermas and his ethics of discourse. In the first part of the article, the author points to the change it has made in the modern and contemporary sense of conscience in comparison with classical interpretations. Earlier, the power of conscience was associated with the intellect, whereas today’s conscience is associated with emotions, especially with the ability to empathize, especially the subject’s ability to empathize. Some emotions are cognitive and are related to contextual knowledge. In the second part, the author analyses the concept of the development of moral consciousness of Jürgen Habermas. This concept is based on a philosophical interpretation of the conclusions of the psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg’s experiment. In conclusion, the author writes about of the presence of the “voice” of conscience in the space of public life. Defending the value of discourse on the principles of social life, it can be based on the postulate of Habermas, or the dialogue of people with sensitive consciences.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mariusz Wojewoda
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is titled “The symbol of the serpent in the Apocalypse of St. John”. Its aim is an exegetical analysis of the term “serpent” (ὄφις). The expression appears in Rev 9:19; 12:9; 20:2 and 12:14-16. In Rev 9:19 snakes are a symbolic element of a cavalry that realizes God’s plan. In other texts the serpent is a symbol of Satan. In Rev 12:9; 20,2 appears the title “the ancient serpent” referring to the biblical story of Gen 3:1-24. It is emphasized that Satan is the tempter. In Rev 12:14-16 the term “serpent” is used as a synonym for the dragon. It is possible that the symbolic scene of aggression towards woman expresses a destructive satanic action against the Church. We also ask a question how much the apocalyptic dragon (δράκων) is a serpent. In the course of exegetical analysis we have paid attention to two perspectives. The first is a historical and religious background of the serpent symbol in Rev. The second is original theology of Rev. One of her basic features is very rich symbolism. The author of Rev. refers to the past, but introduces a new, original content.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Marek Karczewski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Like all religions Islam, too, has substantial ethical contents. The unique character of Islamic ethics, however, comes from the fact that it is entirely rooted in religion and so cannot be separated from it. Thus it is formed by the teaching of the Quran, to which the way of life of the Prophet Muhammad (sunnah) offers explanations. Man’s behavior in this sense is an act of either obedience or disobedience to God himself. It is also true that in the Muslim world a philosophical conception of ethics has evolved mainly due to Islam’s encounter with Greek culture. The central concept of Islamic ethics is character (khuluq), which is the state of man’s soul. It is in his character that man develops a tendency to perform either good or bad actions. Such understanding of human dispositions has much to do with Aristotle’s perception of man’s inner state that guides him to good or evil actions. These preliminary basic clarifications on Islamic ethics are then followed by brief accounts of select issues of moral life. Among those there are three main virtues (justice, kindness, charity) and vices (indecency, wickedness, oppression), marriage and the family, or the sanctity of human life (implying an ethical rejection of abortion and euthanasia).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Sławomir Nowosad
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This Paper takes in consideration the Social teaching of the Church, particularly expressed in the Encyclical Letter of Pope Francis Laudato si’ and in other documents of the Magisterium. The article presents the basic characteristics of „Culture of Care” and „Culture of Waste”, of biopower, of positive biopolitics and of negative biopolitics (thanatobiopolitics) with some alarming examples (legalization of abortion, selective abortions of females, destruction of supernumerary frozen embryos, lobbying for the legalization of euthanasia). Subsequently, it introduces the contribution of the Christian faith to these debates, from the biblical, theological and moral point of view, and invites the reader to respond to the urgent challenges in biopolitics by the responsible creativity in the social, moral and political fields. The „Culture of Care” is a culture of acceptance of the other, shaped by Christian hope and love, a culture of presence and of interest in the other, following the example of Jesus Christ.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ján Ďačok SJ
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In Christian ethical and anthropological discourse, the concept of “human nature” represented one of the main criteria from which norms for social and individual ethics derived. The age of Enlightenment brought about a serious criticism of this concept refusing its metaphysical justification. New opinions prevailed in philosophical and scientific discourse of that time. They rejected existence of common anthropological determinants and supported a thesis claiming that people are primarily formed in society and that the concept of “human nature” entails a risk of abuse of power by promoting only one view of the human being. The presented paper studies the relevance of this concept today and examines it from the perspective of Jonathan Haidt’s social psychology, which, as the author claims, contributes to better understanding of human nature. Standard metaphysical and theological definitions of human nature that prevailed mostly in Christian discourse needs to be extended by including findings from social and exact sciences and use them as a suitable medium for a dialogue in a pluralistic environment, and push the limits of our knowledge about humans.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Radovan Šoltés
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Meaning of Life by Yevgeny Trubetskoy (1863–1920) is one of the most important works of the religious-philosophical renaissance in Russia. The book addresses the issue of value of human life despite the evidence of evil, violence and moral decline. In order to achieve his aim the Russian thinker referred to the philosophy of all-unity and the category of revelation. However, he understood the latter category in two ways: broad and narrow. In the broad sense the higher meaning of revelation (all-unity) is constantly revealed to humans, which allows them to cognize and develop. In the narrow sense revelation came from Jesus Christ who has revealed the deepest sense of life by means of His paschal mystery. Every human being has a choice to accept or reject the content of the narrow revelation. Such things as collective consciousness, community-based experience, living within church, eucharist, and common responsibility not only for the fellow believers, but also for the whole creation – can help to accept the narrow revelation. The following article discusses also the aspects of natural revelation, revelation in non-christian religions, conditions and characteristics of christian revelation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

O. Adam Trochimowicz OFMCap
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article discusses the last Sunday in the Pre-Lenten period in the liturgical tradition of the Orthodox Church known as “Cheese-fare Sunday” or “Forgiveness Sunday”. The faithful’s attention is concentrated on the need to forgive others as one of the main conditions of crossing the threshold of Great Lent. Particularly noteworthy is the explanation of the very term “forgiveness”, as well as the kind of theological and moral message that the Fathers of the Church and the authors of the texts of the services of Great Lent find in it. Furthermore, it also clearly points out the tragic consequences of the fall of man, which is why has also been called “The Sunday of the Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise.” The main reason for recollecting this tragic event is the purely didactic aspect. There are two perspectives of spiritual life for a man who begins the trial of a fast way. On the one hand, endowed with free will - like the protoplasts - has the opportunity to choose a life in accordance with God’s commandments, which will result in constant communion with Him and saturating the gift of His grace. On the other hand, he observes what the lack of temperance and disobedience to the Creator causes. Great Lent is therefore an attempt to show the right way to return to Paradise reality and unity with God and people.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Adam Magruk

Instructions for authors

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

Before you submit your article, review or report for publication in the journal Studies in Theological Sciences, please read the requirements for authors of texts.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TEXT TO BE SUBMITTED AND HOW IT SHOULD BE EDITED

RULES FOR PREPARING FOOTNOTES
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING APPENDIX BIBLIOGRAPHY
RULES FOR REDACTING SUMMARY AND KEY WORDS
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING A BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE

If the text of the article (review, report) has been edited in accordance with the rules adopted by the editorial board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences", please register/log in at the following address: https://www.editorialsystem.com/snt and then follow the instructions on the page.

Authors can follow the text qualification process on their account on the Editorial System Platform (link as above).

In all matters related to the publication of the text, you can contact the editorial office of Studies in Theological Sciences: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → CONTACT

Publication Ethics Policy

PRINCIPLES OF PUBLISHING ETHICS
that the editors of "Studies in Theological Sciences" apply, are in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics):

According to these guidelines, not only the authors, but all those involved in the publication process are required to respect ethical standards in the publication of the article.

1. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE AUTHOR

Authorship of publications: The author of a publication is the person who made a significant contribution to its conception, execution and final interpretation of the data. Anyone who influenced these elements of the work should be listed among the authors.
Scientific integrity: The publication should be prepared meticulously according to the guidelines of the Editorial Board. It must contain data to identify sources and a clear, transparent presentation of information. The bibliography should present all publications used in writing the article.
Originality and plagiarism: the author is obliged to conduct, present and interpret scientific research honestly and objectively. The author may submit only his own and original work for publication. Submission of an article for publication is understood as a declaration that the text has not been published anywhere before, including in electronic form, and that it is not submitted to the editorial boards of other journals or is not an excerpt from a compact publication, such as a monograph (the rule of exclusion of multiple or simultaneous publication). Plagiarism, self-plagiarism or falsification of data in a scientific article is unacceptable. The editors use the iThenticate anti-plagiarism program to check the originality of texts submitted for publication http://www.ithenticate.com/ Information about errors in published texts: The author should immediately notify the editor-in-chief of the journal if he notices significant errors in his publication. In cooperation with the editor-in-chief and the publisher, an errata, an addendum, a correction should be published or the publication should be withdrawn.

2. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO EDITORS

Monitoring of ethical standards: The editors are responsible for adhering to the highest ethical standards of the journal's publication process. To this end, it keeps a constant check on all activities at every stage of publication, and prevents abuses if necessary.

Transparency and openness (principle fair play): Submitted articles are evaluated by the Editorial Board only on their merits. The evaluation is not affected by such factors as race, sex, religion, origin, citizenship, political views of the authors, etc.

Publication decisions: The editors, after reviewing the reviews, make the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. In making its decision, it takes into account such factors as the scientific value of the paper, the originality of the treatment of the problem, clarity and compliance with the scope of the journal.

Principle of confidentiality: The editors are obliged to maintain confidentiality with regard to data on papers submitted for publication and their authors. Only the author, reviewers (with a double blind review procedure in place), the editor-in-chief, the editor in charge of the issue or responsible for the article, and the publisher have information about the article.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Articles not intended for publication may not be used by the editors in any way and for any purpose that infringes the author's intellectual property. Authors should inform the Editor about the sources of funding for publication, contributions from scientific research institutions, associations and other entities (financial disclosure).

Scientific integrity: The editors are responsible for the ethical and substantive level of the journal and therefore have the right to verify the data in the submitted article and make corrections, if necessary.

A barrage ghost writing i guest autorship: The Editorial Board conducts the selection of submitted articles in accordance with the principles of preventing cases of scientific dishonesty, such as ghost authorship, courtesy authorship, guest authorship, etc. In order to counteract similar cases, the Editorial Board requires authors to present the authors' contribution to the publication (with additional affiliation and attribution of authorship to different parts of the publication); the main responsibility for the content lies with the author submitting the article.

Text withdrawal: In the case of suspected fraudulent practices, the Editorial Board is obliged to withdraw the text from publication and take clarification and corrective steps. Detection of ethical malpractice (plagiarism, falsification of research results, manipulation of research results, method, fabrication of research results, etc.) should be reported in writing to the editor-in-chief of the journal ( marian.machinek@gmail.com) or to the secretary of the journal (agatarujner@gmail.com). A report can be made by a member of the editorial board, a reviewer, a reader of the journal or any other person who has suspicions about the integrity of the text. In the case of an ethical violation in a text already published, the editors will withdraw the article from the website, posting information about the reasons for the withdrawal, and in the case of a printed text, the editors will include an appropriate statement in the next issue of the journal. The editors will inform the author, the affiliated institution, the reviewers, the aggrieved persons, and, if necessary, other ethical regulators of the case. If the ethical malpractice in the text is insignificant, the corrected text will be allowed to be republished. If there is a conflict of interest within the Editorial Board, a report should be submitted to the Publisher ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl).

Complaints and appeals: Complaints against the Journal and/or the Editorial Board should be in writing and, when they concern the Journal or the conduct of members of the Editorial Board, they should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief; when they concern the conduct of the Editor-in-Chief, they should be addressed to the Publisher - the Committee on Theological Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl) and brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief. Supervision of the Publisher is exercised by the Dean of the Division I of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( wydzial_1@pan.pl). The subject of the complaint may be, for example: violated interests of the complainant, negligence, protraction or inaction in the case by the Editorial Board. The complainant should receive written notification of the handling of the case within 30 days from the date of the complaint.

3. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE REVIEWER

Text evaluation criteria: The reviewer assesses the compatibility of the subject matter covered with the profile of the journal, whether the title reflects the content of the article, and whether the article is an original text. The reviewer evaluates the article in terms of form (linguistic correctness, structure of the argument, correctness in the formulation of footnotes) and content (methodological correctness, completeness of the theses presented, factual correctness, timeliness of the bibliography used). The reviewer should briefly justify his assessment. The review must contain a clear conclusion including a recommendation for publication of the article.

Principle of confidentiality: The reviewer is obliged to treat the reviewed article as a confidential document. He can inform only those authorized to do so about it. The review procedure is done anonymously, which means that the author and reviewers do not know each other's identity (double blind review).

The principle of objectivity: The reviewer pays attention only to the merits of the publication. He does not judge or criticize the author. In the review he tries to be objective. He presents the evaluation of the article with clear arguments.

The principle of responsibility for the timeliness of the review process: A reviewer who agrees to review an article is responsible for completing his or her work by the deadline agreed upon with the Editor.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Conflicts of interest may be relationships of professional subordination, economic dependence, and such forms of social relations that may affect the impartial evaluation of the value of the text. All information and scientific concepts obtained as a result of the review procedure may not be used for the personal benefit of the reviewer. The reviewer may not be a person directly involved in the creation of the publication.

Peer-review Procedure

REVIEW PROCEDURE

The review procedure used in the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" is in accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education contained in the publication Good practices in review procedures in science, Warsaw 2011 and the Announcement of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of June 2, 2015 on the criteria and procedure for evaluating scientific journals.

Before agreeing to write a review, the reviewer should familiarize himself/herself with the PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS FOR REVIEWERS: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICATION ETHICS.

Upon receipt of an article destined for the ARTICLES or VARIA sections, the Editorial Board performs a preliminary evaluation of the text submitted by the author, leading to a decision to accept it for further processing (or reject it). The author may also be asked to fill in missing data in his submission. After the decision to pre-qualify the submitted article, the Editorial Board initiates the review procedure, sending the text to two independent reviewers, of which it immediately notifies the author.

The list of reviewers is not fixed, but the Editor appoints them depending on the subject matter of the texts sent. As a result, the reviewers are experts on the subject of the submitted text. The review process is anonymous, the reviewer and the author of the article do not know each other's identities (the so-called double blind review).

Accepting the text for review, the reviewer undertakes to complete it by the specified deadline. After reviewing the text of the submitted article, the reviewer fills out a review form, assessing the article both from the formal (structure, language, style, footnotes) and substantive (correctness of the argumentation, originality and completeness of the thesis) side.

The reviewer should justify his assessment and make any recommendations to the author. The review should contain a clear conclusion in the form of a recommendation to accept, reject or send the text back to the author for corrections and additions. Two reviews with a negative recommendation lead to rejection of the article. In the case of significant discrepancies in the recommendations of the first two reviewers, the Editor refers the text to a third reviewer, whose recommendation is decisive for the further fate of the article.

On the basis of the review, the Editorial Board decides whether to finally accept the article for publication, reject it or send it back to the author for corrections. The Editorial Board immediately informs the author of the decision, giving him the opportunity to read the review texts as well. To the more serious comments of reviewers, the author of the article should respond in detail. All comments of reviewers should be taken into account in the correction of the work. Correspondence between the author and reviewers is carried out through the Editor.

In consultation with the author, the Editorial Board performs stylistic proofreading of the text of the accepted article, with the aim of eventually producing a version of the text ready for publication.

The materials contained in the REVIEWS AND REVIEWS section are not strictly scientific articles and therefore, as a rule, are not subject to the evaluation of external reviewers, although they may be referred to them. The decision to publish or reject them is made by the Editorial Board.

Reviewers

REVIEWERS


19 (2024)

Ks. prof. dr Piotr Adamek, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Antoni Bartoszek, Uniwersytet Śląski
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Bogdan Biela, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Prof. dr hab. Jacek Błeszyński, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Prof. dr hab. Janusz Bujak, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. US dr hab. Grzegorz Chojnacki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. dr Zbigniew Formela, Università Pontificia Salesiana in Rome Italy
Prof. UPS dr hab. Sylwia Góra, Uniwersytet Pomorski w Słupsku
Ks. prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Góźdź, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr Janusz Kowalczyk, Pontificia Università Gregoriana in Rome, Italy
Ks. prof. dr hab. Janusz Kucicki, Nagoya University, Japan
. prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Kupisiński, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. KUL dr hab. Janusz Lekan, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr hab. Wiesław Łużyński, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UAM dr hab. Maciej Olczyk, Uniwersytet im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ks. doc. dr Marcel Mojzeš, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Slovakia
Ks. prof. dr hab. Jan Perszon, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UO dr hab. Janusz Podzielny, Uniwersytet Opolski w Opolu
. prof. PWT dr hab. Roman Słupek, Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu
Ks. prof. dr Innocenzo-Mária Vladimír Szaniszló, Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d’Aquino (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
. prof. dr Peter Volek, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Ks. prof. KUL. dr hab. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie

18 (2023)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Barth, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dola, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Maurizio Faggioni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Radoslav Lojan, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Merecki SDS, The Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II for Marriage and the Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, Holy Cross College, South Bend, USA
Prof. Stanisław Jan Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Marek Rembierz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Skobel, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Robert Skrzypczak, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College & Seminary, Cromwell, USA
Prof. Stefano Zamboni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Zawadzki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

17 (2022)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Paweł Borto, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland Prof. Martin Carbajo-Núñez, Pontifical University of St. Anthony (Antonianum), Rome, Italy
Prof. David Fagerberg, University of Notre Dame, USA
Prof. Bogdan Ferdek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Cristiana Freni, Salesian Pontifical University, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zygfryd Paweł Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Guzowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Vlaho Kovačević, University of Split, Croatia
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Miotk SVD, Rome, Italy
Prof. Andrzej Adam Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Piotr Piasecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Jan Polak, Palacký, University Olomouc, Czech Republic
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, University of Saint Thomas, USA
Prof. Roman Słupek SDS, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Adam Józef Sobczyk, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrea Vicini SJ, Boston College, USA
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Ray Zammit, L-Università ta' Malta, Malta

16 (2021)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Aszyk, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Bohdanowicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Piotr Duchliński, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ivo Džinić, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Prof. Zygfryd Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Daniel Justel, Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso: Madrid, Spain
Prof. Stephan Kampowski, Pontifical John Paul II Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontifical University of. St. Anthony (Antonianum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
PhD Roman Mazur, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Paweł Podeszwa, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Proniewski, University of Bialystok, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Thomas Rego, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile
Prof. Adrian Reimers, University of St. Thomas, USA
Prof. Czesław Rychlicki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Siemieniec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. med. Władysław Sinkiewicz, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
Prof. Damian Wąsek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. João J. Vila-Chã, Pontifical Gregorian University (Gregoriana) in Rome, Italy
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College and Seminary, USA

15 (2020)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland PhD René Balák, Slovakia
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Paweł Bortkiewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ladislav Csontos, Trnava University, Slovakia
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. John Grabowski, Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Collegium Bobolanum in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. René Micallef, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ireneusz Mroczkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Kazimierz Papciak, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Ian Randall, Cambridge, UK
Prof. Jarosław Różański, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Szyszka, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Dominic White, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
PhD Agnes Wilkins, Worcester, UK
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Krzysztof Penderecki Academy of Music in Krakow, Poland

14 (2019)

Prof. Grzegorz Bachanek, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. James Corkery, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tomasz Dutkiewicz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zygfryd Gläser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Adam Kalbarczyk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ewelina Konieczna, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Jarosław Merecki, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Józef Naumowicz, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, Italy
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wodka, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy

13 (2018)

PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Roman Buchta, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Joseph Carola, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Wiesław Dąbrowski, Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose „Fides et Ratio”, L`Aquila, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Cyril Hišem, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Cayetana Heidi Johnson - Universidad en Internet de México, Mexico
Prof. Przemysław Kantyka, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Kałużny, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
PhD Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontificia Universita Antonianum, Rome, Italy
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Rudolf Kutschera, John Felice Rome Center/Loyola University Chicago, Rome, Italy
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Linke, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Moskałyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Pawłowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Romuald Piekarski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Aleksander Prokopski, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
PhD Paweł Sambor, l'Institut Catholique de Paris, France
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Manfred Uglorz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

12 (2017)

PhD Mojżesz Asaah Awinongya SVD, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule in Sankt Augustin, Germany
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Achim Buckenmaier, Pontifical Lateran University, Rome, Italy
PhD Andrzej Dobrzyński, Center for Documentation and Research of the Pontificate of John Paul II in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Ledwoń, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Francisco José López Sáez, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain.
Prof. Michael J. Mikoś, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, USA
Prof. Leszek Misiarczyk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mieczysław Ozorowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ignacio Serrada Sotil, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Religiosas, Spain
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ralph Weimann, Domuni Universitas, Bruksela, Belgium
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wierciński, University of Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec, Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

11 (2016)

PhD Anna Abram, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
PhD Stanisław Bazyliński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Konrad Glombik, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Massimo Grilli, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Marek Karczewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Witold Kawecki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wolfgang Klausnitzer, Julius-Maximilians-Universität of Würzburg, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
PhD Edmund Kowalski, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Myszor, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Obirek PhD Sean Ryan, University of London, UK
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Wojciech M. Stabryła, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Szram, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Uciecha, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

10 (2015)

Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Edward Wiszowaty, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Cristian Sonea, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jürgen Werbick, Universität Münster, Germany
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Michael Gabel, Universität Erfurt, Germany
Prof. Wojciech Gajewski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Sikora, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Roman Siebenrock, Universität Innsbruck, Austria Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Michał Wojciechowski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Józef Urban, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pietrzak, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland Prof. Artur Malina, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Piotr Perzyński, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

9 (2014)

Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Józef Bunar, Facultad de Teología “San Pablo”, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marcin Hintz , Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Alberto Mingo Kaminouchi, Institute Superior de Ciencias Morales, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Krystian Kałuża, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Kaucha, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kiciński, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Marek Kita, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marek Lis, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Gerhard Marschütz, Universität Wien, Austria Prof. Erwin Mateja, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz , University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piepke, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule SVD St. Augustin, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Piwowarczyk, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland Prof. Roland Preis
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Marek Skierkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Wiśniewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec - Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy

8 (2013)

Prof. Roman Bogacz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Clemens Breuer, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule St. Pölten, Austria
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Dziadosz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wacław Gubała, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Kochel, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Łabuda, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Janiec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Konecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Antoni Misiaszek, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Misiurek, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piegsa, Universität Augsburg, Germany
Prof. Marek Raczkiewicz, Accademia Pontificio, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

6-7 (2011-2012)

Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krystian Wojaczek, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland


Plagiarism Policy

ANTI-PLAGIARISM POLICY

Anti-plagiarism system: Plagiarism is an infringement of personal copyright by appropriating all or part of another's work and publishing it under one's own name. Copying one's own work to expand one's academic output constitutes self-plagiarism. Plagiarism is a criminal act.

If plagiarism is detected, the editors will inform the institution where the author is affiliated, the reviewers and the affected persons of the case.In addition, the editors will post information on this issue on the journal's website and/or in the printed version.

In order to prevent plagiarism, the Editorial Board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" uses iThenticate software belonging to Turnitin, a global provider of technology services for science and education. The system allows checking the alleged similarity of a text with billions of online sources and texts deposited by publishers using Similarity Check.

Research data: The editors do not collect research data, and submission of a research data management plan is not a requirement for publication of an article. By research data, the editors mean recorded material of a factual nature (in numerical, textual, graphical or audio form) that is generally recognized by the scientific community as necessary for evaluating the results of scientific research. Under certain circumstances, however, authors may be asked to provide research data, even after the article has been published.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more