The deployment of a distributed power-flow controller (DPFC) in a single-machine infinite-bus power system with two parallel transmission lines are considered for the analysis in this paper. This paper presents the network analysis of the DPFC for power flow control. The performance is evaluated on a given test system with a single line-to-ground fault. The improvement in the stability as well as power quality is evident from the results. Thus the DPFC has the ability to enhance the stability and power quality of the system.
Sound propagation from the vehicles moving on the city roundabout, with taking into account the wind is investigated. Solution of the problem for one moving sound source is found by means of the integral Fourier transforms extended over space variables and time. Inverse transforms are calculated approximately, using a stationary phase method and iterative technique. The solution for a general problem is obtained as a superposition of many partial solutions. The numerical analysis of noise characteristics is performed for the three-way Korfanty roundabout case in Łódź.
The sound radiation from vehicles travelling on the city roads with T junction was considered. The wind effect on acoustic field was taken into account. The solution of this problem was found with the help of the integral Fourier transforms and stationary phase method as the superposition of solutions for the cases of vehicles moving along the straight roads and roads with right-angle bend. As an example, the numerical analysis of traffic noise characteristics was carried out for the T junction city road on one of streets in the town of Łodź (Poland).
The problem of improving the voltage profile and reducing power loss in electrical networks must be solved in an optimal manner. This paper deals with comparative study of Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Differential Evolution (DE) based algorithm for the optimal allocation of multiple FACTS (Flexible AC Transmission System) devices in an interconnected power system for the economic operation as well as to enhance loadability of lines. Proper placement of FACTS devices like Static VAr Compensator (SVC), Thyristor Controlled Switched Capacitor (TCSC) and controlling reactive generations of the generators and transformer tap settings simultaneously improves the system performance greatly using the proposed approach. These GA & DE based methods are applied on standard IEEE 30 bus system. The system is reactively loaded starting from base to 200% of base load. FACTS devices are installed in the different locations of the power system and system performance is observed with and without FACTS devices. First, the locations, where the FACTS devices to be placed is determined by calculating active and reactive power flows in the lines. GA and DE based algorithm is then applied to find the amount of magnitudes of the FACTS devices. Finally the comparison between these two techniques for the placement of FACTS devices are presented.
In a deregulated electricity market, it is important to dispatch the generation in an economical manner and to ensure security under different operating conditions. In this study evolutionary computation based solution for optimal power flow is attempted. Social welfare optimization is taken as the objective function, which includes generation cost, transmission cost and consumer benefit function. Transmission cost is calculated using Bialek’s power flow tracing method. Severity index is applied as a constraint to measure the security. The objective function is calculated for pre and post contingency periods. Real power generations, real power loads and transformer tap settings are selected as control variables. Different bilateral and multilateral conditions are considered for analysis. A Human Group Optimization algorithm is used to find the solution of the problem. The IEEE 30 bus system is taken as a test system.
This paper proposes a methodology based on installation cost for locating the optimal position of interline power flow controller (IPFC) in a power system network. Here both conventional and non conventional optimization tools such as LR and ABC are applied. This methodology is formulated mathematically based on installation cost of the FACTS device and active power generation cost. The capability of IPFC to control the real and reactive power simultaneously in multiple transmission lines is exploited here. Apart from locating the optimal position of IPFC, this algorithm is used to find the optimal dispatch of the generating units and the optimal value of IPFC parameters. IPFC is modeled using Power Injection (PI) model and incorporated into the problem formulation. This proposed method is compared with that of conventional LR method by validating on standard test systems like 5-bus, IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 118-bus systems. A detailed discussion on power flow and voltage profile improvement is carried out which reveals that incorporating IPFC into power system network in its optimal location significantly enhance the load margin as well as the reliability of the system.
In this paper a novel non-linear optimization problem is formulated to maximize the social welfare in restructured environment with generalized unified power flow controller (GUPFC). This paper presents a methodology to optimally allocate the reactive power by minimizing voltage deviation at load buses and total transmission power losses so as to maximize the social welfare. The conventional active power generation cost function is modified by combining costs of reactive power generated by the generators, shunt capacitors and total power losses to it. The formulated objectives are optimized individually and simultaneously as multi-objective optimization problem, while satisfying equality, in-equality, practical and device operational constraints. A new optimization method, based on two stage initialization and random distribution processes is proposed to test the effectiveness of the proposed approach on IEEE-30 bus system, and the detailed analysis is carried out.
[1] Edris A.A., Aapa R., Baker M.H., Bohman L., Clark K., Proposed terms and definitions for flexible ac transmission system (FACTS), IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1848–1853 (1997), DOI: 10.1109/61.634216.
[2] Das D., Divan D.M., Harley R.G., Power flow control in networks using controllable network transformers, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1753–1760 (2010), DOI: 10.1109/ TPEL.2010.2042076.
[3] Ooi B.T., Kazerrani M., Marcean R., Wolanski Z., Galiana F.D., Megillis D., Jms G., Midpoint siting of FACTS devices in transmission lines, IEEE Trans. on power delivery, vo1. 12, no. 4, pp. 1717–1722 (1997), DOI: 10.1109/61.634196.
[4] Hingorani N.G., Gyugyi L., Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, New York: IEEE Press (2000).
[5] Nabavi-Niak A., Iravani M.R., Steady-State and Dynamic Models of Unified Power Flow Con- troller (UPFC) for Power System Studies, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 11, no. 4 (1996), DOI: 10.1109/59.544667.
[6] Harjeet Johal, Deepak Divan, Design Considerations for Series-Connected Distributed FACTS Converters, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 43, iss. 6, pp. 1609–1618 (2007), DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2007.908174.
[7] Amir Hamidi, Sajjad Golshannavaz, Daryoush Nazarpour, D-FACTS Cooperation in Renewable Inte- grated Microgrid A Linear Multiobjective Approach, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 355–363 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2723163.
[8] Narasimha Rao D., Srinivasa Varma P., Comparison of UPFC and DPFC, Journal of Critical Reviews, vol. 7, iss. 6 (2020), DOI: 10.31838/jcr.07.06.153.
[9]Abhilash Sen, Atanu Banerjee, Haricharan Nannam, A Comparative Analysis between UPFC and DPFC in a Grid Connected Photovoltaic System, IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS) (2019), DOI: 10.1109/IN- COS45849.2019.8951352.
[10] Song W., Zhou X., Zhigang Liang, Subhashish Bhattacharya, Huang Alex Q., Modeling and Control Design of Distributed Power Flow Controller based-on Per-phase control, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (2009), DOI: 10.1109/ECCE.2009.5316307.
[11] Chandrakar V.K., Kothari A.G., Optimal Location for Line Compensation by Shunt Connected FACTS Controller, IEEE Power Electronics and Drive Systems Conference, vol. 1, pp. 151–156 (2003), DOI: 10.1109/PEDS.2003.1282736.
[12] Vikash Anand, Sanjeev Kumar Mallik, Power flow analysis and control of distributed FACTS de- vices in power system, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 545–561 (2018), DOI: 10.24425/123662.
[13] Zhihui Yuan, de Haan Sjoerd W.H., Ferreira Jan A., Construction and first result of a scaled transmis- sion system with the Distributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC), 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (2009).
[14] Zhihui Yuan, de Haan Sjoerd W.H., Braham Frreira, Dalibor Cevoric, A FACTS Device: Dis- tributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC), IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 10 (2010), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2050494.
[15] Syona Chawla, Sheetal Garg, Bhawna Ahuja, Optimal Location of Series-Shunt FACTS Device for Transmission Line Compensation, IEEE Control, Automation, Communication and Energy Conservation Conference, pp. 1–6 (2009).
[16] Shehata Ahmed A., Refaat Ahmed, Mamdouh K. Ahmed, Korovkin Nikolay V., Optimal placement and sizing of FACTS devices based on Autonomous Groups Particle Swarm Optimization technique, AEE, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 161–172 (2021), DOI: 10.24425/aee.2021.136059.
[17] Riadh Essaadali, Anwar Jarndal, Ammar B. Kouki, Fadhel M. Ghannouch, Conversion Rules Between X-Parameters and Linearized Two-Port Network Parameters for Large-Signal Operating Conditions, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 4745 4756 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2018.2863227.
[18] Divya S., Shyamala U., Power quality improvement in transmission systems using DPFC, IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS) (2015), DOI: 10.1109/ ECS.2015.7125035.
[19] Apolinar Reynoso-Hernández J., Pulido-Gaytán M.A., Cuesta R., Loo-Yau J.R., Maya-Sánchez M.C., Transmission Line Impedance Characterization Using an Uncalibrated Vector Network Analyzer, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 528–530 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/ LMWC.2020.2984377.
[20] Monika Sharma, Annapurna Bhargava, Pinky Yadav, Oscillation Damping with DPFC Using Opti- mization Techniques, IEEE International Conference on Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE) (2017), DOI: 10.1109/ICMETE.2016.73.
[21] Mengmeng Xiao, Shaorong Wang, Yong Huang, Chao Zheng, Qiushi Xu, Hongsheng Zhao, Aihong Tang, Dichen Liu, Two-Level Control Method for DPFC Series Units Based on PLC Communication, 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 20–22 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/EI2.2018.8582109.
[22] Zhai X., Tang A., Zou X., Xu Zheng, Qiushi Xu, Research on DPFC Capacity and Parameter Design Method, IEEE International Conference on Information Technology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (ICIBA) (2020), DOI: 10.1109/ICIBA50161.2020.9277315.
[23] Pradhan A.K., Routray A., Banaja Mohanty, Maximum efficiency of flexible AC transmission systems, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 28, pp. 581–588 (2006), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.014.
[24] Seyed Abbas Taher, Muhammad Karim Amooshahi, New approach for optimal UPFC placement using hybrid immune algorithm in electric power systems, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 43, iss. 1, pp. 899–909 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.064.
The uncontrolled power flow in the AC power system caused by renewable energy sources (restless sources, distributed energy sources), dynamic loads, etc., is one of many causes of voltage perturbation, along with others, such as switching effects, faults, and adverse weather conditions. This paper presents a three-phase voltage and power flow controller, based on direct PWM AC/AC converters. The proposed solution is intended to protect sensitive loads against voltage fluctuation and problems with power flow control in an AC power system. In comparison to other solutions, such as DVR, UPFC, the presented solution is based on bipolar matrix choppers and operates without a DC energy storage unit or DC link. The proposed solution is able to compensate 50% voltage sags, in the case of three-phase symmetrical voltage perturbation, and single phase voltage interruptions. Additionally, by means of a voltage phase control with a range of ±60◦ in each phase, it is possible to control the power flow in an AC power system. The paper presents an operational description, a theoretical analysis based on the averaged state space method and four terminal descriptions, and the experimental test results from a 1 kVA laboratory model operating under active load.
Transmission line loss minimization in a power system is an important research issue and it can be achieved by means of reactive power compensation. The unscheduled increment of load in a power system has driven the system to experience stressed conditions. This phenomenon has also led to voltage profile depreciation below the acceptable secure limit. The significance and use of Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices and capacitor placement is in order to alleviate the voltage profile decay problem. The optimal value of compensating devices equires proper optimization technique, able to search the optimal solution with less computational burden. This paper presents a technique to provide simultaneous or individual controls of basic system parameter like transmission voltage, impedance and phase angle, thereby controlling the transmitted power using Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) based on Bacterial Foraging (BF) algorithm. Voltage stability level of the system is defined on the Fast Voltage Stability Index (FVSI) of the lines. The IEEE 14-bus system is used as the test system to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed system. The test result showed that the ocation of UPFC improves the voltage profile and also minimize the real power loss.
This paper presents the application of an improved ant colony optimization algorithm called mixed integer distributed ant colony optimization to optimize the power flow solution in power grids. The results provided indicate an improvement in the reduction of operational costs in comparison with other optimization algorithms used in optimal power flow studies. The application was realized to optimize power flow in the IEEE 30 and the IEEE 57 bus test cases with the objective of operational cost minimization. The optimal power flow problem described is a non-linear, non-convex, complex and heavily constrained problem.
The paper presents a concept of a control system for a high-frequency three-phase PWM grid-tied converter (3x400 V / 50 Hz) that performs functions of a 10-kW DC power supply with voltage range of 600÷800 V and of a reactive power compensator. Simulation tests (in PLECS) allowed proper selection of semiconductor switches between fast IGBTs and silicon carbide MOSFETs. As the main criterion minimum amount of power losses in semiconductor devices was adopted. Switching frequency of at least 40 kHz was used with the aim of minimizing size of passive filters (chokes, capacitors) both on the AC side and on the DC side. Simulation results have been confirmed in experimental studies of the PWM converter, the power factor of which (inductive and capacitive) could be regulated in range from 0.7 to 1.0 with THDi of line currents below 5% and energy efficiency of approximately 98.5%. The control system was implemented in Texas Instruments TMS320F28377S microcontroller.