Benchmarking Supplier Development: An Empirical Case Study of Validating a Framework to Improve Buyer-Supplier Relationship

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review




No 1



Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych


Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management




DOI: 10.1515/mper-2016-0007


Management and Production Engineering Review; 2016; No 1


Joshi (1999), The contingent effect of specific asset investments on joint action in manufacturer - supplier relationships : an empirical test of the moderating role of reciprocal asset investments uncertainty and trust, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50, 291, ; Eisenhardt (2007), Theory building from cases : opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 70, 25, ; Hunter (1996), A partnership route to human resource management ?, Journal of Management Studies, 55, 235, ; Dyer (2000), Creating and managing high performance knowledge sharing networks : the Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal, 56, 345,<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N ; Rosenzweig (2003), The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance : an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 61, 437, ; Hartley (1996), Supplier development : customers as a catalyst of process change, Business Horizons, 39, 37, ; Dyer (1993), Japanese style partnership : giving companies a competitive advantage, Sloan Management Review, 40, 51. ; Ellram (2002), The financial impact of supply management Supply Chain, Management Review, 58, 30. ; Krause (1997), Critical elements of supplier development : the buying - firm perspective of Purchasing and Supply Management, European Journal, 3, 21. ; Harland (1996), Supply chain management : relationships chains and networks, British Journal of Management, 38, 63, ; Heide (1990), Alliances in industrial purchasing : the determinants of joint action in buyersupplier relationships, Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 24, ; Fawcett (2008), Benefits barriers and bridges to effective supply chain management Supply Chain Management : An, International Journal, 33, 35. ; Ghauri (2004), Designing and conducting case studies in international business research Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International, Business, 72, 109. ; Newman (1990), A case study of NUMMI and its suppliers of Purchasing and Materials Management, International Journal, 51, 15. ; Sánchez (2004), Martínez Quality management practices in the purchasing function : an empirical study of Operations and Production Management, International Journal, 49, 666. ; Liker (2004), Building deep supplier relationships, Harvard Business Review, 66, 104. ; Thompson (1967), Organizations in Action Social Bases of Administrative McGraw - Hill New York, Science. ; Araz (2007), Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure, International Journal of Production Economics, 28, 585, ; Krause (1999), The antecedents of buying firm s efforts to improve suppliers, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 205, ; Modi (2007), Supplier development : improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 42, ; Humphreys (2012), The impact of supplier development on buyer com - petitive advantage : A path analytic model, International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 353, ; Narasimhan (2002), Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance : evidence from Japanese and Korean firms, Journal of Operations Management, 60, 303, ; Bonoma (1985), Case research in marketing : opportunities problems and a process, Journal of Marketing Research, 71, 199, ; Droge (2004), The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time - based performance and overall firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 62, 557, ; Eisenhardt (1991), Better stories and better constructs : The case for rigor and comparative logic, Academy of Management Review, 77, 620. ; Wagner (2006), Supplier development practices : an exploratory study, European Journal of Marketing, 54, 554, ; Handfield (2000), Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development, Sloan Management Review, 24, 37. ; Sillanpää (2015), Supplier development and buyer - supplier relationship strategies - a literature review of Procurement Management, International Journal, 8, 227. ; Lintukangas (2011), Supplier relationship management capability in global supply management of Procurement Management, International Journal, 4, 1. ; MacDuffie (1997), Creating lean suppliers : Diffusing lean production through the supply chain, California Management Review, 83, 118, ; Lieberman (1997), Inventory reduction and productivity growth : a comparison of Japanese and US automotive sectors, Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, 73,<73::AID-MDE811>3.0.CO;2-H ; Leenders (1966), Supplier development of Purchasing, Journal, 2, 47. ; Williamson (1981), The economics of organization : the transaction cost approach, American Journal of Sociology, 46, 548, ; Krause (2000), A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firms strategies to improve supplier performance, Decision Sciences, 31, 33, ; Spekman (1988), Strategic supplier selection : Understanding long - term buyer relationships, Business Horizons, 42, 75, ; Frohlich (2002), Demand chain management in manufacturing and services : web - based integration drivers and performance, Journal of Operations Management, 59, 729, ; McCutcheon (1993), Conducting case study research in operations management, Journal of Operations Management, 80, 239, ; Stuart (1995), Problem sources in establishing strategic supplier alliances of Purchasing and Materials Management, International Journal, 52, 3. ; Monczka (1993), Supply base strategies to maximize supplier performance of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, International Journal, 27, 42. ; Krause (1997), Success factors in supplier development of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, International Journal, 27, 39. ; Krause (1998), An empirical investigation of supplier development : Reactive and strategic processes, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 39, ; Song (2008), Di Supplier s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures, Journal of Operations Management, 30, 1, ; Krause (1997), Supplier development : current practices and outcomes of Purchasing and Materials Management, International Journal, 33, 12. ; Lettice (2010), Buyer - supplier partnerships during product design and development in the global automotive sector : who invests in what and when ?, International Journal of Production Economics, 82, 309, ; Loppacher (2011), Key drivers of buyer - supplier relationships in global sourcing strategies of Procurement Management, International Journal, 4, 156. ; Dyer (1996), Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : evidence from the auto industry, Strategic Management Journal, 45, 271,<271::AID-SMJ807>3.0.CO;2-Y ; Tezuka (1997), Success as the source of failure ? Competition and cooperation in the Japanese economy, Sloan Management Review, 41, 83. ; Hammami (2014), A scenariobased stochastic model for supplier selection in global context with multiple buyers currency fluctuation uncertainties and price discounts, European Journal of Operational Research, 31, 159, ; Prahinski (2004), Supplier evaluations : communication strategies to improve supplier performance, Journal of Operations Management, 67, 39, ; Sucky (2013), Supplier development : current status of empirical research of Procurement Management, International Journal, 6, 92. ; Wynstra (2000), Ten Managing supplier involvement in new product development : A portfolio approach of Purchasing & Supply Management, European Journal, 35, 49. ; Petersen (2005), Supplier integration into new product development : coordinating product process and supply chain design, Journal of Operations Management, 65, 371, ; Bryman (2004), Qualitative research on leadership : A critical but appreciative review The, Leadership Quarterly, 78, 729, ; Watts (1993), Supplier development programs : an empirical analysis of Purchasing andMaterials Management, International Journal, 29, 11. ; Carr (1999), Strategically managed buyer - supplier relationships and performance outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, 37, 497, ; Choy (2002), Development of a case based intelligent customer - supplier relationship management system Systems with Applications, Expert, 29, 281. ; Wagner (2009), Supplier development : communication approaches activities and goals, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 3161, ; Krause (2007), The relationships between supplier development commitment social capital accumulation and performance improvement, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 528, ; Routroy (2013), Evaluating the critical success factors of supplier development : a case study Benchmarking : An, International Journal, 25, 322. ; Ho (2010), Multi - criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection : A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 32, 16, ; Eisenhardt (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 69, 532.

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at:
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to the Editorial Office. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2021, Volume 12, including postage and handling, is 200 PLN.

Open Access Policy

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources:

Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office ( The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (e-mail: will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months


Zahid Hussain Agha Sarhad University of Science and IT Peshawar Pakistan
Mehmet Ali Akinlar Yildiz Technical University Turkey
Zoran Anisic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences Serbia
Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology Poland
Rajesh As Maharaja Institute of Technology Thandavapura India
Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee Mazandaran University of Science and Technology Iran
Zbigniew Banaszak Koszalin University of Technology Poland
Jolanta Baran Silesian University of Technology Poland
Mariusz Bednarek WSB Warszawa Poland
Srinivasa Murthy Boorla Grupo Antolin Spain
Oumaima Bounou FST-Fez Marocco
Robert Cep VSB-TU OSTRAVA Czech Republic
Fatih Çetin Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Turkey
Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania
Pedro Cunha Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal Portugal
Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business Poland
Asta Daunorienė Assoc. prof., Kaunas University of Technology Lithuania
Ahmed Deif Associate Prof. California Polytechnic State University USA
Yuliia Denysenko Sumy State University Ukraine
Jacek Diakun Poznań University of Technology Poland
Ewa Dostatni Poznan University of Technology Poland
Joanna Duda AGH University of Science and Technology Poland
Milan Edl University of West Bohemia Czech Republic
Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology Poland
Nurprihatin Filscha Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Bunda Mulia Indonesia
Adi Fitra Magister Industrial Engineering ,Mercubuana University Indonesia
Mosè Gallo Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico II Italy
Józef Gawlik Cracow Univesity of Technology Poland
Andrzej Gessner Poznan University of Technology Poland
Arkadiusz Gola Lublin University of Technology, Poland Poland
Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran
Błażej Góralski Poznan University of Technology Chair of Production Engineering Poland
Pop Grigore Marian Technical university of Cluj-Napoca Romania
Łukasz Grudzień Poznan University of Technology Poland
Vitalii Ivanov Sumy State University Ukraine
Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek Poznan University of Technology Poland
Jozef Jurko Technical University in Košice Poland
Oksana Karpenko RUDN University Russia
Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology Poland
Sławomir Klos University of Zielona Góra, Institute of Mechanical Engineering Poland
Remigiusz Kozlowski University of Lodz Poland
Stanisław Krzyżaniak Poznań School of Logistics Poland
Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek State University of Applied Sciences in Konin Poland
Jerzy Lewandowski Warsaw University of Technology Poland
Anna Lis Gdańsk University of Technology Poland
Reza Lotfi Department of industrial engineering Yazd University Iran
Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland
Iulian Malcoci PhD, Associate Professor / Mechanical Engineering Moldova
Damjan Maletic University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences Slovenia
Paweł Mielcarek Poznań University of Economics and Business Poland
Anna Nagyova Technical University of Kosice Slovakia
Andrei Stefan Nestian Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iasi, Romania Romania
Filip Osiński Poznan University of Technology Poland
Ivan Pavlenko Sumy State University Ukraine
Dragan Peraković University of Zagreb, Faculty of transport and traffic sciences Croatia
Niles Perera University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka
Jan Pitel Technical University of Kosice, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Slovakia Slovakia
Paulina Rewers Poznan University od Technology Poland
Piotr Rogala Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocłąwiu Poland
Izabela Rojek Kazimierz WIelki University Poland
Łukasz Rymaniak Poznan University of Technology Poland
Krzysztof Santarek Politechnika Warszawska Poland
Michał Sąsiadek Uniwersytet Zielonogórski Poland
Shah Rukh Shakeel University of Vaasa Finland Finland
Parveen Sharma Lovely Professional University Phagwara India
Dorota Stadnicka Rzeszow University of Technology Poland
Binod Timilsina University of Vaasa Finland
Justyna Trojanowska Poznan University of Technology Poland
Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management Poland
Mariusz Uchroński Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Poland
Nicolae Stelian Ungureanu Technical University of Cluj-Napoca , Romania Romania
Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka Poland
Wiesław Urban Bialystok University of Technology Poland
Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber FEM, PUT Poland
Ewa Więcek-Janka PUT Poland
Marek Wirkus Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Zarządzenia i Ekonomii Poland
Rika Yunitarini Trunojoyo University Indonesia Indonesia
Jozef Zajac TU Kosice Slovakia
Paweł Zmarzły Kielce University of Technology Poland
Krzysztof Żywicki Poznan University of Technology Poland