Details

Title

Which One to Choose Multi Focus or Trade-Off Among Competitive Priorities? Evidence from Finnish SMEs

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review

Yearbook

2016

Numer

No 1

Authors

Keywords

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Publisher

Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management

Date

2016

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/mper-2016-0009

Source

Management and Production Engineering Review; 2016; No 1

References

Kipley (2012), Entropy - disrupting Ansoff s five levels of environmental turbulence Strategy Series, Business, 13, 251. ; González (2010), da The environment as a determining factor of purchasing and supply strategy : An empirical analysis of Brazilian firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 124, 1, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.032 ; Lasagni (2012), How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs ? New evidence for Europe *, Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 310, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x ; Emery (1965), The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments, Human Relations, 18, 21, doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103 ; Kathuria (2000), Competitive priorities and managerial performance : a taxonomy of small manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 627, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00042-5 ; Andreeva (2012), Does knowledge management really matter ? Linking knowledge management practices competitiveness and economic performance of, Journal Knowledge Management, 16, 617, doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246185 ; Hardwick (1998), The competitiveness of EU insurance industries, Service Industries Journal, 18, 39, doi.org/10.1080/02642069800000003 ; Amoako (2007), Examining cumulative capabilities in a developing economy, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 68, 928, doi.org/10.1108/01443570710775801 ; Takala (2002), Analysing and synthesising multifocused manufacturing strategies by analytical hierarchy process of Manufacturing Technology and Management, International Journal, 4, 345. ; Mithas (2011), How information management capability influences firm performance, MIS quarterly, 35, 237. ; Lawrence (2007), Small business operations strategy : Aligning priorities and resources of, Journal Small Business Strategy, 18, 89. ; Balkyte (2010), Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development : facets of sustainable competitiveness, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 341, doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.17 ; Castellacci (2008), Innovation and the competitiveness of industries : Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 984, doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002 ; Mintzberg (1994), The fall and rise of strategic planning, Harvard Business Review, 72, 107. ; Buckley (1988), Measures of international competitiveness : A critical survey *, Journal of Marketing Management, 4, 175, doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964068 ; Man (2002), The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises : A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 123, doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00058-6 ; Corbett (1993), Trade - offs ? What trade - offs ? Competence and competitiveness in manufacturing strategy, California Management Review, 35, 107, doi.org/10.2307/41166757 ; Wright (2005), Strategy in emerging economies : Challenging the conventional wisdom *, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1, doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x ; Parnell (2000), Strategy as a response to organizational uncertainty : An alternative perspective on the strategy - performance relationship, Management Decision, 38, 520, doi.org/10.1108/00251740010352811 ; Huggins (2003), Creating a UK Competitiveness Index : Regional and Local Benchmarking, Regional Studies, 37, 89, doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000033420 ; Chi (2010), Corporate competitive strategies in a transitional manufacturing industry : An empirical study, Management Decision, 48, 976, doi.org/10.1108/00251741011053497 ; Chi (2009), Measurement of business environment characteristics in the US technical textile industry : An empirical study The, Journal of the Textile Institute, 100, 545, doi.org/10.1080/00405000802078783 ; Hallgren (2011), A hybrid model of competitive capabilities, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 511, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111126300 ; Xiaosong (2011), Competitive priorities plant improvement and innovation capabilities and operational performance : A test of two forms of fit, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 484, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111126292 ; Ajitabh (2004), Competitiveness of firms : Review of Theory Frameworks and Models, Singapore management Review, 26, 45. ; Chae (2014), Information technology capability and firm performance : Contradictory findings and their possible causes, Mis Quarterly, 38, 305. ; Kocabasoglu (2007), Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments : the role of business uncertainty, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1141, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.015 ; Cerrato (2011), Unbundling the construct of firm - level international competitiveness, Multinational Business Review, 19, 311, doi.org/10.1108/15253831111190162 ; Rosenzweig (2010), Tradeoffs in Manufacturing ? A Meta - Analysis and Critique of the Literature, Production and Operations Management, 19, 127, doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01072.x ; Commander (2011), Business environment exports ownership and firm performance The, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 309, doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00135 ; Feurer (1994), Defining competitiveness : A holistic approach, Management Decision, 32, 49, doi.org/10.1108/00251749410054819 ; Ward (1995), Business environment operations strategy and performance : An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 13, 99, doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00021-J ; Selznick (1948), Foundations of the theory of organization, American Sociological Review, 13, 25, doi.org/10.2307/2086752 ; Chang (1995), Competitiveness of product firm industry and nation in a global business Competitiveness Review : An International, Business Journal, 5, 37. ; Ling (2000), Manufacturing capability development in a changing business environment, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 261, doi.org/10.1108/02635570010301188 ; Tracey (1999), Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation : keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 411, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00045-X ; Álvarez (2009), The role of networking in the competitiveness of firms, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 410, doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.002 ; Child (1972), Organization structure environment and performance : The role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6, 1, doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101 ; Prajogo (2011), Examining competitive priorities and competitive advantage in service organisations using Importance - Performance Analysis matrix Managing Service Quality : An, International Journal, 21, 465. ; Bourgeois (1981), On the measurement of organizational slack, Academy of Management Review, 6, 29. ; Santos (2012), How organizational learning affects a firm s flexibility competitive strategy and performance, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1079, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.002 ; Santa (2010), Contribution of cross - functional teams to the improvement in operational performance Team Performance Management : An, international Journal, 16, 148. ; Yee (2012), The influence of quality marketing and knowledge capabilities in business competitiveness of Innovation and Learning, International Journal, 11, 288. ; Barney (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of management, 17, 99, doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 ; Kroes (2010), Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities : Impact on supply chain and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 124, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.004 ; Rosenbusch (2013), The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Task Environment - Performance Relationship : A Meta - Analysis, Journal of Management, 39, 633, doi.org/10.1177/0149206311425612 ; Boyer (2002), Competitive priorities : investigating the need for trade - offs in operations strategy Production and, operations management, 11, 9. ; Duncan (1972), Characteristicsof organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainties, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313, doi.org/10.2307/2392145 ; Makkonen (2014), Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2707, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.020 ; Venkatraman (1989), The concept of fit in strategy research : Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, Academy of Management Review, 14, 423. ; Cachon (2011), The value of fast fashion : Quick response enhanced design and strategic consumer behavior, Management Science, 57, 778, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1303 ; Momaya (2011), Cooperation for competitiveness of emerging countries : learning from a case of nanotechnology Competitiveness Review : An International, Business Journal, 21, 152. ; Horne (1992), Understanding the competitive process a guide to effective intervention in the small firms sector, European Journal of Operational Research, 56, 54, doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90292-H ; Theodosiou (2012), Strategic orientations marketing capabilities and firm performance : An empirical investigation in the context of frontline managers in service organizations, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1058, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.001 ; Miller (1994), A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies, Management Science, 40, 285, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.3.285 ; Hashi (2013), The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi - stage model : Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey, Research Policy, 42, 353, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at: www.journals.pan.pl/mper
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to the Editorial Office. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2021, Volume 12, including postage and handling, is 200 PLN.

Open Access Policy

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
SCIMAGO:
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)


Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/

Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (office@mper.org). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (e-mail: office@mper.org) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

Zahid Hussain Agha Sarhad University of Science and IT Peshawar Pakistan
Mehmet Ali Akinlar Yildiz Technical University Turkey
Zoran Anisic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences Serbia
Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology Poland
Rajesh As Maharaja Institute of Technology Thandavapura India
Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee Mazandaran University of Science and Technology Iran
Zbigniew Banaszak Koszalin University of Technology Poland
Jolanta Baran Silesian University of Technology Poland
Mariusz Bednarek WSB Warszawa Poland
Srinivasa Murthy Boorla Grupo Antolin Spain
Oumaima Bounou FST-Fez Marocco
Robert Cep VSB-TU OSTRAVA Czech Republic
Fatih Çetin Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Turkey
Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania
Pedro Cunha Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal Portugal
Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business Poland
Asta Daunorienė Assoc. prof., Kaunas University of Technology Lithuania
Ahmed Deif Associate Prof. California Polytechnic State University USA
Yuliia Denysenko Sumy State University Ukraine
Jacek Diakun Poznań University of Technology Poland
Ewa Dostatni Poznan University of Technology Poland
Joanna Duda AGH University of Science and Technology Poland
Milan Edl University of West Bohemia Czech Republic
Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology Poland
Nurprihatin Filscha Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Bunda Mulia Indonesia
Adi Fitra Magister Industrial Engineering ,Mercubuana University Indonesia
Mosè Gallo Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico II Italy
Józef Gawlik Cracow Univesity of Technology Poland
Andrzej Gessner Poznan University of Technology Poland
Arkadiusz Gola Lublin University of Technology, Poland Poland
Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran
Błażej Góralski Poznan University of Technology Chair of Production Engineering Poland
Pop Grigore Marian Technical university of Cluj-Napoca Romania
Łukasz Grudzień Poznan University of Technology Poland
Vitalii Ivanov Sumy State University Ukraine
Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek Poznan University of Technology Poland
Jozef Jurko Technical University in Košice Poland
Oksana Karpenko RUDN University Russia
Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology Poland
Sławomir Klos University of Zielona Góra, Institute of Mechanical Engineering Poland
Remigiusz Kozlowski University of Lodz Poland
Stanisław Krzyżaniak Poznań School of Logistics Poland
Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek State University of Applied Sciences in Konin Poland
Jerzy Lewandowski Warsaw University of Technology Poland
Anna Lis Gdańsk University of Technology Poland
Reza Lotfi Department of industrial engineering Yazd University Iran
Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland
Iulian Malcoci PhD, Associate Professor / Mechanical Engineering Moldova
Damjan Maletic University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences Slovenia
Paweł Mielcarek Poznań University of Economics and Business Poland
Anna Nagyova Technical University of Kosice Slovakia
Andrei Stefan Nestian Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iasi, Romania Romania
Filip Osiński Poznan University of Technology Poland
Ivan Pavlenko Sumy State University Ukraine
Dragan Peraković University of Zagreb, Faculty of transport and traffic sciences Croatia
Niles Perera University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka
Jan Pitel Technical University of Kosice, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Slovakia Slovakia
Paulina Rewers Poznan University od Technology Poland
Piotr Rogala Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocłąwiu Poland
Izabela Rojek Kazimierz WIelki University Poland
Łukasz Rymaniak Poznan University of Technology Poland
Krzysztof Santarek Politechnika Warszawska Poland
Michał Sąsiadek Uniwersytet Zielonogórski Poland
Shah Rukh Shakeel University of Vaasa Finland Finland
Parveen Sharma Lovely Professional University Phagwara India
Dorota Stadnicka Rzeszow University of Technology Poland
Binod Timilsina University of Vaasa Finland
Justyna Trojanowska Poznan University of Technology Poland
Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management Poland
Mariusz Uchroński Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Poland
Nicolae Stelian Ungureanu Technical University of Cluj-Napoca , Romania Romania
Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka Poland
Wiesław Urban Bialystok University of Technology Poland
Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber FEM, PUT Poland
Ewa Więcek-Janka PUT Poland
Marek Wirkus Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Zarządzenia i Ekonomii Poland
Rika Yunitarini Trunojoyo University Indonesia Indonesia
Jozef Zajac TU Kosice Slovakia
Paweł Zmarzły Kielce University of Technology Poland
Krzysztof Żywicki Poznan University of Technology Poland


×