Details
Title
The impact of background category information on the creation of social cliques: The role of need for cognitive closure and decisivenessJournal title
Polish Psychological BulletinYearbook
2012Issue
No 1Authors
Divisions of PAS
Nauki Humanistyczne i SpołecznePublisher
Committee for Psychological Science PASDate
2012Identifier
DOI: 10.2478/v10059-012-0002-9Source
Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2012; No 1References
Bar-Tal Y. (1994), The effect on mundane decision-making of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure, European Journal of Personality, 8, 45, doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080105 ; Bar-Tal Y. (2002), Who exhibits more stereotypical thinking? The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure on stereotyping, European Journal of Personality, 16, 313, doi.org/10.1002/per.453 ; Bar-Tal Y. (2010), Personality Traits: Classification, Effects and Changes, 47. ; Bates, D. M. (2010). <i>lme4: Mixed-effects modelling with R.</i> Book available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/'>http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/</a> ; Bukowski, M., von Hecker, U., & Kossowska, M. (2011). The role of need for cognitive closure in the construction of social mental models. Unpublished manuscript, Jagiellonian University, Poland. ; Dechesne, M., Schultz, J. M., Kruglanski, A. W., Orehek, E., & Fishman, S. (2008). A psychology of borders: Need for closure and the allure of group impermeability. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Maryland, MD, USA. ; K. de Dreu (1999), On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348, doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003007 ; Dijksterhuis A. (1996), Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254, doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0012 ; Gelman A. (2007), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. ; Gigerenzer G. (1999), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. ; Heider F. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, doi.org/10.1037/10628-000 ; Hummert M. (1990), Processing mechanisms underlying use of the balance schema, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 5, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.5 ; Jiang J. (2007), Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer Series in Statistics. ; Johnson-Laird P. (1983), Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. ; Kossowska M. (2003), Różnice indywidualne w motywacji poznawczej (Individual differences in cognitive motivation), Przegląd Psychologiczny, 46, 355. ; Kossowska M. (2010), Motywacje umysłu (Motivations of the mind), 15. ; Kossowska M. (2003), The relationship between need for closure and conservatism in Western and Eastern Europe, Political Psychology, 24, 501, doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00338 ; Kossowska M. (2002), The need for cognitive closure scale: structure, cross-cultural invariance, and comparison of mean ratings between European-American and East Asian Samples, Psychologica Belgica, 42, 267. ; Kruglanski A. (2004), The psychology of closed mindedness. ; Kruglanski A. (1983), The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448, doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7 ; Kruglanski A. (1991), Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.212 ; Kruglanski A. (1996), Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and freezing, Psychological Review, 103, 263, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263 ; Mannetti L. (2002), A cross-cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and The Netherlands, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 139, doi.org/10.1348/014466602165108 ; R Development Core Team. (2008). R: <i>A language and environment for statistical computing.</i> R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.R-project.org'>http://www.R-project.org</a> ; Roets A. (2006), Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies, Psychologica Belgica, 46, 235. ; Roets A. (2007), Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 266, doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294744 ; Roets A. (2006), The dimensional structure of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Relationships with ‘seizing’ and ‘freezing’ processes, Social Cognition, 24, 22, doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.1.22 ; Smith E. (1998), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 391. ; U. von Hecker (1997), How do logical rules help to construct social mental models?, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 367, doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1325 ; U. von Hecker (1996), Social cliques as mental models, European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 741, doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199609)26:5<741::AID-EJSP787>3.0.CO;2-8 ; U. von Hecker (2004), Integrative social perception: Individuals low in working memory benefit more from external representations, Social Cognition, 22, 336, doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.3.336.35969 ; U. von Hecker (1999), Uncontrollability, depression and the construction of mental models, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 833, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.833 ; Wichary S. (2008), Individual differences in decisiveness: Pre-decisional information search and decision strategy use, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39, 47, doi.org/10.2478/v10059-008-0007-6 ; Wichary S. (2005), Strategie decyzyjne a funkcjonowanie pamięci roboczej (Decision making strategies and working memory), Studia Psychologiczne, 43, 97. ; Webster D. (1994), Individual differences in need for cognitive closure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261. ; R. Wyer, Jr (1999), The comprehension and validation of social information, Psychological Review, 106, 89, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.89Aims and scope
Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Dimensions
• EBSCO
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• ProQuest
• PsychArchives
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
• Sherpa/RoMEO