Details
Title
Number and content of personality types across methods and samples: Empirically filling the theoretically developed map of RUNO typologyJournal title
Polish Psychological BulletinYearbook
2021Volume
vol. 52Issue
No 3Affiliation
Strus, Włodzimierz : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Cybis, Natalia : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Cieciuch, Jan : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Rowiński, Tomasz : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in WarsawAuthors
Keywords
Big Five ; RUO personality types ; RUNO typology ; Two Factor Model ; Circumplex of Personality MetatraitsDivisions of PAS
Nauki Humanistyczne i SpołeczneCoverage
211-226Publisher
Committee for Psychological Science PASBibliography
Alessandri, G., & Vecchione, M. (2017). Resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types across cultures. In A. T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures: Culture and characteristic adaptations (pp. 211-246). Santa Barbara, CA, US: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15(3), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.408
Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, S43–S55. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.449
Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Book.
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117
Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003596626
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego- resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect and social relations: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The “big five questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 281– 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Vecchione, M. (2007). BFQ-2 Big Five Questionnaire –2. Manuale. Firenze: Giunti O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.
Cieciuch, J., & Strus, W. (2017). Two-Factor Model of Personality. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2129-1
Cieciuch, J., Strus, W., Rowiński, T., & Vecchione, M. (2012). Polish version of the Big Five Questionnaire-2. 16th European Conference on Personality, Trieste, Italy, 10-14.07.2012
Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), S73–S87. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.448
Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Re-sources.
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (2002). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 1-26). Seattle – Toronto – Bern – Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184
DeYoung, C. G. (2005). Cognitive ability and externalizing behavior in a psychobiological personality framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi- informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
DeYoung, C., Quilty, L., & Peterson, J. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
Donnellan, M.B. & Robins, R.W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Person-ality and Social Psychology Compass, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2010.00313.x
Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2018). A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0419-z
Gerlitz J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Dokumentation der Instrumen-tenentwicklung BFI-S auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2005. DIW Research, Notes 4.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Gramzow, R. H., Sedikides, C., Panter, A. T., Sathy, V., Harris, J., & Insko, C. A. (2004). Patterns of self-regulation and the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 18(5), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.513
Grumm, M., von Collani. G. (2009). Personality types and self-reported aggressiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.001
Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The Five- Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00245-1
Herzberg, P. Y., & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? an extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.557
Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163 https://doi.org/10.1037/002-3514.63.1.146.
Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self- Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical development, long-itudinal stability and predictive ability. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2054
John, O., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102– 138). Guilford Press.
Leikas, S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Personality types during transition to young adulthood: How are they related to life situation and well- being? Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 753–762. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.003
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The Five-Factor Model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Ozer, D. J. (2006). Person-factors in the California Adult Q-Set: Closing the door on personality trait types? European Journal of Personality, 20, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.553
Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022
Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer- Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157
Rowiński, T., Cieloch, M., Cybis, N., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2014). Polska adaptacja i wersja skrócona kwestionariusza IPIP-NEO-PI-R. Referat na XXXV Zjeździe Naukowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego „Psychologia w zmieniającym się świecie”, Bydgoszcz, 18-21.09.2014.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sava, F. A., & Popa, R. I. (2011). Personality types based on the big five model. A cluster analysis over the Romanian population. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 359–384.
Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-PI-R Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. [The NEO-PI-R Personality Inventory by Paul T. Costa Jr. and Robert McCrae: Polish adaptation. Manual]. Warsaw: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Specht, J., Luhmann, M., & Geiser, C. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036863
Steca, P., Alessandri, G., & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well- known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 442–446. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.016
Strelau, J. (2002). Psychologia różnic indywidualnych [The psychology of individual differences]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2017). Towards a synthesis of persona-lity, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.002.
Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2019). Are the questionnaire and the psycho- lexical Big Twos the same? Towards an integration of personality structure within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Interna-tional Journal of Personality Psychology, 5, 18-35. https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.5.35594
Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2021). Higher-order factors of the Big Six – Similarities between Big Twos identified above the Big Five and the Big Six. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110544
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2012). Polish version of Big five Aspects Scales from International Personality Item Pool. 16th European Conference on Personality, Trieste, Italy, 10-14.07.2012.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014a). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014b). Circumplex structure of personality traits measured with the IPIP-45AB5C questionnaire in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.018
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014c). The Polish adaptation of the IPIP-BFM-50 questionnaire for measuring five personality traits in the lexical approach. Annals of Psychology, 2(17), 347–366.
Strus, W., Cybis, N., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2021). Theoretical framework for a RUNO personality typology based on the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2021.137885.
Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality (IASR-B5). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781– 790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.781
Zawadzki, B. (2016). Gamma i Delta w ujęciu Kołowego Modelu Metacech a przekonania w zaburzeniach osobowości [Gamma and Delta in the perspective of the Circumplex of Personality Metratraits and beliefs in personality disorders]. In A. Rynkiewicz, K. Jankowski, & W. Oniszczenko (Eds.), Wybrane metody i para-dygmaty badawcze w psychologii [Selected research methods and paradigms in psychology] (pp. 203–220). Warsaw, PL: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Zawadzki, B. (2017). The location of personality disorders in the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Annals of Psychology, 20(2), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2017.20.2-7en
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P., & Śliwińska, M., (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae: adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. [Personality Inventory NEO-FFI by Costa and McCrae: Polish adaptation. Manual]. Warsaw: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Date
2021.10.06Type
ArticleIdentifier
DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.137886Aims and scope
Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Dimensions
• EBSCO
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• ProQuest
• PsychArchives
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)
• Sherpa/RoMEO