Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 63
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the article there are presented the most popular Jewish names selected from the municipal books of Grabowiec and fi les of city Grabowiec XVII and XVIII century. As a result of gathered materials it has been found that Jews adapted their names to the patterns existing on the area of residence. The formant –ko was especially popular. That formant was the most popular in Ukrainian antroponymy: Heszko, Icko, Judko, Lewko. To the most popular names used by Jews as Icko (17), Lewko (11), Marko (5), Moszko (4) the names of the origin of the Bible: Dawid (6), Juda (5), Aron (4), Boruch (3), Hebraic: Jakub (9), Chaim (5), Maier (4), Yiddish: Leyba (6), Zusman (3). can be added. Frequencies complement the variants of the specifi c names.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Olejnik
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper sheds light on the social cohesion shifts that have occurred in Ukrainian society since 24th February 2022. Drawing on the case study method, the research juxtaposes pre-war surveys with data collected in Ukraine during March-December 2022. The study confirms the comprehensive strengthening of social cohesion at both attitudinal and behavioral levels accompanied by unprecedently high institutional trust, civic identity, and mass-spread volunteering. The article demonstrates that the value of Ukraine’s independence became a crucial point for national consolidation under war conditions. The increased mutual support, emotional connectedness, and enhanced horizontal bonds point at the growth of cohesion. It is proposed to treat the practices of resistance, citizens’ expectations about the state’s future, their feelings associated with this the state and their belief in victory as additional indicators of social cohesion measurement during wartime. Alongside the positive trends, the social cohesion risk zones are identified, too, and countermeasures discussed.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Aasland, Aadne, Oleksii Lyska. 2016. Local democracy in Ukrainian cities: civic participation and responsiveness of local authorities. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 2: 152–175.
2. Aasland, Aadne, Sabine Kropp, eds. 2021. Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Aasland, Aadne, Oleksandra Deineko, Olga Filippova, Sabine Kropp. 2021. Citizens’ perspectives: reform and social cohesion in Ukraine’s border regions. In: A. Aasland, S. Kropp, eds. Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan, 237–272.
4. ARDU – The accommodation of regional diversity in Ukraine. 2018-2021. https://uni.oslomet.no/ardu/, accessed 16.12.2022.
5. Baliichuk, Vladislav. 2020. The Methodology of the ARDU Survey. https://uni.oslomet.no/ardu/publications/, accessed 23.12.2022.
6. Bauer, Michal, Christopher Blattman, Julie Chytilová, Joseph Henrich, Edward Miguel, Tamar Mitts. 2016. Can war foster cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 3: 249–274.
7. Bellows, John, Edward Miguel. 2006. War and institutions: New evidence from Sierra Leone. American Economic Review, 96, 2: 394–399.
8. Bellows, John, Edward Miguel. 2009. War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 11-12: 1144–1157.
9. Berger-Schmitt, Regina. 2002. Considering Social Cohesion in Quality-of-Life Assessments: Concept and Measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58: 403–28.
10. Bernard, Paul. 1999. La cohésion sociale: critique dialectique d’un quasi-concept. Lien social et Politiques, 41: 47–59.
11. Blattman, Christopher. 2009. From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103, 2: 231–247.
12. Bondarenko, Mykhailo, Svitlana Babenko, Oleksiy Borovskiy. 2017. Social cohesion in Ukraine (the experience of application of Bertelsmann Stiftung method to European Social Survey data). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University (Sociology), 1, 8: 58–65.
13. Chan, Joseph, Ho-Pong To, Elaine Chan. 2006. Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75, 2: 273–302.
14. Coleman, James S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
15. Decree of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2014. On confirmation of Ukraine’s course towards integration into the European Union and priority measures in this direction. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/874-18#Text, accessed 12.12.2022.
16. Deineko, Оleksandra. 2021. ‘Being together’ in the pandemic conditions: social cohesion challenges of the contemporary Ukrainian society. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, 25: 37–48.
17. Deineko, Oleksandra. 2022. War in Ukraine: a Sociological Study. Report: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research. https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/11250/2992091, accessed 23.12.2022.
18. Dickes, Paul, Marie Valentova. 2013. Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113, 3: 827–846.
19. Dragolov, Georgi, Zsófia Ignácz, Jan Lorenz, Jan Delhey, Klaus Boehnke. 2013. Social cohesion radar measuring common ground: An international comparison of social cohesion methods report. http://aei.pitt.edu/74134/1/Social_cohesion_radar.pdf, accessed 30.09.2022.
20. European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13897, accessed 02.03.2023.
21. Fiedler, Charlotte, Christopher Rohles. 2021. Social cohesion after armed conflict: a literature review. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/DP_7.2021_1.1.pdf, accessed 30.02.2023.
22. Fonseca, Xavier, Stephan Lukosch, Frances Brazier. 2019. Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32, 2: 231–253.
23. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
24. Golovakha, Yevhen, Natalia Panina, Olena Parakhonska. 2019. Ukrainian Society in 1992–2018: Monitoring Social Changes. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
25. Gorbachyk, Andriy. 2022. War as a factor changing the structure and level of trust. In: Ye. Golovakha, S. Makeiev, eds. Ukrainian society in wartime. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 347–358.
26. Green, Andy, Jan Germen Janmaat, Christine Han. 2009. Regimes of Social Cohesion. London: UCL London Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.
27. Grosjean, Pauline. 2014. Conflict and social and political preferences: Evidence from World War II and civil conflict in 35 European countries. Comparative Economic Studies, 56, 3: 424–451.
28. Hager, Anselm, Krzysztof Krakowski, Max Schaub. 2019. Ethnic riots and prosocial behavior: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan. American Political Science Review, 113, 4: 1029–1044.
29. Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. 2019. Civil society in Ukraine: citizens’ view. https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-v-ukraini-poglyadgromadyan, accessed 12.12.2022.
30. Jeannotte, M. Sharon. 2003.Singing Alone? The Contribution of Cultural Capital to Social Cohesion and Sustainable Communities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9: 35–49.
31. Jenson, Jane. 1998. Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
32. Kaarbo, Juliet, Ryan K. Beasley. 1999. A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20: 369–391.
33. Kharkiv Today. 2022. Until the end of the war the charge for utilities in Kharkiv won’t be charged, https://2day.kh.ua/ru/kharkow/do-konca-voyny-v-kharkove-ne-budut-brat-platu-za-kommunalnye-uslugi, accessed 02.01.2023.
34. Kuzio, Taras. 2001. Identity and nation-building in Ukraine. Ethnicities, 1, 3: 343–365.
35. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2022. Attitude of Ukrainians who are currently in Ukraine towards Ukrainian refugees in Europe. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1160&page=1, accessed 02.01.2023.
36. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2022. Indicators of national-civic identity of Ukrainians. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1131&page=1, accessed 02.03.2023.
37. Law of Ukraine. 2015. About the legal regime of martial law. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text, accessed 12.12.2022.
38. Leininger, Julia et al. 2021. Social cohesion: A new definition and a proposal for its measurement in Africa. Discussion Paper, 31/2021. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstre-am/10419/247791/1/1780471599.pdf, accessed 02.03.2023.
39. Nair, Gautam, Nicholas Sambanis. 2019. Violence exposure and ethnic identification: Evidence from Kashmir. International Organization, 73, 2: 329–363.
40. Patulny, V. Roger, Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen. 2007. Exploring the social capital grid: bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 1/2: 32–51.
41. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. City: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
42. Radio Svoboda. 2022. Zelenskyi: On February 24 the second all-Ukrainian referendum took place. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/32002053.html, accessed 23.12.2022.
43. Radio Svoboda. 2022. The State Security Service conducts new “security measures” at the facilities of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchy in nine regions. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-sbu-bezpekovi-zahody-upts-mp/32176044.html, accessed 02.01.2023.
44. Rashid, Yasir, Ammar Rashid, Muhammad Akib, Warraich Sana, Sameen Sabir, Ansar Waseem. 2019. Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18: 1–13.
45. Rivne Media. 2022. Almost 7 million hryvnias were collected per day for the freed Mykhailo Dianov. https://rivne.media/news/dlya-zvilnenoho-z-polonu-morpikha-mikhayla-dianova-zibrali-mayzhe-7-mln-hriven-za-dobu-67528, accessed 02.01.2023.
46. Rohner, Dominic, Mathias Thoenig, Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2013. Seeds of Distrust: Conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Growth, 18, 3: 217–252.
47. Simmel, Georg. 1903. The Sociology of Conflict: II. American Journal of Sociology, 9: 672–689.
48. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2021 (December 14-16th). Socio-political attitudes of the population.https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/obschestvenno-politiche- skie_nastroeniya_naseleniya_14-16_dekabrya_2021.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
49. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (March 1st). National survey: Ukraine in the conditions of war.https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/obschenacionalnyy_opros_ukraina_v_usloviyah_voyny_1_marta_2022.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
50. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (April 6th). The eighth national survey: Ukraine in war conditions.https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/vosmoy_obschena-cionalnyy_opros_ukraina_v_usloviyah_voyny_6_aprelya_2022.html, accessed 02.01.2023. 51. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (May 18-19th). The twelfth national survey: dynamics of assessment of the image of the state https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/dvenadcatyy_obschenacionalnyy_opros_dinamika_ocenki_obraza_gosudarstva_18-19_maya_2022.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
52. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (August 17-18th). The seventeenth national survey: Identity. Patriotism. Values. https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/s_mnadcyate_zagalnonac_onalne_opituvannya_dentichn_st_patr_otizm_c_nnost_17-18_serpnya_2022.html, accessed 02.01.2023.
53. Sociological Group ‘Rating’. 2022 (November 20-21st). The nineteenth National Survey: Results of the year. Expectations from the future. https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/nineteenth_national_survey_results_of_the_year_expectations_for_ the_future_november_20-21_2022.html, accessed 12.12.2022.
54. Sociological Group ‘Rating’ (November 20-21st). The nineteenth national survey: Celebrating Christmas in Ukraine. https://ratinggroup.ua/research/ukraine/dev_yatnadcyate_zagalnonac_onalne_opituvannya_svyatkuvannya_r_zdva_v_ukra_n_20-21_listopada_2022.html, accessed 02.01.2023.
55. Suspilne. 2022. Ukrainians collected money for four ‘Bayraktars’ for the Armed Forces during three days. https://suspilne.media/253839-ukrainci-za-tri-dni-zibrali-grosi-na-cotiri-bajraktari-dla-zsu, accessed 12.12.2022.
56. Suspilne. 2022. The story of IDPs from Kharkiv who settled in a high mountain village in Bukovina. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?extid=CL-UNK-UNK-UNK-AN_GK0T-GK1C-GK2C&v=1277097403030701, accessed 02.01.2023.
57. Thomas, William I., Dorothy S. Thomas. 1928. The child in America. Oxford: Knopf. 58. Trukha. 2022. Telegram channel in Kharkiv, message dated 17 March 2022.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandra Deineko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR) OsloMet, V.N. Karazin KharkivNational University, NIBR, Karazin Kharkiv National University
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents a systematic study of social cohesion phenomenon at the level of amalgamated hromadas as a key local entity of decentralization reform in Ukraine. Building on the analysis of the 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in amalgamated hromadas of two border regions of Ukraine – Kharkiv and Chernivtsi, the author has identified social cohesion components, their interconnection as well as positive and negative factors of social cohesion strengthening at community level. Relying on Chan’s empirical model and perceived perspective of social cohesion, hromada amalgamation is conceptualized as a transformation process of avoiding ‘old practices’ to form ‘new order’. In the process, the establishing of democratic tools, local activist growth, reducing gaps between center and periphery, formation of common sociocultural space are emphasized. Strengthening social cohesion components at the hromada level are stated to become a sure basis for ‘a giant leap’ of Ukraine’s democratisation in the nearest future.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Aasland, Aadne, and Oleksii Lyska. 2016. Local democracy in Ukrainian cities: civic participation and responsiveness of local authorities. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 2: 152–175.
2. Babenko, Svetlana. 2002. Life Strategies and Social Practices: Sociocultural Potential of the Post-Soviet Society Transformation. Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of society, 73, 2: 57–64.
3. Bader, Max. 2020. Decentralization and a Risk of Local Elite Capture in Ukraine. In: H. Shelest and M. Rabinovych, eds. Decentralization, Regional Diversity, and Conflict. The Case of Ukraine. Basingstocke: Palgrave McMillan, 259–282.
4. Berger-Schmitt, Regina. 2002. Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social indicators research, 58, 1-3: 403–428.
5. Bollen, K. A. and Hoyle, R. H. 1990. Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social forces, 23, 3: 479–504.
6. Bottoni, Gianmaria. 2018. A multilevel measurement model of social cohesion. Social Indicators Research, 136, 3: 835–857.
7. Chan, Joseph, Ho-Pong To, and Elaine Chan. 2006. Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social indicators research, 75, 2: 273–302. 8.
Council of Europe. 2008. Report of high-level task force on social cohesion: Towards an active, fair, and socially cohesive Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
9. Delhey, Jan, Klaus Boehnke, Georgi Dragolov, Zsófia S Ignácz, Mandi Larsen, Jan Lorenz, and Michael Koch. 2018. Social Cohesion and its Correlates: A Comparison of Western and Asian Societies. Comparative Sociology, 17, 3-4: 426–455.
10. Dickes, Paul, and Marie Valentova. 2013. Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social indicators research, 113, 3: 827–846.
11. Dragolov, Georgi, Zsófia Ignácz, Jan Lorenz, Jan Delhey, and Klaus Boehnke. 2013. Social cohesion radar measuring common ground: An international comparison of social cohesion methods report. http://aei.pitt.edu/74134/1/Social_cohesion_radar.pdf, accessed 30.09.2020.
12. Fonseca, Xavier, Stephan Lukosch, and Frances Brazier. 2019. Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32, 2: 231–253.
13. Golovakha, Evgeniy I., and Panina, Nataliya V. 2006. Main Stages and Trends in the Transformation of Ukrainian Society: from Perestroika to the Orange Revolution. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing 3: 32–51.
14. Jenson, Jane. 1998. Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks.
15. Kutsenko, Olga. 2004. Phases and Ways of Systemic Transformations: Similarities and Differences in the Former Countries of State Socialism. In: O. Kutsenko, S. Babenko, eds. Postcommunist Transformations: Vectors, Dimensions, Content. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publisher, 251–274.
16. Law of Ukraine ‘About Voluntary Amalgamation of Territorial Hromadas’. 2015. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/157-19#Text, accessed 30.09.2020.
17. Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. 2002. Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War. International Organization, 56, 2: 297–337.
18. Monitoring of the Decentralization Process and Local Self-Government Reform. 2020. https://decentralization .gov.ua/mainmonitoring, accessed 30.09.2020.
19. Oleinekova, Olga 2020. Decentralization Reform: An Effective Vehicle for Modernization and Democratization in Ukraine? In: H. Shelest and M. Rabinovych, eds. Decentralization, Regional Diversity, and Conflict. The Case of Ukraine. Basingstocke: Palgrave McMillan, 311–338.
20. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine ‘On Approval of the Concept of Reforming Local Self-Government and Territorial Organization of Power in Ukraine’. 2014. https://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80, accessed 30.09.2020.
21. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine ‘Concept of Reforming Local Self-Government and Territorial Structure of Power’. 2014. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80#Text, accessed 25.11.2020.
22. Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development-2012_persp_glob_dev-2012-en, accessed 30.09.2020.
23. Rabinovych, M., Shelest, H. 2020. Introduction: Regional Diversity, Decentralization, and Conflict in and around Ukraine. In: H. Shelest and M. Rabinovych, eds. Decentralization, Regional Diversity, and Conflict. The Case of Ukraine. Basingstocke: Palgrave McMillan.
24. Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R. and Beaujot, R. 2007. Measuring social cohesion: An experiment using the Canadian national survey of giving, volunteering, and participating. Social Indicators Research, 80, 3: 461–492.
25. Riabchuk, Mykola. 2015. The ‘Two Ukraines’ Reconsidered: The End of Ukrainian Ambivalence? Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15, 1: 138–156.
26. Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine ‘State Strategy for Regional Development 2015 - 2020’. 2014. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/385-2014-%D0%BF#Text, accessed 23.11.2020.
27. Report ‘Сonflicts in the Amalgamated Territorial Hromadas: Types, Reasons, Forms, Consequences’. 2018. Association of Impowering Self-Organization of Population.Kropyvnytskyi.
28. Romanova, Valentyna, and Andreas Umland. 2019. Decentralising Ukraine: Geopolitical Implications. Survival, 61, 5: 99–112.
29. Rotterdam Resilient Strategy. 2020. https://www.resilientrotterdam.nl/en/download, accessed 30.11.2020.
30. Tkachuk, A.F. 2018. From a Perspective Plan to the Community Development Strategy (Through the Prism of the Experience of the Amalgamated Territorial Hromadas in Khmelnytskyi Region). Kiev: Juston Publishing House LLC.
31. Zhurzhenko, Tatiana. 2014. Divided Nation? Reconsidering the Role of Identity Politics in the Ukraine Crisis. Die Friedens-Warte, 89, 1/2: 249–267.
32. Ukrainian society 1992–2013. Current state and dynamics of changes. Sociological monitoring. Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. 2013. https://i-soc.com.ua/assets/files/monitoring/soc-mon-2013.pdf, accessed 27.11.2020.
33. Umland, Andreas. 2019. International Implications of Ukraine’s Decentralization. VOXUkraine, January 30. https://voxukraine.org/en/international-implications-of-ukraine-s-decentralization/, accessed 27.11.2020.
34. Zhalilo Y.A, Shevchenko O.V., Romanova V.V. 2019. Decentralization of Power: Agenda for the Medium Term. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandra Deineko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Kazimierz Jaworski contributed to a great extent to popularising Yevhen Malaniuk’s poetry in the interwar period. Most of Jaworski’s translations of Malaniuk’s poems into Polish were published in the years 1933–1937 in the magazine Kamena in Chełm. The poet from Lublin undertook to translate less popular poems, unknown to Polish readers. He opted not to work with the Ukrainian poet’s patriotic works, familiar to Polish literary circles, and chose poems of intimate and existential nature instead. From the two collections which were known in Poland, Earth And Iron (1930) and The Earthly Madonna (1934), he selected poems which in a special way correlate with his own lyrical works from the To a Red And White Mistress (1924) collection. What deserves special attention among Kazimierz Jaworski’s translating techniques is his exceptional diligence in choosing suitable Polish semantic equivalents and in rendering an appropriate rhythm of poems. Most of his translations can be described as adequate. They are not absolute, but they convey the originality of a given work through preserving the form and contents of the translated poem in the most faithful way possible. Jaworski’s translations show his inclination to poetise and dynamise the text. The translator readily uses his own metaphors and expands phrases with emotionally charged elements. Kazimierz Andrzej Jaworski was also a tireless propagator of information concerning the most recent translations of Yevhen Malaniuk’s poetry as well as the publishing activities of one of the most valued representatives of the Ukrainian immigration in Poland.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Choma-Suwała
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this article is a translation in the nation-creating function. From the middle of 18th century Ukrainian writers want to improve position of Ukrainian language in the state, show his uniqueness. Their method to achieved the object was translation masterpices of European literature into Ukrainian. This was evidence that Ukrainian language is independent language and could exist.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Regina Faltyn
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Evliya Çelebi’s Seyāḥatnāme, i.e. ‘Book of Travels’, contains, among others, a handful of Slavic words that are marked as Ukrainian. As a matter of fact, some of them display mixed features, probably resulting from the contamination of Ukrainian and Russian variants. Such hybrid words (e.g., [9] below) are attested together with purely Ukrainian (e.g., [2]) and purely Russian (e.g., [18]) forms. This situation prompted this author to classify Evliya Çelebi’s lexical materials as surzhyk vocabulary and, thus, antedate the emergence of surzhyk (see section 3).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Stachowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article deals with the history of competition and standardization between the variants од‑/ від‑ (both as preposition and prefix) in the Ukrainian language. Historically they are related to different groups of dialects. In the southwestern dialectal zone, with the exception of the northern dialects of the Volyn and Carpathian areas, the variant від‑ prevails, while the variant од‑ is predominant in the north of the country. The variant од‑ was typical for standard Ukrainian of the 19th‑early 20th century. After a period of competition with від‑ it lost out because of the artificial limitation of its use. This happened in the early 20th century due to the desire to employ forms that would give the literary language a national character, since the від‑ variant is notably different from both Polish and Russian. The history of од‑/ від‑ competition is investigated on the material of dictionaries, 1920s’ grammars and modern linguistic research. The history of од‑/ від‑ preposition and prefix variants was researched as well within the Ukrainian language corpus, which includes texts from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Shown are the points of variation related to regional and chronological properties, to authors’ individual preferences and to certain lexemes.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Liudmyla Dyka
1
Maria Shvedova
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is devoted to the structural basics of The Large Polish‑Ukrainian Phraseological Dictionary. Until recently, there had been no significant bilingual phraseological dictionary, which had made it difficult to comparatively study the phraseological systems of Polish and Ukrainian. The dictionary is based on lexicographic publications of various types, national language corpuses, and content. The article explains the principles of selecting phraseological units for the dictionary. Some phraseological units/idioms became the subject of lexicographic study for the first time. In detail is described the structure of the word explanations. During the selection of Ukrainian equivalents to the Polish output, taken into account is the fact that there are phraseological interlanguage homonyms – phraseological units/idioms that sound the same or similar in the two languages but that have different meanings. The dictionary contains an alphabetical register that includes all the components of the expressions/units. Thanks to such referencing, the reader can find the appropriate phrases in a single one word. The article describes the possibilities for the theoretical and applied solutions in the dictionary’s composition.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iryna Kononenko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Warszawa, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Since modern Slavic studies lack a uniform concept of the Ukrainian redaction of the Church Slavonic language, this article analyzes the major achievements of Ukrainian linguistics in the study of this phenomenon. Applying the method of linguistic historiography, the author describes the emergence of a national concept, according to which written sources – reflecting the features of the Ukrainian language from different periods of its formation – attest to the existence of a single Ukrainian redaction. The development of views on the Church Slavonic language is evidenced by the works of M. Maksymovych, I. Ohienko, G.Y. Shevelov, V. Nimchuk. Today different schools are primarily concerned with the quantitative interpretation of particular features of the Ukrainian redaction. Such an interpretation is largely premised on the 19th‑century Russian philological tradition which does not take into consideration the historical differentiation of East Slavic. Burdened with problematic terms like Russian, such an approach remains in contrast with Ukrainian linguistics, which accepts the existence of the Ukrainian redaction of Church Slavonic since the times of Kyivan Rus’.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Halyna Naienko
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Łódź, Uniwersytet Łódzki
  2. Kyiv, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is dedicated to Ihor Kostetskyi, the organizer and general secretary (1957‑1979) of the Ukrainian Shakespeare Society. The article presents the history of the foundation of the Ukrainian Shakespeare Society. Special attention is paid to the organizational, publishing, and translation activities of Ihor Kostetskyi. The article analyzes archival materials proving Kostetskyi’s active participation in the Ukrainian Shakespeare Society. The article describes the main directions of the society’s activities and notes the need for further study into the history of the Ukrainian Shakespeare Society.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ludmiła Mnich
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Siedlce, Uniwersytet w Siedlcach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article offers a survey of works of Ukrainian linguists in the field of Church Slavonic, in particular its Ukrainian recension. While applying the historiographic approach, the author focuses on various publications and the study of the language of some records and their authors, and the reconstruction of orthoepy. The article also discusses some controversial questions of the interrelation between the Ukrainian (southern) and the Great Russian (northern) redaction of the Church Slavonic language from the second half of the 17th century onward. The author also highlights changes in the methodological principles and argues that, despite the use of sociolinguistic and cognitive methods along with the traditional structural and functional approach, the current discourse in Ukrainian linguistics appears to be incomplete.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Halyna Naienko
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Łódź, Uniwersytet Łódzki
  2. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is an attempt to reflect on the beginnings of Ukrainian modernism. The article is an analysis of the “Open letter to Ukrainian writers” by Mykola Voronyi and his polemics with a well-known Ukrainian writer, Ivan Franko. This letter, which was published in the journal “Literaturno-Naukowy Wisnyk” in 1901, is a very important document of the epoch, bearing the mark of a literary manifesto. This little note made the Ukrainian intelligentsia aware of the crisis of so-called narodnytstvo poetics and the need for far-reaching modernization of Ukrainian literature. The writer postulated the rejection of adopted schemes in favour of the latest European trends in literature. The attempt to implement the program demands was an edition of Mykola Voronyi’s literary collection, “From the Valleys and Above the Clouds”, which has also been analyzed and discussed in this paper. The author concludes that the “Open letter to Ukrainian writers” can be considered one of the first manifestations of Ukrainian modernism

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Albert Nowacki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Electronic System «Archival Card Index» (АСI) represents the digital format of lexical and illustrative materials of the Commission of the Dictionary Living Ukrainian language (All-Ukrainian Academy of Sciences), which created the «Russian-Ukrainian Dictionary» by ed. A. Krymsky and S. Yefremov, today recognized as the superlative of Ukrainian lexicography of the 20-30’s of the 20th century, and which is becoming even more relevant today. The value of the АСI consists in the fact that it contains materials IV volume of the «Russian-Ukrainian Dictionary» destroyed in 1933. For the first time since the 1930’s ACI became the object of scientific attention precisely as materials of the repressed Commission, for more than half a century they were considered lost. ACI digital format is needed in order to prevent its physical decay, to return to the linguistic-cultural process, to optimize research work. After all, ACI contains professionally processed linguistic sources of general dictionaries first half XXth century, which are of great value for the restoration of the authenticity of Ukrainian language thinking, to eliminate the prolonged russification of Ukrainian vocabulary and the creation of dictionaries of the Ukrainian language of the 21th century.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Оксана М. Тищенко
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article applies the concept of anchoring, defined as the process of searching for footholds and points of reference which allows individuals to acquire socio-psychological stability and security and function effectively in a new environment, to explore complex, multidimensional and flexible adaptation and settlement processes among migrants from Ukraine in Poland. Based on 40 in-depth interviews and questionnaires with migrants resident in Warsaw and its vicinity, we argue that the traditional catego-ries employed for analysing migrants’ adaptation and settlement such as ‘integration’ or ‘assimilation’ are not always adequate to capture the way of functioning and experience of contemporary Ukrainian migrants. Rather than traditional categories, we propose to apply the concept of anchoring which ena-bles us to capture Ukrainians’ ‘fluid’ migration, drifting lives and complex identities as well as mecha-nisms of settling down in terms of searching for relative stability rather than putting down roots. The paper discusses the ambiguous position of Ukrainian migrants in Poland constructed as neither-strangers nor the same, gives insight into their drifting lives and illuminates ways of coping with tem-porariness and establishing anchors to provide a sense of stability and security. This approach, linking identity, security and incorporation, emphasises, on the one hand, the psychological and emotional as-pects of establishing new footholds and, on the other hand, tangible anchors and structural constraints. Its added value lies in the fact that it allows for the complexity, simultaneity and changeability of an-choring and the reverse processes of un-anchoring to be included.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska
Anita Brzozowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Ukraine has been going through a series of political and economic crises, notably the Euromaidan revolution and the Russian aggression and subsequent economic downturn. These events triggered fresh transnational diaspora-led activities such as the ‘London Euromaidan’ and the ‘Warsaw Euromaidan’. This paper analyses Ukrainian diaspora volunteerism in the UK and Poland and explores how the Ukrainian diaspora engages and contributes economically, socially, politically and culturally to the development of Ukraine. Drawing on fieldwork in both countries, three main findings were identified. First, due to the events in Ukraine, the Ukrainian diaspora has mobilised, grown stronger and became more united, whilst transforming from a more inward-looking to a more outward-looking community which, as a result, is now more and critically engaging with Ukrainian affairs. Second, the Ukrainian diaspora has the willingness, power and resources to contribute to the development of the home country, claiming to be recognised as an important stakeholder in the development of Ukraine. Thirdly, the Ukrainian government’s lack of recognition of the contribution of the Ukrainian diaspora is one of the most significant barriers to more comprehensive diaspora involvement in development.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iryna Lapshyna
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A review of Walentyna Sobol’s edition of a part of the Diary of Pylyp Orlyk, covering the years 1725–1726. The publication of the work of one of the champions of Ukrainian statehood, written in exile, takes on a symbolic dimension as it coincides with Ukraine’s struggle against Moscow’s aggression.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Myrosław Trofymuk
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Katedra Prasy Ukraińskiej, Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Lwowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Iwana Franki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes the phonetic system of the Bulaeshty dialect of the Ukrainian language as used in the village of Bulaeshty in the Republic of Moldova. This had been established until the 15th century by the natives of Bukovyna in the Ukraine. A system of contemporary sound derivatives from a Proto-Slavic ancient phonetic system of consonants has been identified. The full or partial conservation of archaic phonetic forms has become fixed. The Bulaeshty dialect retains a number of relict forms, including phonetic archaisms which have long been lost in the Ukrainian literary language and are increasingly fixed in modern Ukrainian dialects. An record of consonant phonemes in the dialect has been compiled. There are 38 phonemes and according to the differential basis of the “place of creation” of the sound manifestations, traditionally they are classified into groups: 1) labials (/б/, /п/, /в/, /м/, /ф/); 2) front tongue (/д/, /д’/, /т/, /т’/, /з/, /з’/, /с/, /с’/, /ц/, /ц’/, /л/, /л’/, /н/, /н’/, /дз/, /дз’/, /р/, /р’/, /дж’/, /ɕ/, /ч/, /ч’/, /ж/, /ш/); 3) medium tongue (/й/); 4) back tongue /(ґ/, /ґ’/, /к/, /к’/, /х/, /х’/); 5) pharyngeal (/г/, /г’/). Тheir functional load and conditions of positional and combinatorial variation have been determined.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Інна Гороф’янюк
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article dwells upon paraphrase in which proper names function as both the object of nomination and the component in the model of its creation. The device is analysed as it occurs in the language of modern Ukrainian publicist discourse. Firstly, the topicality of the research consists in the fact that mass media encourage the expansion of the lexical stock of a language by establishing new language trends. Secondly, publicist discourse is considered to be particularly exposed to the use of paraphrase, and so it is worth studying the peculiarities of the way paraphrases function in mass media. The given article aims to show how proper names may act in the process of modelling paraphrase, where a proper noun can serve two functions: as an object of paraphrase and as a component of its modelling. The article revisits the materials from M. Stepanenko’s book Politychne s’ogodennja ukrai’ns’koi’ movy: aktual’nyj peryfrastykon: monografija (Current state of Ukrainian political discourse: paraphrase of today). The materials are supplemented with examples collected by the author of the article from recent online publications of Ukrainian press. The use of proper names as objects of paraphrase or elements of its structure testifies to their exceptional ability to model pragmatic meaning. Pragmatic information reflected in paraphrase draws attention to the most essential qualities of a subject, a phenomenon or a person – those most important qualities that help understand a specific situation, phenomenon, behaviour, etc. An effective way of modelling paraphrase is to use a precedent. Derivatives whose bases are precedent units better reflect the peculiarities of a given culture, the way of thinking and every nation’s perception of reality, the system of its worldview and value orientations. The creation of paraphrase with proper names as their constituents encourages the fulfilment of a range of functions, in particular nominative, decorative, euphemist, impressive, compressive, attractional and axiological ones. The analysis of the materials leads to the conclusion that the majority of proper names-driven paraphrase is primarily essential for a given text. However, as some of them may enter everyday vocabulary, the author of the article emphasises the need to constantly trace the paraphrase phenomena and their systematic lexicographic realisation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dominika Janczura
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study follows a postcolonial approach towards Polish and Ruthenian national master narratives in Habsburg Galicia by assuming that Galician historians placed past Polish-Ruthenian relations in a colonial setting and emphasized Ruthenian subalternity. The investigation focuses on one of the most controversial issues in Polish-Ruthenian historiography: the era of Casimir the Great and the incorporation of Red Ruthenia into the Polish Kingdom in the 14th century. The central question is how Galician historians depicted this period in their works and to what extent they interpreted it as the beginning of a hegemonic relationship between Poles and Ruthenians. Which discursive strategies were utilized either to justify a Polish civilizing mission in Red Ruthenia or to refute the necessity of Polish colonial rule in this region?

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Burkhard Wöller
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

On the example of selected works by Oksana Zabuzhko, Volodymyr Lys, and Vasyl Shklar, I discuss the narrations of memory and ways of writing about history in Ukrainian contemporary prose. Historical topics concerning the traumatic experiences of the twentieth century appear in Ukrainian prose along with the regaining of independence and develop after 2000. The authors refer primarily to those issues which in the Soviet era were silenced, erased, censored. An important place in literary narratives of memory is occupied by the threads of OUN-UPA fi ghts, the Ukrainian-Bolshevik war, UNR times, Soviet terror, Great Hunger, the demythologization of World War II is also important, as well as an uncensored description of post-war Soviet reality. In the text, I do not carry out a detailed analysis of selected novels, but only highlight the main problems and ways in which authors write about history.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Zambrzycka
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Vasyl Stus is the Ukrainian existential poet, who used aesthetic of surrealism and expressionism. This text presents surreal elements in the Vasyl Stus’s poems which are connected with the idea of hell. Author gives examples of different images of hell in European culture and literature and also analyzes the surrealist poems of Vasyl Stus from his book Merry Cemetery.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mateusz Mościszko
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In February 2022, Russian troops invaded Ukraine, continuing a war that lasted since 2014. This turn of events led to massive migration of Ukrainian refugees to Poland, during which the country received approx. 2 million new inhabitants. The rapid migrational process led to attitudinal changes in the host country's population. This article reviews survey studies conducted at the Center for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw (cross-sectional and longitudinal) assessing the attitudes of Poles toward Ukrainians. According to our data, the attitudes of Poles toward Ukraine improved after the 2022 Russian invasion (compared to 2021), and our longitudinal studies confirmed that this change was relatively long-lasting – the attitudes did not deteriorate substantially. A study looking at attitudes toward war refugees from Ukraine and refugees from other countries found that Poles showed significantly higher acceptance of Ukrainian refugees than those from other countries, which could be largely attributed to greater contact with Ukrainians. Furthermore, Poles expressed relatively high acceptance of state support for healthcare and education of Ukrainian refugees, whereas the acceptance of direct financial support and housing was relatively lower.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Babińska
1
Michał Bilewicz
1
Paulina Górska
1
Sabina Toruńczyk-Ruiz
1
Michał Wypych
1

  1. Wydział Psychologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Large exposure near the brick-field in Halie represents one of the most complete loess sequences in the Ukrainian Carpathian F orcland, which i I lustrates a progress of events covering a considerable part of the Middle Pleistocene and the whole Upper Pleistocene. The most important of these arc: the Luck soil corresponding to the soil from the Zbójno lnicrglacial in Polish profiles and Dornnitz Interglacial (1~0 stage 9) in West European profiles, bottom part of the Upper Pleistocene (Dnieper= Odranian = Saalian I) loesses, which arc extremely thick and stratigraphically divided into units of lower rank. and well developed soil complexes - Korshov and Horok hov. Investigations of the Korshov soil arc a basis to discuss at least two stages/phases ofpedogcncsis development during the last but one interglacial (Lublinian = Trcenian: 1~0 stage 7). The Horokhov paleosol is connected with the Ecmian Interglacial. The Dubno and Rovno soils occur within the poorly developed Vistulian loesses: the Rovno soil is a cultural layer.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andriy Bogutskiy
Maria Łanczont
Roman Racinowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The borrowed lexis from the Polish language contained in the Russian-Ukrainian dictionaries of the early twentieth century is analyzed in the article. Its state and prevalence in the modern Ukrainian language is being clarified. Polonisms that are now out of use or on the periphery of the Ukrainian literary language have been investigated. Examples of actualized words were considered.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Людмила Томіленко

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more