Title

Theoretical framework for the RUNO personality typology based on the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2021

Volume

vol. 52

Issue

No 3

Authors

Strus, Włodzimierz ; Cybis, Natalia ; Cieciuch, Jan ; Rowiński, Tomasz

Affiliation

Strus, Włodzimierz : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Cybis, Natalia : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Cieciuch, Jan : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw ; Rowiński, Tomasz : Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw

Keywords

personality types ; Big Five ; RUO typology ; Two Factor Model ; Circumplex of Personality Metatraits ; RUNO typology

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

197-210

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliography

Alessandri, G., & Vecchione, M. (2017). Resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types across cultures. In A. T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures: Culture and characteristic adaptations (pp. 211-246). Santa Barbara, CA, US: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara, G. V., & Cieciuch, J. (2013). On the Cross-Cultural Replicability of the Resilient, Undercontrolled, and Overcontrolled Personality Types: Replicability of the RUO Types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12065
Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among big five ratings: The Halo- Alpha-Beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017159
Asendorpf, J. B. (2002). Editorial: The Puzzle of Personality Types. European Journal of Personality, 16, S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.446
Asendorpf, J. B. (2006). Typeness of personality profiles: A continuous person-centred approach to personality data. European Journal of Personality, 20, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.575
Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15(3), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.408
Avdeyeva, T. V., & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural general-izability of personality types: a Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19(6), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.555
Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, S43–S55. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.449
Becker, P. (1998). Special feature: A multifacet circumplex model of personality as a basis for the description and therapy of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12(3), 213-225. https:// doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1998.12.3.213
Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences,26, 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00168-8
Berry, J. W., Elliott, T. R., & Rivera, P. (2007). Resilient, Under-controlled, and Overcontrolled Personality Prototypes Among Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701629813
Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Book. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117
Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003596626
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego- resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect and social relations: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-101).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B., & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, S25–S41. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.450
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The “big five questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 281– 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th ed. N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.
Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Amell, J. W., Theodore, R. F., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Children’s behavioral styles at age 3 are linked to their adult personality traits at age 26. Journal of Personality, 71, 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7104001
Chang, L., Connelly, B.S., & Geeza, A. A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta-analytic multitrait–multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025559
Cieciuch, J., & Strus, W. (2017). Two-Factor Model of Personality. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2129-1
Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), S73–S87. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.448
Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Re-sources.
De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuven, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, S57–S72. https://doi. org/10.1002/per.444
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (2002). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 1-26). Seattle – Toronto – Bern – Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184
DeYoung, C. G. (2005). Cognitive ability and externalizing behavior in a psychobiological personality framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto. DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi- informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., Seguin, J. R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Externalizing behavior and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013742.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
Donnellan, M.B. & Robins, R.W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Person-ality and Social Psychology Compass, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x
Donnellan, M. B., Frederick, L., Oswald, B. M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable- and a person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality, 17(6), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.494
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press. Freudenstein, J.-P., Strauch, C., Mussel, P. & Ziegler, M. (2019). Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1045–1046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0721-4
Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2018). A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0419-z
Gerlitz J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Dokumentation der Instrumen-tenentwicklung BFI-S auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2005. DIW Research, Notes 4.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Gramzow, R. H., Sedikides, C., Panter, A. T., Sathy, V., Harris, J., & Insko, C. A. (2004). Patterns of self-regulation and the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 18(5), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.513
Grumm, M., von Collani. G. (2009). Personality types and self-reported aggressiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.001
Herzberg, P. Y., & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? an extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.557
Hofstee, W. K. B. (2002). Types and variables: Towards a congenial procedure for handling personality data. European Journal of Personality, 16, S89–S96. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.447
Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146.
Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self- Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical development, long-itudinal stability and predictive ability. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2054
Isler, L., Garth, J. O., Fletcher, G. J. O. Liu, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Validation of the four-profile configuration of personality types within the Five-Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.058
John, O., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102– 138).
Guilford Press. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: development of the IPIP- NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x
Leikas, S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Personality types during transition to young adulthood: How are they related to life situation and well- being? Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 753–762. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.003
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The Five-Factor Model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
McCrae, R. R. (2009). The physics and chemistry of personality. Theory & Psychology, 19, 670 – 687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309341928
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
McCrae, R. R., Jang, K. L., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Yamagata, S., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.442
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Ozer, D. J. (2006). Person-factors in the California Adult Q-Set: Closing the door on personality trait types? European Journal of Personality, 20, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.553
Meeus, W., Van de Schoot, R., Klimstra, T., & Branje, S. (2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1181–1195 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023816.
Mervielde, I., & Asendorpf, J. (2000). Variable-centered and person- centered approaches to childhood personality. In S. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–76). London: Routledge.
Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022
Musek, J. (2007). A General Factor of Personality: Evidence of the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
Rammstedt, B., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Borkenau, P. (2004). Resilients, Overcontrollers, and Undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.495
Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer- Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157
Rushton, J. P., & Irving, P. (2011). The General Factor of Personality: normal and abnormal. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 134-163). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sava, F. A., & Popa, R. I. (2011). Personality types based on the big five model. A cluster analysis over the Romanian population. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 359–384.
Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO-PI-R versus NEO-FFI. European Journal of Personality, 16, S7–S24. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.445
Simsek, Ö. F., Koydemir, S., & Schütz, A. (2012). A multigroup multitrait- multimethod study in two countries supports the validity of a two- factor higher order model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.005
Solís-Cámara R., P., Meda Lara, R.M., Moreno Jiménez, B., Palomera Chávez, A. & Juárez Rodríguez, P. (2017). Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México [Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico]. Acta colombiana de Psicología, 20(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
Specht, J., Luhmann, M., & Geiser, C. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036863
Steca, P., Alessandri, G., & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well- known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 442–446. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.016
Strelau, J. (2002). Psychologia różnic indywidualnych [The psychology of individual differences]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2017). Towards a synthesis of person-ality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health mod-els within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.002.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2019). Are the questionnaire and the psycho- lexical Big Twos the same? Towards an integration of personality structure within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Interna-tional Journal of Personality Psychology, 5, 18-35. https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.5.35594
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017
Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56– 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002
Zawadzki, B. (2016). Gamma i Delta w ujęciu Kołowego Modelu Metacech a przekonania w zaburzeniach osobowości [Gamma and Delta in the perspective of the Circumplex of Personality Metratraits and beliefs in personality disorders]. In A. Rynkiewicz, K. Jan-kowski, & W. Oniszczenko (Eds.), Wybrane metody i paradygmaty badawcze w psychologii [Selected research methods and paradigms in psychology] (pp. 203–220). Warsaw, PL: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Zawadzki, B. (2017). The location of personality disorders in the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Annals of Psychology, 20(2), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2017.20.2-7en
Zawadzki, B., & Strelau, J. (2003a). Identyfikacja trzech podstawo-wych prototypów osobowości w grupach polskich: Próba reorien-tacji badań nad osobowością z koncepcji cech w koncepcję typów? [The identification of three basic personality prototypes: The attempt to reorientation of personality research from concept of traits to concept of types?]. Studia Psychologiczne, 41(4), 217– 242.
Zawadzki, B., & Strelau, J. (2003b). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu? [Three basic types or four struc-tures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271 –285.

Date

2021.10.06

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.137885

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO