Title

Psychological processes of perceiving implied motion in static images

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2021

Volume

vol. 52

Issue

No 4

Authors

Khatin-Zadeh, Omid

Affiliation

Khatin-Zadeh, Omid : School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Keywords

Static images ; Implied motion ; motion events ; The motor system

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

334-340

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliography

Babcock, M. K., & Freyd, J. J. (1988). Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 111–130.
Carlile, S., & Leung, J. (2016). The perception of auditory motion. Trends in Hearing, 20(1), 1-19.
Cattaneo, Z., Schiavi, S., Silvanto, J., & Nadal M. (2017). A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1), 59- 68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1083968.
Chen, I. H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C. R. (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLoS ONE,14, e0211336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211336
Filipović Đurđević, D. F., Popović Stijačić, M., & Karapandžić, J. (2016). A quest for sources of perceptual richness: Several candidates. In S Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martínez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in language and mind (pp. 187–238). Novi Sad, Serbia: Filozofski fakultet uNovom Sadu.
Freyd, J. J. (1983a). Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory & Cognition, 11(4), 342-346.
Freyd, J. J. (1983b). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(6), 575- 581.
Futterweit, L. R., & Beilin, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57(2), 163-179.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuro-psychology, 22(3), 455-479.
Getzmann, S., & Lewald, J. (2009). Constancy of target velocity as a critical factor in the emergence of auditory and visual representa-tional momentum. Experimental Brain Research, 193(3), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1641-0
James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2006). Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory‐motor brain network. Neuropsychologia, 44(14), 2937– 2949.
Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 822-851.
Hubbard, T. L. (2018). Influences on representational momentum. In T. L. Hubbard (Ed.). Spatial Biases in Perception and Cogni-tion (pp. 121-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hubbard, T. L. (2019). Momentum-like effects and the dynamics of perception, cognition, and action. Attention, Perception, & Psycho-physics, 81(3), 2155–2170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01770-z
Kim, C. Y., & Blake, R. (2007). Seeing what you understand: Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings. Spatial Vision, 20(6), 545–560.
Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 48–55.
Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the 12th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (p. 455– 471). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leyton, M. (1989). Inferring causal history from shape. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 357-387.
Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1492– 1500.
Longcamp, M., Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2011). What differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 32(8), 1250-1259.
Lorteije, J. A., Barraclough, N. E., Jellema, T., Raemaekers, M., Duijnhouwer, J., Xiao, D., et al. (2010). Implied motion activation in cortical area MT can be explained by visual low-level features. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1533-1548.
Lorteije, J. A., Kenemans, J. L., Jellema, T., van der Lubbe, R. H., de Heer, F., & van Wezel, R. J. (2006). Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2),158–168.
Lorteije, J. A., Kenemans, J. L., Jellema, T., van der Lubbe, R. H., Lommers, M. W., & vanWezel, R. J. (2007). Adaptation to real motion reveals direction-selective interactions between real and implied motion processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1231–1240.
Matlock, T. (2004). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & R. Dirven (eds.), Motivation in Grammar, 221–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243–260.
Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226.
Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: Modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, image-ability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 641–661.
Mishra, R. (2009). Interaction of language and visual attention: Evidence from production and comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 176, 277–292.
Osaka, N., Matsuyoshia, D., Ikeda, T., & Osaka, M. (2010). Implied motion because of instability in Hokusai Manga activates the human motion-sensitive extrastriate visual cortex: An fMRI study of the impact of visual art. NeuroReport, 21(4), 264–267.
Pavan, A., Cuturi, L. F., Maniglia, M., Casco, C., & Campana, G. (2011). Implied motion from static photographs influences the perceived position of stationary objects. Vision Research, 51(1), 187-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.004.
Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2003). Fictive motion in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 123–150.
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2480–2490.
Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., Berchio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Umiltà, M. A. (2013). ERP modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. PLoS One. 8(10):e75241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0075241.
Senior, C., Barnes, J., Giampietro, V., Simmons, A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit- motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology, 10(1), 16–22.
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods,49, 2204–2218.
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space, 211–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thakral, P. P., Moo, L. R., & Slotnick, S. D. (2012). A neural mechanism for aesthetic experience. Neuroreport, 23(5), 310-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351759f.
Umilta', M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2012). Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311
Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Østergaard, S., Østergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. NeuroReport, 16(6), 649-652.
Williams, A. L., & Wright, M. J. (2010). Static representations of speed and their neural correlates in human area MT/V5. NeuroReport, 20(16), 1466–1470.
Winawer, J., Huk, A. C., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychological Science, 19 (3), 276–283.
Zhao, X., Wang, J., Li, J., Luo, G., Li, T., Chatterjee, A., Zhang, W., & He, X. (2020). The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 20774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77658-y

Date

2022.01.03

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.139167

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO