Humanities and Social Sciences

Slavia Orientalis

Content

Slavia Orientalis | 2023 | vol. LXXII | No 2

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is an attempt to outline a model of spiritual iconography. The main purpose of the article is to justify the thesis that this model appears to be formulated in the statements of a Moscow icon painter: A. Sokolov (died 2015). Initially, we assume that an icon has four main aspects: ecclesiastical (related to worship), theological, spiritual, and artistic, which closely relate to each other and determine its essence – iconicity. According to them, we can distinguish four models of iconography: each contains the whole iconicity, but each of them is dominated by a different dimension of it. On this basis, we assume the existence of a model built on the dominance of the spiritual element – a model that interprets iconography as spirituality. In order to show that this model is implemented by iconography as interpreted by Sokolow, we show that it has the structural features of spirituality. To this end, we refer to contemporary interpretations of ancient philosophy, which see it as spirituality (P. Hadot, M. Foucault); from them we draw the structural features of spirituality and indicate them in Sokolov’s formulations on iconography.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Lidia Macheta
1

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the Polish translation of the first poem from the series of six poems Звезда Маир (1898) by Fiodor Sologub and here in the translation by Witold Dąbrowski, Gwiazda Mair. Our task is to analyze the translation and trace to what extent the translator reflected the specificity of the lyrical situation presented in the original, and to what extent its image in the translation has changed. In addition, the focus was on translating the author’s proper names, reflecting Sologub’s creation of paradise, in order to show how specific translation activities affect the recipient’s perception of the lyrical situation shown in the poem. The rhythmic organization of the poem and the arrangement of rhymes in the original and in translation were also examined. It was shown to what extent the translators managed to reflect the hidden meanings and meaning‐creating symbols, so important for this Russian symbolist.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Potyrańska
1

  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej, Lublin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The issue of unconsciousness, correlated with the topic of a human’s sexual life, is one of the most significant philosophical trends in Nikolai Berdyaev. Focusing on this issue, the Russian thinker perceives the ambiguous assessment of psychoanalysis as the groundbreaking phenomenon of his times. Berdyaev’s attitude towards Sigmund Freud’s and Carl G. Jung’s theories oscillates between approval and negation, and is shaped on the plane of ontological deconstruction. According to Berdyaev, psychoanalysis allows people to realize the presence of gender energy as well as indicates the need for sublimation. However, the transformation of sex drive into the source of production is not possible without the spiritual principle – something that is not taken into consideration in psychoanalysis, which is, as Berdyaev claims, its greatest weakness.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Izabella Malej
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wrocław, Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In 2022, the Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences published three texts by the Russian writer and anthroposophist Nikolai Belotsvetov: The Book of the Russian Grail, In Defense of Anthroposophy, and The Mystery of Good and Evil in the Spiritual Experience of Self‐Knowledge, that were found in private archives. This article undertakes a consideration of the story of the Russian Grail contained in Belotsvetov’s text of the same title. Semantic category of this multidimensional symbol, constructed by Belotsvetov, allows for an original and still relevant account of the Parsifal Road as a historical perspective of Russia.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Diana Oboleńska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Gdańsk, Uniwersytet Gdański
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes the works of two novelists from Sniatyn (Ivano‐Frankivsk) Vasyl Stefanyk and Vasyl Tkachuk for special (similar and distinctive) features in their national vision of the image of the land, which for Ukrainians as an ethnic group that has shaped its agrarian culture for centuries, remains the greatest value, holiness, a symbol of spiritual stability. Therefore, this image in Ukrainian culture is very deep, has archetypal features, because the land for the Ukrainian people was not only evidence of prosperity and wealth, but also a moral imperative and this is widely reflected in folklore and the cultural heritage of Ukrainians, including literature. In the Carpathian and Transcarpathian mountain regions, the peasant’s attitude to the land was aggravated by the fact that there were few small plots ‘won’ from the mountains and adapted for cultivation. That is why the life of peasants is marked by a special complexity during a long historical period and of social changes. So, the first emigration of Ukrainians began who since the end of the 18th century sought happiness in the fertile lands of the Canadian prairies. V. Stefanyk and V. Tkachuk grew up and formed as writers in one region, for both the life of the Carpathian peasants, which they portrayed with a deep psychology, became the main theme of their works. There are many parallels in their short stories, but the most complete for both artists is the image of the earth, which has become the subject of our comparative studies.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Жанна Янковська
1
ORCID: ORCID
Марина Набок
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Острог, Національний університет «Острозька академія»
  2. Суми, Сумський державний університет
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In contemporary cultural discourse, Chernobyl is associated with nuclear apocalypse. The author of the article examines two authors’ visions of Chernobyl in Ukrainian literature, which represent different textual strategies of the copreciprocalization of the trauma experienced. One of them, revealed in Markiyan Kamysh’s novel Oformlandia (2015), is an attempt to reconstruct a post‐apocalyptic world. The writer’s narrator, who is the same age as the Chernobyl disaster of 1986, travels to the Zone and talks about it as an exotic space that is freed from human presence. In Teodosia Zarivna’s novel The Silence of Caesium (2022) the narrator is a peasant woman who oppositely has spent her entire life near Chernobyl, but after the accident returns and becomes the last resident in her native village. The first work presents an imaginary model of the future: Chernobyl becomes a place of exotic excursions and extreme tourists. In the second, the Zone appears as an organic factor in a picture of the past – a historical era of the twentieth century, which is fading into oblivion along with its last witnesses.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jarosław Poliszczuk
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The novel I/e_rus.olim by Elizaveta Mikhailichenko and Yury Nesis – representatives of Russian- ‐language literature in Israel – is seen by the author of the article as a writing experiment. The work, representing the Liternet, fits into the paradigm – well‐established in Russian‐Israeli literature – of the new cultural realism, which implies the concept of reality treated as a reflection in literature of the network world concept. However, the pair of authors go further – they identify the world at the same time with the network, hypertext, rhizome, simulacra and hyperreality. All the structural and interpretive elements of the novel permeate and complement each other, resulting in a picture of a multidimensional cultural‐historical reality, with its symbols and memories of the past, a reality recognized and “decoded” by the protagonists – repatriates in the difficult process of building a national self‐awareness.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mirosława Michalska-Suchanek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to devise a conceptual paradigm for the semantic relations in the meaning of words in various Slavonic languages and in some of their dialects. The source material are the data contained in The Etymological Dictionary of the Slavonic Languages. The Pre‐Slavonic Lexical Source – 20<sup>th</sup> edition by O.N. Trubachov, Moscow: Nauka, 1994. These data are the starting point to present the two basic features in the form of the meaning dyad of the common root mьrz‐ > * morz‐. The first element of this dyad assumes the meaning of ‘cold, cool, frost’ as the outer conditions of its weather, nature character (the A feature) while the second element assumes the disgust, rejection as the relation (the B feature). Both these features and their mutual relations are described here with regard to the division of their levels and sublevels of meaning as well as with regard to the various shades of these meanings in creating a system. This system is the base of the nomination correlation presented in the paper. Gradually the signs arise, and they take part in the creation of the projections mentioned in the paper’s title. These signs refer to subject, object, object‐person, object‐thing, space, action, feature‐properties (attributive), features‐quality (characteristics) observed outside and felt inside.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Czerwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article illustrates the destructive influence of language policy in the era of totalitarianism on the grammatical system of the Ukrainian literary language on the example of the endings of the genitive case of singular nouns in the 3rd declension. According to the “Ukrainian orthography” of various years of publication, we can trace the norm of using the endings of the genitive case of singular nouns of the 3rd declension over the past 100 years. The elimination of the ending ‐u from the grammatical system of word change of nouns of the 3rd declension in 1933 was recorded. This gives reasons to qualify this ending as repression. Founding on the historically determined regularities of the development of the grammatical system of the Ukrainian language, the need to return the ending ‐u to the edition of “Ukrainian orthography” in 2019 was justified. It was established that despite the democratization of society, the tendency towards the revival of national identity, the desire of Ukrainian‐oriented speakers to establish and return the specific foundations of Ukrainian literary languages, the re‐codification of the ending ‐и in the 21st century could not restore its active use in language practice. Based on the results of a questionnaire, we found out the main reasons for the non‐observance of the returned morphological norm by modern speakers. We concluded as to the disastrous consequences of the grammatical heritage formed in the Soviet period on the language practice of the third millennium. Ways to improve this situation are proposed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Лариса Колібаба
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Київ, Інститут української мови НАН України
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article focused on the place of feminized job/activity titles in the modern Ukrainian language, their perception and use. In particular, it contains analysis of lexicographical works which show the gradual increase in the number of such language units during the 20th – early 21st century within Ukrainian. This process has happened against the background of increased educational and professional opportunities for women. During that time feminized job/ activity titles have become so regular in the speech practice of Ukrainians that eventually they were introduced in dictionaries. However, for a long time these language units remained stylistically marked as ‘colloquial’ or ‘vernacular’. Scrolling through social networks shows that even today they are sometimes perceived as mocking or contemptuous words. The results of a poll illustrate that speakers associate them with feminist movements or political factors, but mostly recognize feminized job/activity titles as a manifestation of the synchronization of social and linguistic processes. Today, the main issues regarding feminized job/activity titles in Ukrainian are their further standardization and the possibility of neutralizing any stylistic colouring.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Юлія Макарець
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Національний педагогічний університет імені М.П. Драгоманова (Київ)
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to reproduce and compare the peculiarities of the ethnocultural image of a vain person, as verbalized in Ukrainian and Polish phraseology. The subject of analysis is the structural‐semantic and functional peculiarities of Ukrainian and Polish phraseological units, in which vanity is conceptualized as an emotional state of superiority, arrogance, pride, and which have a pronounced negative connotation. The study found that in the common Ukrainian‐Polish perception, a vain person is a person who considers himself/herself superior to others, and, accordingly, others negatively evaluate this position. Most often, vanity in Polish and Ukrainian phraseology is conceptualized through the image of a person with their head raised high, puffed up, with protruding lips, whose appearance and habits resemble the behaviour of a beautiful pompous bird: a peacock or a rooster (in Ukrainian and Polish ethnoculture), a crane or a turkey (only in Polish), goldeneye or a screech‐owl (only in Ukrainian). Also common is the idea of a vain person who thinks he/she is the smartest, while others think that something is wrong with him/her. Comparing the analyzed phraseological units in the selected languages allows us to better understand the peculiarities of the image, which became the impetus for the creation of the phraseological nomination, to establish the regularities and mechanisms of the verbal explication of vanity in Ukrainian and Polish linguistic cultures.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Оксана Лозинська
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Львів, Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article focuses on the problem of rituality in contemporary political discourse. It describes the specificity of manifestations of rituality in political discourse on the example of the Russian variant. The material for research is served by the official public texts of utterances made by V.V. Zhirinovsky published in the party newspapers of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia in year 2021. The study was carried out using discourse analysis. In the theoretical part definitions of ambiguous terms are given, which undoubtedly include discourse, political discourse, and ritual. Their accepted definitions and concepts are indicated. Observations are made on the linguistic forms of ritual expression in politics, which are mainly associated with the performance of a specific political function. It has been proven that rituality in political discourse is opposed to informativeness and manifested in the fulfilment of the assigned specific political role and tasks in society.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriela Dudek-Waligóra
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Kraków, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Authors and Affiliations

Feliks Czyżewski
1

  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‐Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Instructions for authors

Rules for getting published in the Slavia Orientalis

I. The Slavia Orientalis quarterly accepts manuscripts that have not been published previously. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, ghostwriting and guest authorship will be treated as an act of research misconduct. Editorial Board will document all forms of ethical violations and scientific misconduct and shall notify appropriate institutions about them.

The manuscript sent to the Editorial Board should be accompanied by the following statement of originality:

“I declare that the article ………………… (Title) submitted for publication in the Slavia Orientalis quarterly has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Date ………………… Signature ………………………….”

There is no peer review fee and no publication fee. Once the paper is published, the authors will be receiving a free print copy of the journal’s issue containing their article.

II. Slavia Orientalis publishes articles in Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Polish and English.

III. Please attach to the text Polish, English, Russian version of the title, English summary (up to 0,5 page), five English key words, a signed statement of originality, short information about the author, containing the following data: name and surname, title or academic degree, place of employment (including address) and position, correspondence address, e-mail, titles of the most important publications (books and articles), with an indication of the year and place of publication (5 items).

IV. In addition to the articles the Editorial Board also publishes:
a) Substantive, evaluative and polemical reviews (up to 5 typescript pages);
b) Information on books (up to 2 typescript pages);
c) Session or scientific conference reports (up to 3 typescript pages).

V. Technical requirements:
a) electronic text (in rtf and pdf format) should be sent to: slavia-orientalis@uj.edu.pl;
b) texts in English should begin with a brief (about a half page in length) summary either in Russian or Polish;
c) texts in Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian should begin with a brief (about a half page in length) summary in English;
d) in Polish and English texts, please provide quotations and footnotes in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian in the original (not in transliteration);
e) titles of works appearing in the Polish text for the first time should be given in parentheses in the original version (not in transliteration);
f) typescript should have appropriate spacing and margin on the left side;
g) font style: Times New Roman (CE or CYR), font size: 12 points, spacing: 1.5;
h) a standard page contains 30 lines with approximately 60 characters per line (1,800 characters per page with spaces);
i) articles should not exceed the prescribed character limit (40,000 characters with spaces);
j) footnotes should be listed at the bottom of the page (numbered continuously) by “Insert footnote” option;
k) articles should be provided with a reference list. Bibliography, for all languages that use Cyryllic script, should be transliterated into the Latin script according to the BGN/PCGN system (US Board on Geographic Names / Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use). Transliteration can be done online, e.g. in the Transliteration program https://www.translitteration.com by selecting the appropriate language option (Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian).
l) When listing bibliography, please follow the samples presented below:

Book:
J. Kowalski, Historia literatury, Kraków 1990, s. 23.
Ibidem, s. 13.
J. Kowalski, Historia..., s. 56.


Book excerpt:
A. Nowak, Z dziejów piśmiennictwa, [w:] Historia cywilizacji, Warszawa 1987, s. 98.
Ibidem, s.13.
A. Nowak, Z dziejów..., s. 135.


Journal article:
L. Nowacka, Teoria aktów mowy, „Przegląd Językoznawczy” 1963, nr 7, s. 45.

Internet sources:
I. Yazykova, Obraz Bogurodzicy w ruskiej ikonografii, [w:] https://www.ortodox.ru (28.03.2011).

VI. Any substantive changes introduced by the Author after the manuscript has been set up for type will be made at the expense of the Atuthor.

VII. The Editorial Board does not return unsolicited manuscripts.

VIII. Text should be prepared according to the example provided below:

Name and Surname
City, address of Author’s institution



ORIGINAL TITLE

English title



ABSTRACT:
KEYWORDS:

Text of paper

References

Publication Ethics Policy


Publication ethics

The Slavia Orientalis quarterly adheres to the principles presented in the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The rules of conduct concern in particular:

I. Duties of Authors
1. Authors are obliged to diligently prepare the articles for publication in the Slavia Orientalis, in accordance with the rules in force.
2. By submitting the material for publication in the Slavia Orientalis quarterly, the Author warrants that the article is his/her original work, has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere, and that it does not infringe third-party intellectual property rights.
3. The Author assumes responsibility for the credibility and proper documentation of the information provided in the article.
4. Authors are obliged to take the comments from the Reviewers into account or to justify their refusal in writing.
5. After the article is accepted for publication, the Author signs a publication agreement with the Editorial Board under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND free access license.

II. Rules of the Editorial Board
1. The Slavia Orientalis quarterly accepts manuscripts that have not been published previously. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, ghostwriting and guest authorship will be treated as an act of research misconduct. Editorial Board will document all forms of ethical violations and scientific misconduct and shall notify appropriate institutions about them. In the event of a confirmed scientific misconduct, disclosed after the publication of the text, the Editorial Board will provide relevant information.
2. Only high scientific value of the work, its reliability and linguistic correctness will be taken into account when reviewing and qualifying texts for publication. The Editorial Board shall respect the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest.
3. Editorial Board may refuse to publish the manuscript if it does not agree with the Author’s reaction to the reviews.
4. The correspondence between members of the Editorial Board, members of the Scientific Council and Authors or Reviewers shall be treated as confidential.

III. Duties and responsibilities of the Scientific Council
1. Advising the Editorial Board on issues related to the scientific level of the quarterly.
2. Paying attention to observed cases of scientific dishonesty.
3. Proposing new research issues, e.g. Eastern Slavonic languages, to include in the journal’s future publishing projects.
4. Providing opinion on ideas proposed by the Editorial Board for publication in special issues.
5. Concern for the recognition and scientific prestige of the quarterly in the international scientific community.

IV. Duties of Reviewers
1. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.
2. Reviews should contain an explicit recommendation whether to accept or reject the paper for publication.
3. The Reviewer is obliged to notify the Editorial Board about any case of plagiarism in the reviewed text.

Peer-review Procedure


Procedure for reviewing scientific articles in the quarterly Slavia Orientalis

1. Submitted material is initially evaluated by the Editorial Board in terms of meeting all formal requirements and its compliance with the journal’s scientific and thematic profile.

2. Reviews are prepared on the peer review form.

3. In the process of reviewing the following rules are followed:
a) the principle of two independent reviews;
b) the principle of selecting reviewers on the basis of their expertise;
c) the principle of avoiding the conflict of interest in the selection of reviewers;
d) the principle of double blind peer review;
e) the principle of appointing a third reviewer in the event of contradictory reviews.

4. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.

Download Peer review form of the article


Reviewers

Recenzenci (2020-2021)

Augustyn, Leszek, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Banaszkiewicz, Magdalena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Bartmiński, Jerzy, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Bacewicz, Florij, prof. dr hab., Lwowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Iwana Franko

Bahdanowicz Iryna, prof. dr, Białoruski Uniwersytet Państwowy, Mińsk

Barszt, Konstantin, prof. dr hab., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej RAN (Dom Puszkinowski), (Sankt Petersburg)

Bednarczyk, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Beley, Oleh, dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Betko, Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

Bobilewicz Grażyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Bohun, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Cierniak, Urszula, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie

Coghen, Monika, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Charciarek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Czerwiński Grzegorz, dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Czerwiński, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Dobieszewski, Janusz, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Drozdowski, Mariusz, dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Duć-Fajfer, Helena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Dudek-Szumigaj, Agnieszka, dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Fałowski, Adam, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Flis-Czerniak, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Fontański, Henryk, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Gadomski, Aleksander, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Opolski

Ginter, Anna, dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Głuszkowski, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Grabowicz George, prof. dr, Uniwersytet Harvarda (Cambridge, MA)

Grzybowski, Stefan, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Habrajska, Grażyna, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Horniatko-Szumiłowicz, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Juda, Celina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Jusupović, Adrian - dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Historii PAN (Warszawa)

Kaleta Radosław, dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Kapuścik, Jerzy, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Kochanek, Piotr, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Kojder, Marcin, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Komendová, Jitka, doc. Mgr. Ph.D, Uniwersytet Palackiego w Ołomuńcu

Komisaruk Ewa, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Komorowska, Ewa, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Kodzis, Bronisław, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Kononenko Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Korniejenko, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Korzeniowski, Mariusz, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Kosmeda Tetiana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Kościelniak, Krzysztof, ks. prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Kotyńska Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Kowalow, Siergiej, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Kowalska-Paszt, Izabela, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Kozak, Stefan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Krasowska, Helena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Kuczyńska, Marzanna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Kuffel, Józef, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Leszczak, Oleg, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Leśniewski, Krzysztof, prof. dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Lewicki, Roman, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Lewkijewskaja, Jelena, prof. dr hab., Rosyjski Państwowy Uniwersytet Humanistyczny (Moskwa)

Lubocha-Kruglik, Jolanta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Madyar, Olha, Madyar, doc. Mgr. CSc., Uniwersytet Preszowski

Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Marszałek, Marek, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Masłowska, Ewa, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Matusiak, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Mianowska, Joanna, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Mironowicz, Antoni, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Moklak, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Moser, Michael, Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Dr. h. c. Prof. h. c., Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Moskwin, Andriej, dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Mucha Bogusław, em. prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Mytnik, Irena, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Ndyae, Iwona, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

Nefagina, Galina, prof. zw., dr hab., Akademia Pomorska w Słupsku

Nikołajew, Siergiej, prof., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej (Dom Puszkinowski) RAN, Sankt Petersburg

Nowak Alicja, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Oboleńska, Diana, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Ostrowski, Bogumił, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie

Pełczyński, Grzegorz, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Pliouchanowa, Marija, prof. dr, Uniwersytet w Peruggii

Poliszczuk, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Radyszews’kyi, Rostysław, prof. dr hab., Kijowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Tarasa Szewczenki

Rak, Maciej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Ranczin, Andriej, prof. dr hab., Moskiewski Uniwersytet Państwowy im. M. Łomonosowa

Rembiszewska, Dorota, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Romaniuk, Switłana, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Roszko, Roman, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Selart, Anti, prof. dr, Uniwersytet w Tartu

Siatkowski, Janusz, em. prof. zw. dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN, Warszawa

Sidor, Monika, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Simonek, Stefan, Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr., Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Siryk, Ludmiła, dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Skotnicka, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Sobol, Walentyna, prof. zw. dr hab. Uniwersytet Warszawski

Stach, Grażyna, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Stachowski, Marek, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Styczyński, Marek, em. prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Szczerbowski, Tadeusz, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie

Szmiher, Taras, doc. dr hab., Lwowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Iwana Franko

Tarkowska, Joanna, dr hab, prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Titarenko, Swietłana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet w Sankt Petersburgu

Tiupa, Walerij, prof. dr hab., Rosyjski Państwowy Uniwersytet Humanistyczny (Moskwa)

Toporkow, Andriej, prof. dr hab., Instytut Literatury Światowej im. M. Gorkiego RAN (Moskwa)

Trojanowska, Beata, dr hab. prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Trzeszczyńska Patrycja, dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Twaranowicz, Halina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Tyrpa, Anna, prof. dr hab., Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN (Kraków)

Tyszkowska-Kasprzak, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Weretiuk, Oksana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Rzeszowski

Wierzbiński, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Winogradowa, Ludmiła, dr hab., Instytut Słowianoznawstwa RAN (Moskwa)

Wojan, Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Woźniak, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Zeldowicz, Gennadij, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Żyłko, Bogusław, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Gdański





Recenzenci (2015-2019)

Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Bacewicz, Florij, prof., Uniwersytet Lwowski

Bednarczyk, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Betko, Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski

Bezwiński, Adam, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Charciarek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski

Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. zw., dr hab. UMCS w Lublinie

Diec, Joachim, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Dudek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Fałowski, Adam, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Fast, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski

Głuszkowski, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Gołębiowska-Suchorska, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Grzybowski, Stefan, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Kiklewicz, Aleksander, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski

Kowalska-Stus, Hanna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Korytkowska, Małgorzata, prof. zw., dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN

Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Kowalczyk, Witold, dr hab., prof. UMCS, Uniwersytet Marii Curie -Skłodowskiej

Ksenicz, Andrzej, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Łucewicz, Ludmiła, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Marszałek, Marek, dr hab. prof. uczelni Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Mikiciuk, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Mozer, Michael, prof., Instytut Slawistyki, Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Nikołajew, Siergiej, prof., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej (Dom Puszkinowski)

Orłowski, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Pluskota, Teresa, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Przebinda, Grzegorz, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Ranczin, Andriej, prof., Moskiewski Uniwersytet im. M. Łomonosowa

Raźny, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Stawarz, Barbara, dr hab., prof. UP, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie

Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Trojanowska, Beata, dr hab. Prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Waligórska-Olejniczak, Beata, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza

Wawrzyńczyk, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Wołodźko-Butkiewicz, Alicja, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Woźniak, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski


Recenzenci (2012-2014)


Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Bednarczyk, Anna, dr hab., prof. UŁ, Uniwersytet Łódzki
Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersyey Marii Curie-Skłodowskie
Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski
Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. dr hab. UMCS w Lublinie
Diec, Joachim, dr hab., prof. UJ, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Duda, Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. UJ, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Dudek, Andrzej, dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Fałowski, Adam, prof.dr hab. Uniwersyetet Jagielloński
Fast, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Wyższa Szkoła Lingwistyczna w Częstochowie
Kiklewicz, Aleksander, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski
Korytkowska, Małgorzata, prof. zw., dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. UMK, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
Kowalczyk, Witold, dr hab., prof. UMCS, Uniwersytet Marii Curie -Skłodowskiej
Kozak, Stefan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski
Łucewicz, Ludmiła, prof.zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Majmieskułow, Anna, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki
Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Mianowska, Joanna, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Mikiciuk, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. UG, Uniwersytet Gdański
Mozer, Michael, prof., Instytut Slawistyki, Uniwersytet w Wiedniu
Orłowski, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Pluskota, Teresa, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Ranczin, Andriej, prof., Moskiewski Uniwersytet im. M. Łomonosowa
Raźny, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Stawarz, Barbara, dr hab., prof. UP, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie
Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Wawrzyńczyk, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Wołodźko-Butkiewicz, Alicja, prof.zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

 

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more