Humanities and Social Sciences

Slavia Orientalis

Content

Slavia Orientalis | 2022 | vol. LXXI | No 4

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The works of Fyodor Sologub, unlike most Russian symbolists, such as Alexander Blok, are described by researchers and contemporary writers (Vladyslav Khodasevich and others) as ‘static’, alien to the idea of path, evolution. The aim of the article is to break this academic stereotype and thought patterns about the author of The Little Demon. Analysis of the research material: critical literary statements and selected poems by the poet, allows us to notice his spiritual and aesthetic evolution. Firstly: in fulfilling his artistic vision, Sologub not only does not “tread water” (“topchetsya na odnom meste”, as Leo Shestov stated), but, as Maria Cymborska‑Leboda writes, his poetic thought remains in motion, i.e. there are noticeable ‘points’ on his artistic way, to which he reaches. Thus, in the words of the mentioned researcher, in a certain sense, like Blok, he is a ‘path poet’, while remaining faithful to himself – his ‘sweet dream’ (paradise). Secondly: the interpretation of the symbol of the ‘path’ and related concepts that fit within the semantic field of the poet’s works point to the biblical sources of his thinking – the author’s lyrical subject often takes the form of a pilgrim, a wanderer traversing the ‘desert of life’, struggling with the world (мироборчество), he conducts a dialogue, often turning into a dispute with the Creator (богоборчество). This dialogue, subjected to reflection in the article, is interpreted as one of the manifestations of the spiritual growth of the lyrical hero and the poet himself (the vertical and existential dimension of the concept – homo viator).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ewa Stawinoga
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article reveals the peculiarities of the urban text in Isaac Babel’s Odessa Stories. The image of Odessa is analyzed as a poetological dominant of the cycle. The originality of the artistic image and the text of Odessa is considered as the relationship between the semantic setting in the social and cultural focus, the historical image of the city and its perception in the minds of townspeople. Thus, the author focuses on the space locus that serves as a marker of the Odessa text and identifies the city of Odessa (Moldavanka, Peresyp, Privoz), the images of the Odessa landscape in their symbolic interpretation and the image of Odessa man as closely related components of the artistic structure of the cycle and the Odessa text itself. Analysis of the stories distinguishes that the meaning‑forming and structure‑forming functions of the Odessa topoi are subordinated to a single goal – to create and typify the image of Odessa man. What is important is not the city itself as a socio‑cultural organism, but its perception in the urban consciousness. The key fact to reveal the specifics of the Odessa text and the Odessa consciousness is the idea of the decline – the collapse of the communal and tribal consciousness as the decline of the Odessa ethnos realized in the conflict of personal and social principles, the inverse comprehension of Rabelaisian corporality motif, the images of the sunset landscape and in the irony, which discredits as false both the gang life romance and the appearing concept of a new world. The city depicted by I. Babel on the threshold of the 1917 revolution is interpreted as a city at the decline of culture. The writer depicts the end or the decline of old Odessa through the end of Odessa man and the collapse of the Odessa ethnos. Thus, in I. Babel’s Odessa cycle, there is a transformation of the traditional image of sunny Odessa into the image of a city fallen into decline. The features of the image of Odessa man regarded as indications of the declining culture are determined in the article.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Stepanova
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Dnipro, Alfred Nobel University
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The articles attempts at the reconstruction of the image of America in letters and memoirs of Dmytro Chyzhevs’kyy, Yuriy Shevel’ov, and Wiktor Weintraub, East‑European scholars who after WWII greatly contributed to the formation of the image of Slavic civilization in the West. They immigrated to the US in late 1940s – early 1950s expecting Harvard to be the site for their further academic endeavours since the after – WW II Europe could not satisfy their academic needs. Interaction with the American academic community developed differently for each scholar, which had its impact on their further careers. Impressions from America and Harvard in particular in their correspondence generally testifies to the their hopes and expectations, while memoirs contain a balanced or even distanced re‑evaluation of those. Historical context within which these writings are viewed suggests that for each scholar the image of America was dynamic and different due to their age, personality, character, previous immigrant life experience, and their cultural background and academic worldview. Unlike Chyzhevs’kyy, these factors suited well Shevel’ov and Weintraub in terms of adjustment to the reality and expectations of the New World. Further study of these scholars’ biographies from this perspective seems particularly topical under the circumstances of recent reformatting of the Slavic Studies as a discipline.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oksana Błaszkiw
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo‑Humanistyczny w Siedlcach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Since the end of the 2010s, there has been an autofiction boom in Russian prose. The heroes of this literary cross‑genre are artistic projections of the authors, similar while at the same time not similar to their creators. This article presents the female protagonists of two of the most notable autofiction novels of recent years – There Was No Adderall in the Soviet Union (2017) by Olga Breininger and Wound (2021) by Oksana Vasyakina. In addition, the article describes the different life path trajectories of the young heroines. If the journey of Breininger’s artistic projection leads to self‑destruction, then the wanderings of Vasyakina’s artistic projection lead her home.
Go to article

Bibliography

References:

«Literatura i zhiznʹ»: avtofikshn kak staryy novyy trend, [v:] https://www.youtube.com/wat·sh?v=t6rhnFLcrjk.

Altashina V.D., Autofiction v sovremennoy frantsuzskoy literature: lego iz ego, «Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federalʹnogo universiteta. Filologicheskiye nauki» 2014, № 3.

Berezina M., Nekrasova M., Nikonova A., Sotnikova D., Segodnya «pisʹmo – eto telo»: o zhenskom avtofikshene v Rossii, [v:] https://prochtenie.org/texts/30650.

Breyninger O., V Sovetskom Soyuze ne bylo adderola, [v:] V Sovetskom Soyuze ne bylo adderola [roman, rasskazy], Moskva 2018.

Bystrova T.A., Geroy sovremennogo italʹyanskogo romana‑avtofikshn: skolʹzheniye po grani, «Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoye obrazovaniye» 2019, № 4 (36).

Delaume C., La Règle du Je. Autofiction: un essai, Paris 2010.

Ferreira‑Meyers K., Autobiography and Autofiction: No Need to Fight for a Place in the Limelight, There is Space Enough for Both of these Concepts, [in:] Writing the Self. Essays on Autobiography and Autofiction, ed. by K.W Shands, G.G. Mikrut, D.R. Pattanaik, K. Ferreira‑Meyers, Huddinge 2015.

Kun M., Postsovetskaya kazakhstanskaya nemka kak idealʹnyy material dlya sozdaniya «sverkhcheloveka» (o romane Olʹgi Breyninger «V Sovetskom Soyuze ne bylo adderola»), «Sibirskiy filologicheskiy forum» 2019, № 3 (7).

Lejeune P., Le pacte autobiographique, Paris 1975.

Levina‑Parker M., Vvedeniye v samosochineniye: autofiction, «Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye» 2010, № 3, [v:] https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2010/3/vvedenie‑v-samosochinenie‑autofiction.html.

NOS – 2021, [v:] http://www.prokhorovfund.ru/projects/own/108/4433/.

Pisareva E., Oksana Vasyakina: «Dlya menya printsipialʹno nazyvatʹ svoye pisʹmo zhenskim», [v:] https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/03/28/oksana‑vasiakina‑dlia‑menia‑printsipialno-nazyvat‑svoe‑pismo‑zhenskim.

Pozdnyakova K., Rozhdennaya v SSSR, [v:] https://portal‑kultura.ru/articles/books/166059-rozhdennaya‑v‑sssr/.

Stryjakowska A., Powieść В Советском Союзе не было аддерола Olgi Breininger z perspektywy autofikcji, „Przegląd Rusycystyczny” 2020, nr 3 (171).

Vasyakina O., Rana, Moskva 2021.

Yuzefovich G., «Rana» Oksany Vasyakinoy – roman o perezhivanii utraty. Avtor proshchayetsya s materʹyu i rassuzhdayet o tom, kak ona povliyala na eye samootsenku, gomoseksualʹnost’ i videniye mira, [v:] https://meduza.io/feature/2021/07/03/rana‑oksany-vasyakinoy‑roman‑o‑perezhivanii‑utraty.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michael Kuhn
1

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Since modern Slavic studies lack a uniform concept of the Ukrainian redaction of the Church Slavonic language, this article analyzes the major achievements of Ukrainian linguistics in the study of this phenomenon. Applying the method of linguistic historiography, the author describes the emergence of a national concept, according to which written sources – reflecting the features of the Ukrainian language from different periods of its formation – attest to the existence of a single Ukrainian redaction. The development of views on the Church Slavonic language is evidenced by the works of M. Maksymovych, I. Ohienko, G.Y. Shevelov, V. Nimchuk. Today different schools are primarily concerned with the quantitative interpretation of particular features of the Ukrainian redaction. Such an interpretation is largely premised on the 19th‑century Russian philological tradition which does not take into consideration the historical differentiation of East Slavic. Burdened with problematic terms like Russian, such an approach remains in contrast with Ukrainian linguistics, which accepts the existence of the Ukrainian redaction of Church Slavonic since the times of Kyivan Rus’.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Halyna Naienko
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Łódź, Uniwersytet Łódzki
  2. Kyiv, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article deals with the history of competition and standardization between the variants од‑/ від‑ (both as preposition and prefix) in the Ukrainian language. Historically they are related to different groups of dialects. In the southwestern dialectal zone, with the exception of the northern dialects of the Volyn and Carpathian areas, the variant від‑ prevails, while the variant од‑ is predominant in the north of the country. The variant од‑ was typical for standard Ukrainian of the 19th‑early 20th century. After a period of competition with від‑ it lost out because of the artificial limitation of its use. This happened in the early 20th century due to the desire to employ forms that would give the literary language a national character, since the від‑ variant is notably different from both Polish and Russian. The history of од‑/ від‑ competition is investigated on the material of dictionaries, 1920s’ grammars and modern linguistic research. The history of од‑/ від‑ preposition and prefix variants was researched as well within the Ukrainian language corpus, which includes texts from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Shown are the points of variation related to regional and chronological properties, to authors’ individual preferences and to certain lexemes.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Liudmyla Dyka
1
Maria Shvedova
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of prevention in the preservation and development of idioms in the multilingual territory between the Dniester and the Danube rivers, based on the sociolinguistic situation of the region, the language and educational policy in the area and their dynamics, and a search for a solution. The goal involves modeling forecasts (possible development vectors) of the ethnolinguistic situation within the investigated area, in order to be able to avoid negative scenarios, but to move along the path of its harmonious development, to find tools and measures for its constructive management. It is considered that the problems preventing the preservation of this continuum’s linguistic diversity, as well as the development of idioms in a multilingual environment, are caused by both internal (problems of effective implementation of the language and educational policy of Ukraine) and external factors. In order to ensure the preservation and development of the area’s idioms, some negative, unfavorable scenarios in the development of the ethnolinguistic and political situation were modeled. In our opinion, a number of measures should be taken to prevent the ethno‑linguistic situation from developing along such destructive vectors. First of all, it is necessary to form, in some ways reanimate, a positive image of the Ukrainian Language, at least – it should not be perceived by minorities as an imposed language. If the Ukrainian authorities do not have an understanding of this necessity, the European Union could influence the resolution of many partial issues with the linguistic life of the region.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrii Kolesnykov
1
ORCID: ORCID
Maryna Deliusto
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Izmail State University of Humanities
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article substantiates the importance of using an interdisciplinary approach to the study of language personality. A variety of scientific concepts about the content, level model and structural‑component composition of the linguistic persona are demonstrated; information on the formation of this phenomenon in the field of related humanities, in particular in the relationship of linguistics, literature, psycholinguistics, psychology, medicine. Within the framework of psycholinguistics, classifications of language personality depending on normative or specific speech are distinguished. Traced is the migration of the term ‘accentuation’ from medicine to linguistics.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Vitaliia Papish
1

  1. Uzhhorod National University
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper focuses on artifact denominations – compound idiomatic phrases that encode the information on a person’s anthropometric characteristics (those of body, virtues, behavior, etc.) in artifact‑naming items (based on the Ukrainian, Polish and English languages). The study elaborates on the system of significative and denotative descriptors – two‑component entities that represent a metaphoric mapping of the source (significative descriptors) and target (denotative descriptors) domains. The significative descriptors are reduced to the classes of the artifact signifiers; among those are the classes of clothes, household articles, food, weapon, facilities, transport and symbols. The denotative descriptors represent the classes of the artifact signified; among those are the classes of a person’s social, value‑based and semiotic characteristics. The ultimate goal of the study is to characterize regular relations between the two classes of descriptors in the contrasted languages. The analysis provided in the paper proceeds from the assumption that any artifact‑naming process takes place on the basis of extended stereotyping – a cognitive mechanism that provides for the encoding of additional, complementary senses in artifact‑naming items. The study concludes that artifact‑naming processes in the Ukrainian, Polish and English languages respond to the communities’ demands for representing a person’s internal, spiritual world within the concept of external material objects (artifacts). The analysis reveals the tendency of artifact designations towards a social, axiological and semiotic conceptualization of a person’s artifact world.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oleh Demenchuk
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Rivne State University of the Humanities
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article characterises the artistic language of Vasily Shukshin, laying special emphasis on the role of dialectisms in his short stories, as well as in literature in general. However, the main focus of the article is to point out and analyse the types of equivalents that were used in the Polish renditions by the following translators: I. Bajkowska, Z. Gadzinianka, J. Landesberg, K. Latoniowa, T. G. Lipszyc, E. Niepokólczycka, J. Olszowska, I. Piotrowska, B. Reszko, D. Rymsza‑Zalewska, I. Szpak, A. Wolnicka. Translators utilise various translation equivalents but they do not fully recreate the qualities of the original units. Translators predominantly tend to convey the denotative meaning. As a result translations lose the local flavour of a Siberian village.
Go to article

Bibliography

References:

Alekseyeva I., Vvedeniye v perevodovedeniye, Sankt‑Peterburg, Moskva 2004.

Bayramova T.F., «Kak budto perom vytaskivayu iz bumagi zhivyye golosa lyudey…» Osobennosti yazyka prozy Vasiliya Makarovicha Shukshina, [v:] http://www2.bigpi.biysk.ru/wwwsite/viewpage.php?page_id=262.

Chesnokova V.A., Yazyk Shukshina kak obʺyekt perevoda, [v:] Tvorchestvo V.M. Shukshina: entsiklopwdicheskiy slovarʹ‑spravochnik, nauch. red. A.A. Chuvakin, Barnaul: Izdatelʹstvo Altayskogo universiteta 2004, t. 1.

Dejna K., W sprawie tzw. dialektów kresowych, „Język Polski” 1984, nr LXIV.

Fedorov A.I., Sibirskaya dialektnaya frazeologiya, Novosibirsk 1980.

Fedorov A.V., Osnovy obshchey teorii perevoda (lingvisticheskiye problemy), Sankt‑Peterburg 2002.

Gak V.G., «Koverkaniye» ili poddelka, [v:], Tetradi perevodchika, red. L.S. Barkhudarov, Moskva 1966, vyp. 3.

Gierczyńska D., Z zagadnień przekładu rosyjskiej „prozy wiejskiej” na język polski, „Słupskie Prace Humanistyczne” 1996, nr 15a.

Gorn V.F., Vasiliy Shukshin: Lichnostʹ. Knigi, Barnaul 1990.

Intervʹyu s sozdatelem slovarya russkikh govorov Altaya Lyudmiloy Shelepovoy, [v:] https://altapress.ru/afisha/story/intervyu‑s‑sozdatelem‑slovarya‑russkih‑govorov‑altaya‑lyudmiloy-shelepovoy‑106055.

Handke K., Terytorialne odmiany polszczyzny, [w:] Współczesny język polski, red. J. Bartmiński, Lublin 2001.

Komissarov V.N., Sovremennoye perevodovedeniye. Uchebnoye posobiye, Moskva 2002.

Kozinkina O.O., Razgovornaya leksika kak osobaya cherta poetiki V.M. Shukshina, [v:] http://www.pglu.ru/upload/iblock/4fd/uch_2014_vi_08.pdf.

Levitskiy R., K voprosu o perevode dialektnoy i prostorechnoy leksiki, „Przegląd Rusycystyczny” 1985, z. 3 (27).

Lewicki R., Przekład wobec zjawisk podstandardowych. Na materiale polskich przekładów współczesnej prozy rosyjskiej, Lublin 1986.

Lewicki R., Zagadnienia lingwistyki przekładu, Lublin 2017.

Marszałek M., Dialektyzmy dońskie w rosyjsko‑niemieckiej perspektywie leksykograficznej, Bydgoszcz 2002.

Pawlak E., Wasilij Szukszyn, Warszawa 1981.

Rylʹskiy M., Isskustvo perevoda: statʹi, zametki, pisʹma, Moskva 1986.

Shanskiy N.M., Leksikologiya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka, Moskva 1972.

Shelepova L., Leksika russkikh govorov Altaya na slavyanskom fone (po materialam „Istoriko‑etimologicheskogo slovarya russkikh govorov Altaya”), „Vestnik NGU” 2012, t. 11.

Shveytser A.D., Teoriya perevoda, Moskva 1988.

Terlecka M.K., Problem ochrony i reintrodukcji popielicy w Polsce, Krosno 2012.

Tołkaczewski F., Samobytnostʹ Shukshina po‑angliyski (k voprosu o perevode okkazionalizmov), „Slavia Orientalis” 2019, nr 2.

Vinogradov V.S., Perevod: Obshchiye i leksicheskiye voprosy: Uchebnoye posobiye, Moskva 2004.

Vlakhov S., Florin S., Neperevodimoye v perevode, Moskva 1980.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Filip Tołkaczewski
1

  1. Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Instructions for authors

Rules for getting published in the Slavia Orientalis

I. The Slavia Orientalis quarterly accepts manuscripts that have not been published previously. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, ghostwriting and guest authorship will be treated as an act of research misconduct. Editorial Board will document all forms of ethical violations and scientific misconduct and shall notify appropriate institutions about them.

The manuscript sent to the Editorial Board should be accompanied by the following statement of originality:

“I declare that the article ………………… (Title) submitted for publication in the Slavia Orientalis quarterly has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Date ………………… Signature ………………………….”

There is no peer review fee and no publication fee. Once the paper is published, the authors will be receiving a free print copy of the journal’s issue containing their article.

II. Slavia Orientalis publishes articles in Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Polish and English.

III. Please attach to the text Polish, English, Russian version of the title, English summary (up to 0,5 page), five English key words, a signed statement of originality, short information about the author, containing the following data: name and surname, title or academic degree, place of employment (including address) and position, correspondence address, e-mail, titles of the most important publications (books and articles), with an indication of the year and place of publication (5 items).

IV. In addition to the articles the Editorial Board also publishes:
a) Substantive, evaluative and polemical reviews (up to 5 typescript pages);
b) Information on books (up to 2 typescript pages);
c) Session or scientific conference reports (up to 3 typescript pages).

V. Technical requirements:
a) electronic text (in rtf and pdf format) should be sent to: slavia-orientalis@uj.edu.pl;
b) texts in English should begin with a brief (about a half page in length) summary either in Russian or Polish;
c) texts in Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian should begin with a brief (about a half page in length) summary in English;
d) in Polish and English texts, please provide quotations and footnotes in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian in the original (not in transliteration);
e) titles of works appearing in the Polish text for the first time should be given in parentheses in the original version (not in transliteration);
f) typescript should have appropriate spacing and margin on the left side;
g) font style: Times New Roman (CE or CYR), font size: 12 points, spacing: 1.5;
h) a standard page contains 30 lines with approximately 60 characters per line (1,800 characters per page with spaces);
i) articles should not exceed the prescribed character limit (40,000 characters with spaces);
j) footnotes should be listed at the bottom of the page (numbered continuously) by “Insert footnote” option;
k) articles should be provided with a reference list. Bibliography, for all languages that use Cyryllic script, should be transliterated into the Latin script according to the BGN/PCGN system (US Board on Geographic Names / Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British Official Use). Transliteration can be done online, e.g. in the Transliteration program https://www.translitteration.com by selecting the appropriate language option (Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian).
l) When listing bibliography, please follow the samples presented below:

Book:
J. Kowalski, Historia literatury, Kraków 1990, s. 23.
Ibidem, s. 13.
J. Kowalski, Historia..., s. 56.


Book excerpt:
A. Nowak, Z dziejów piśmiennictwa, [w:] Historia cywilizacji, Warszawa 1987, s. 98.
Ibidem, s.13.
A. Nowak, Z dziejów..., s. 135.


Journal article:
L. Nowacka, Teoria aktów mowy, „Przegląd Językoznawczy” 1963, nr 7, s. 45.

Internet sources:
I. Yazykova, Obraz Bogurodzicy w ruskiej ikonografii, [w:] https://www.ortodox.ru (28.03.2011).

VI. Any substantive changes introduced by the Author after the manuscript has been set up for type will be made at the expense of the Atuthor.

VII. The Editorial Board does not return unsolicited manuscripts.

VIII. Text should be prepared according to the example provided below:

Name and Surname
City, address of Author’s institution



ORIGINAL TITLE

English title



ABSTRACT:
KEYWORDS:

Text of paper

References

Publication Ethics Policy


Publication ethics

The Slavia Orientalis quarterly adheres to the principles presented in the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The rules of conduct concern in particular:

I. Duties of Authors
1. Authors are obliged to diligently prepare the articles for publication in the Slavia Orientalis, in accordance with the rules in force.
2. By submitting the material for publication in the Slavia Orientalis quarterly, the Author warrants that the article is his/her original work, has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere, and that it does not infringe third-party intellectual property rights.
3. The Author assumes responsibility for the credibility and proper documentation of the information provided in the article.
4. Authors are obliged to take the comments from the Reviewers into account or to justify their refusal in writing.
5. After the article is accepted for publication, the Author signs a publication agreement with the Editorial Board under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND free access license.

II. Rules of the Editorial Board
1. The Slavia Orientalis quarterly accepts manuscripts that have not been published previously. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, ghostwriting and guest authorship will be treated as an act of research misconduct. Editorial Board will document all forms of ethical violations and scientific misconduct and shall notify appropriate institutions about them. In the event of a confirmed scientific misconduct, disclosed after the publication of the text, the Editorial Board will provide relevant information.
2. Only high scientific value of the work, its reliability and linguistic correctness will be taken into account when reviewing and qualifying texts for publication. The Editorial Board shall respect the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest.
3. Editorial Board may refuse to publish the manuscript if it does not agree with the Author’s reaction to the reviews.
4. The correspondence between members of the Editorial Board, members of the Scientific Council and Authors or Reviewers shall be treated as confidential.

III. Duties and responsibilities of the Scientific Council
1. Advising the Editorial Board on issues related to the scientific level of the quarterly.
2. Paying attention to observed cases of scientific dishonesty.
3. Proposing new research issues, e.g. Eastern Slavonic languages, to include in the journal’s future publishing projects.
4. Providing opinion on ideas proposed by the Editorial Board for publication in special issues.
5. Concern for the recognition and scientific prestige of the quarterly in the international scientific community.

IV. Duties of Reviewers
1. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.
2. Reviews should contain an explicit recommendation whether to accept or reject the paper for publication.
3. The Reviewer is obliged to notify the Editorial Board about any case of plagiarism in the reviewed text.

Peer-review Procedure


Procedure for reviewing scientific articles in the quarterly Slavia Orientalis

1. Submitted material is initially evaluated by the Editorial Board in terms of meeting all formal requirements and its compliance with the journal’s scientific and thematic profile.

2. Reviews are prepared on the peer review form.

3. In the process of reviewing the following rules are followed:
a) the principle of two independent reviews;
b) the principle of selecting reviewers on the basis of their expertise;
c) the principle of avoiding the conflict of interest in the selection of reviewers;
d) the principle of double blind peer review;
e) the principle of appointing a third reviewer in the event of contradictory reviews.

4. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit.

Download Peer review form of the article


Reviewers

Recenzenci (2020-2021)

Augustyn, Leszek, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Banaszkiewicz, Magdalena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Bartmiński, Jerzy, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Bacewicz, Florij, prof. dr hab., Lwowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Iwana Franko

Bahdanowicz Iryna, prof. dr, Białoruski Uniwersytet Państwowy, Mińsk

Barszt, Konstantin, prof. dr hab., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej RAN (Dom Puszkinowski), (Sankt Petersburg)

Bednarczyk, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Beley, Oleh, dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Betko, Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

Bobilewicz Grażyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Bohun, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Cierniak, Urszula, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie

Coghen, Monika, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Charciarek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Czerwiński Grzegorz, dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Czerwiński, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Dobieszewski, Janusz, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Drozdowski, Mariusz, dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Duć-Fajfer, Helena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Dudek-Szumigaj, Agnieszka, dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Fałowski, Adam, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Flis-Czerniak, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Fontański, Henryk, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Gadomski, Aleksander, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Opolski

Ginter, Anna, dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Głuszkowski, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Grabowicz George, prof. dr, Uniwersytet Harvarda (Cambridge, MA)

Grzybowski, Stefan, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Habrajska, Grażyna, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Horniatko-Szumiłowicz, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Juda, Celina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Jusupović, Adrian - dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Historii PAN (Warszawa)

Kaleta Radosław, dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Kapuścik, Jerzy, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Kochanek, Piotr, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Kojder, Marcin, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Komendová, Jitka, doc. Mgr. Ph.D, Uniwersytet Palackiego w Ołomuńcu

Komisaruk Ewa, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Komorowska, Ewa, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Kodzis, Bronisław, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Kononenko Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Korniejenko, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Korzeniowski, Mariusz, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Kosmeda Tetiana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Kościelniak, Krzysztof, ks. prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Kotyńska Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Kowalow, Siergiej, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Kowalska-Paszt, Izabela, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Kozak, Stefan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Krasowska, Helena, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Kuczyńska, Marzanna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Kuffel, Józef, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Leszczak, Oleg, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Leśniewski, Krzysztof, prof. dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Lewicki, Roman, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Lewkijewskaja, Jelena, prof. dr hab., Rosyjski Państwowy Uniwersytet Humanistyczny (Moskwa)

Lubocha-Kruglik, Jolanta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Madyar, Olha, Madyar, doc. Mgr. CSc., Uniwersytet Preszowski

Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Marszałek, Marek, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Masłowska, Ewa, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Matusiak, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Mianowska, Joanna, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Mironowicz, Antoni, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Moklak, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Moser, Michael, Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Dr. h. c. Prof. h. c., Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Moskwin, Andriej, dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Mucha Bogusław, em. prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Mytnik, Irena, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Ndyae, Iwona, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

Nefagina, Galina, prof. zw., dr hab., Akademia Pomorska w Słupsku

Nikołajew, Siergiej, prof., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej (Dom Puszkinowski) RAN, Sankt Petersburg

Nowak Alicja, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Oboleńska, Diana, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Ostrowski, Bogumił, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie

Pełczyński, Grzegorz, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Pliouchanowa, Marija, prof. dr, Uniwersytet w Peruggii

Poliszczuk, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Radyszews’kyi, Rostysław, prof. dr hab., Kijowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Tarasa Szewczenki

Rak, Maciej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Ranczin, Andriej, prof. dr hab., Moskiewski Uniwersytet Państwowy im. M. Łomonosowa

Rembiszewska, Dorota, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Romaniuk, Switłana, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Roszko, Roman, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Instytut Slawistyki PAN (Warszawa)

Selart, Anti, prof. dr, Uniwersytet w Tartu

Siatkowski, Janusz, em. prof. zw. dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN, Warszawa

Sidor, Monika, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Simonek, Stefan, Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr., Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Siryk, Ludmiła, dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Skotnicka, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Sobol, Walentyna, prof. zw. dr hab. Uniwersytet Warszawski

Stach, Grażyna, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Stachowski, Marek, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Styczyński, Marek, em. prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Szczerbowski, Tadeusz, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie

Szmiher, Taras, doc. dr hab., Lwowski Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Iwana Franko

Tarkowska, Joanna, dr hab, prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Titarenko, Swietłana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet w Sankt Petersburgu

Tiupa, Walerij, prof. dr hab., Rosyjski Państwowy Uniwersytet Humanistyczny (Moskwa)

Toporkow, Andriej, prof. dr hab., Instytut Literatury Światowej im. M. Gorkiego RAN (Moskwa)

Trojanowska, Beata, dr hab. prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Trzeszczyńska Patrycja, dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Twaranowicz, Halina, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Tyrpa, Anna, prof. dr hab., Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN (Kraków)

Tyszkowska-Kasprzak, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Weretiuk, Oksana, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Rzeszowski

Wierzbiński, Jarosław, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Winogradowa, Ludmiła, dr hab., Instytut Słowianoznawstwa RAN (Moskwa)

Wojan, Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Woźniak, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

Zeldowicz, Gennadij, prof. dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Żyłko, Bogusław, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Gdański





Recenzenci (2015-2019)

Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Bacewicz, Florij, prof., Uniwersytet Lwowski

Bednarczyk, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Betko, Iryna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski

Bezwiński, Adam, prof. zw. dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Charciarek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Śląski

Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. zw., dr hab. UMCS w Lublinie

Diec, Joachim, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Dudek, Andrzej, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Fałowski, Adam, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Fast, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Śląski

Głuszkowski, Michał, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Gołębiowska-Suchorska, Agnieszka, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Grzybowski, Stefan, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Kiklewicz, Aleksander, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski

Kowalska-Stus, Hanna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Korytkowska, Małgorzata, prof. zw., dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN

Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Kowalczyk, Witold, dr hab., prof. UMCS, Uniwersytet Marii Curie -Skłodowskiej

Ksenicz, Andrzej, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski

Łucewicz, Ludmiła, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki

Marszałek, Marek, dr hab. prof. uczelni Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Mikiciuk, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Gdański

Mozer, Michael, prof., Instytut Slawistyki, Uniwersytet w Wiedniu

Nikołajew, Siergiej, prof., Instytut Literatury Rosyjskiej (Dom Puszkinowski)

Orłowski, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Pluskota, Teresa, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Przebinda, Grzegorz, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Ranczin, Andriej, prof., Moskiewski Uniwersytet im. M. Łomonosowa

Raźny, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Stawarz, Barbara, dr hab., prof. UP, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie

Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Trojanowska, Beata, dr hab. Prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego

Waligórska-Olejniczak, Beata, dr hab., prof. uczelni, Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza

Wawrzyńczyk, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Wołodźko-Butkiewicz, Alicja, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

Woźniak, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski


Recenzenci (2012-2014)


Bartwicka, Halina, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Bednarczyk, Anna, dr hab., prof. UŁ, Uniwersytet Łódzki
Cymborska-Leboda, Maria, prof. zw., dr hab. Uniwersyey Marii Curie-Skłodowskie
Chlebda, Wojciech, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski
Czyżewski, Feliks, prof. dr hab. UMCS w Lublinie
Diec, Joachim, dr hab., prof. UJ, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Duda, Katarzyna, dr hab., prof. UJ, Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Dudek, Andrzej, dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Fałowski, Adam, prof.dr hab. Uniwersyetet Jagielloński
Fast, Piotr, prof. zw., dr hab., Wyższa Szkoła Lingwistyczna w Częstochowie
Kiklewicz, Aleksander, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski
Korytkowska, Małgorzata, prof. zw., dr hab., Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Kościołek, Anna, dr hab., prof. UMK, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
Kowalczyk, Witold, dr hab., prof. UMCS, Uniwersytet Marii Curie -Skłodowskiej
Kozak, Stefan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Laszczak, Wanda, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Opolski
Łucewicz, Ludmiła, prof.zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Majmieskułow, Anna, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Malej, Izabella, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Małek, Eliza, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki
Mędelska, Jolanta, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Mianowska, Joanna, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Mikiciuk, Elżbieta, dr hab., prof. UG, Uniwersytet Gdański
Mozer, Michael, prof., Instytut Slawistyki, Uniwersytet w Wiedniu
Orłowski, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Pluskota, Teresa, dr hab., prof. UKW, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Ranczin, Andriej, prof., Moskiewski Uniwersytet im. M. Łomonosowa
Raźny, Anna, prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Rieger, Janusz, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Stawarz, Barbara, dr hab., prof. UP, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie
Suchanek, Lucjan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Wawrzyńczyk, Jan, em. prof. zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski
Wołodźko-Butkiewicz, Alicja, prof.zw., dr hab., Uniwersytet Warszawski

 

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more