Humanities and Social Sciences

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN

Content

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2025 | Tom 20

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes the theological, historical, and ecclesial significance of the First Council of Nicaea (325 CE) in the context of its 1700th anniversary. The author discusses in detail the heresy of Arianism, which denied Christ's divinity and His consubstantiality with the Father, posing a serious threat to Christian soteriology. The text emphasizes the crucial role of St. Athanasius the Great who, despite his youth and diaconal status, became the main defender of the orthodox doctrine of the Holy Trinity. The genesis of synodality in the Church is also presented, referring to the Apostolic Council as the prototype for collegial resolution of dogmatic disputes. The author portrays the 4th century as a paradoxical period of both the flourishing of patristic thought and intense theological controversies, emphasizing that true theology served not academic specula-tion but the salvation of the faithful.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Pańkowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Chrześcijańska Akademia Teologiczna w Warszawie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the First Universal Council of Nicaea I (325) as a watershed moment in the formation of Christian doctrine and Church structures. In order to present the topic more fully, the political and religious context in the Roman Empire during the reign of Constantine, his vision of the unity of Church and State, and the main reasons for convening the Council are also discussed. The choice of venue, the proceedings, Constantine's personal involvement, the final decisions of the Council Fathers and the implications of the Council for the Eastern and Western Church are then presented. The study uses the method of analysing selected historical sources from the fourth and fifth centuries, including the writings of Socrates Scholasticus, Sozomen, Philostorgius and Theodoret of Cyr, supplemented by the synodal records of the Eastern and Western Church. The conclusions show the great importance of the council in unifying doctrine and strengthening imperial authority in the affairs of the Church. The Council Fathers condemned Arius and formulated the first dogma of the faith, the wording of which was anti‑Arian. The question of the date of Easter was also discussed, and twenty stipulations on the rules of conduct and internal order of the Church were adopted.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Piechocka-Kłos
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Warmińsko‑Mazurski w Olsztynie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

During the first centuries of the Church, persecutions of Christians led some of them to renounce their faith. Their acts of apostasy were undertaken for various reasons. After the persecutions had ended, the lapsed Christians wanted to return to the Church; hence first at the synods, a legislation was established specifying the conditions under which the return of those who had lapsed was possible. The first Ecumenical Council, held in 325 in Nicaea, addressed the issue of apostates in four disciplinary canons. They undoubtedly constituted a summary of the previous synodal legislation, which was to apply to the entire Church from the Council of Nicaea. An analysis of the conciliar and synodal canons related to the issue of those who lapsed allows us to unequivocally conclude that those who sincerely wanted to return to the community of the faithful were not rejected, but were given the opportunity to do penance. Those who had departed at the point of death were not denied the Eucharist. The clergy who had been ordained after denying their faith were deposed and placed among the laity. Those laymen who lapsed were subjected to appropriate penances in accordance with earlier practices, and the same was done to those who were undergoing the catechumenate. It should be stated with full certainty that the penance assigned to the apostates by the Council of Nicaea as well as by the early synods and bishops, although severe, lasting about twelve years, was nevertheless an act of God’s mercy towards converting sinners.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bogdan Czyżewski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the year of the round anniversary of the First Council of Nicea, it is important to reflect on the significance of this event not only for the past, but also for the present. The beginning of the fourth century after Christ was a very difficult stage in the history of the Church, marked by a crisis similar to the one we are experiencing today. The purpose of the article is to answer the question of how the momentous event of the First Council of Nicea can help overcome the crisis of our time, how in such a spiritual atmosphere, in which the Church finds itself today, it is possible to educate in the faith and lead to its knowledge. To answer these questions, the author zooms in on the historical background of the events of 1700 years ago, formulates a series of questions posed by Catholics today, and, drawing on the legacy of Ratzinger and Müller in particular, indicates how theology responds to these questions and what challenges this raises for practical theology.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Tomasik
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Kardynała Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

On the anniversary of the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea, this article explores the Christological emphasis and implications of accepting the religious truth that Christ is consubstantial with the Father. It examines how this truth has shaped – and continues to shape – the pastoral ministry of hope today. In this Holy Year Pope Francis has called for a common pilgrimage of hope. Drawing on the insights of the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, we seek to understand hope within both individual and communal life. At the same time, we explore the religious dimension that hope unveils through Ricoeur’s perspective. The incarnation of Jesus Christ as fully divine directs our attention to the significance of corporeality. We can only be pilgrims of hope through the body. This understanding is further connected to the Church’s synodal journey, which embraces all the baptized. Finally, we integrate the philosophical and sacramental perspectives on hope with the bodily dimension of the religious truth about Christ as affirmed by the Council of Nicaea. In doing so, we advocate for a pastoral ministry that encompasses the full reality of the human person.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janez Vodičar
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersity of Ljubljana/Slovenia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This text is a contribution to the reflections on the Christian faith, presented on the occasion of the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea (325 CE). The aim of the paper is to expound the promise of God as the content of the Christian faith that can dynamize the lives of believers in the modern era. It characterizes the culture of tempor-ariness and the theology of the promise of God, referring mainly to the teachings of Pope Francis, Joseph Ratzinger and Jürgen Moltmann. Based on theological analyses of the Christian faith, its context and content, detailed principles of living the promise of God have been formulated. Particular stages of the reflection have been synthesized to formulate final conclusions. Living the promise of God today unites human existence threatened by individualism and the lack of integration of the past, present and future. Consequently, it renews the Christian hope shared by individuals and communities.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bogdan Kulik
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article explores the divine lordship of Jesus Christ in the Lukan corpus, focusing on the theological and narrative function of the title Kyrios (Lord) in the narrative of Luke–Acts. Luke articulates Jesus’ divine identity through relational and functional ca-tegories rooted in Israel’s Scriptures. Beginning with the infancy narratives, the study traces the gradual and deliberate application of the title Kyrios to Jesus, culminating in Peter’s proclamation at Pentecost that God has made Jesus “both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36). The narrative demonstrates how Jesus assumes divine roles – such as forgiving sins, bestowing the Spirit, and receiving prayer – while maintaining his filial relationship to the Father. Acts further portrays Jesus’ lordship first, through his resurrection, exalta-tion, and second, through the Spirit‑empowered mission to all nations. The article argues that Luke presents a high Christology that affirms Jesus’ participation in the divine identity. Thus, the narrative Christology of Luke–Acts offers a foundational witness to the Church’s later doctrinal affirmation: that Jesus Christ is truly Lord and God, worthy of worship and obedience.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Matjaž Celarc
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. University of Ljubljana/Slovenia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article proposes to elucidate the concept of truth before difficulties that arise in contemporary philosophy of science. Many modern philosophers reduce the conception of truth to verifiability and the practical applicability of propositions. Such a conception adequately accounts for the results of scientific research but fails to account for the nature of truth as such. Thomas Aquinas defined truth not simply in terms of propositions but as adaequatio intellectus et rei. This notion profoundly affects Thomas’s conception of beatitude as the intellectual vision of God as supreme Truth. The intellect in this life anticipates that vision by participating in the Divine Intellect. In Fides et Ratio, Pope St. John Paul II emphasizes the centrality of truth in the human person’s search for the meaning of life, a search in which partial answers do not suffice. In his search for meaning, the person relies not only on his own research but also on beliefs received from others. Indeed, to believe is to entrust oneself to another. The paradigmatic instance of this is the act of belief in Jesus Christ. In his Theology of the Body, John Paul II points also the knowledge of husband and wife in their sexual union by which a new person may come into existence. The meaningfulness of this union of man and woman is founded on the spousal meaning of the body. Hence, truth is to be found in the personal intercom-munications among his rational creatures, a communication founded ultimately upon dialogue with the Creator.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adrian Joseph Reimers
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Holy Cross College, South Bend, IN, USA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show changes in moral reasoning, depending on whether it is based on metaphysics or ontology. The method used is an analysis of changes in the history of philosophy relating to the basic metaphysical concept, which is the truth of things. The paper shows why modern philosophy rejected this concept and with it the entire classical metaphysics. Its place has been taken by ontology, which is not concerned with learning about being (with what is), but it is reflection on the conditions of its existence. The result of the reflection undertaken here is to show what the difference is within the framework of practical syllogism, if the place of Aristotelian nous (which is knowledge of a metaphysical nature) is replaced by reflection of an ontological nature. Metaphysics plays a very large role in moral reasoning. Thanks to it (and especially thanks to the truth of things), human cognition and the related moral reasoning have also a very important theological dimension.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Kraj
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Samuel Parker, a seventeenth‑century Anglican clergyman, is known today mainly for his polemics on church policies, church‑state relations, and the problem of tolerance. This article concentrates on his lesser‑known but considerable contribution to the emerging field of physico‑theology, which used the orderliness of nature as proof of God’s existence and His attributes. Parker proposed such a proof using ancient science and the science of his times, concentrating on the regularities in the solar system, the makeup of the earth, particularly its waters, the variety and complexity of the animal kingdom, and the intricate makeup of the human body. He considered these investigations as a necessary theological background to bolster his polemics. This included the moral and eschatological conse-quences: the recognition of an omnipotent and just God should inspire people to follow God’s rules of conduct in both personal and social settings, with the expectation of a fitting reward in the afterlife. Nevertheless, although his legacy remains largely overshadowed by his controversial political stances, Parker’s substantial and foundational contributions to physico‑theology should be acknowledged and appreciated.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adam Drozdek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Duquesne University (USA)
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Die Arzt‑Patient‑Beziehung ist die Grundlage der ärztlichen Praxis. Auch die spiri-tuelle Betreuung von Patienten ist ein wesentlicher Aspekt im Umgang mit Krankheit und Leiden. Beide Elemente der Patientenversorgung haben das gleiche Ziel: Hilfe im Hei-lungsprozess. Ein wichtiger Aspekt guter Versorgung ist die erfolgreiche Kommunika-tion. In schwierigen Situationen ist es wichtig, sich auf Empathie und Zusammenarbeit mit dem Kranken zu konzentrieren, um eine erfolgreiche Kommunikation zu erreichen. Durch sie muss der Betreuende in der Lage sein, den Willen des Patienten zu hören. Die narrative Medizin leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zum Verständnis der Erzählung des Patienten, wenn er über seine Krankheit spricht. Dieser Artikel konzentriert sich auf diesen Aspekt des Zuhörens, um die Wünsche der Patienten und ihren Beitrag zur Ver-sorgung in ihrer Krankheit verstehen zu können. Auf diese Weise nehmen Patienten diese Haltung des Zuhörens als Respekt für ihre Person wahr. Ziel des Artikels ist es, einen konstruktiven Beitrag zur Diskussion über eine gute Arzt‑Patient‑Beziehung zu leisten.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karl Hunstorfer
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Universität Wien, Austria

Instructions for authors

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

Before you submit your article, review or report for publication in the journal Studies in Theological Sciences, please read the requirements for authors of texts.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TEXT TO BE SUBMITTED AND HOW IT SHOULD BE EDITED

PRINCIPLES OF PREPARING FOOTNOTES AND EDITING APPENDIX BIBLIOGRAPHY
RULES FOR REDACTING SUMMARY AND KEY WORDS
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING A BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE

If the text of the article (review, report) has been edited in accordance with the rules adopted by the editorial board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences", please register/log in at the following address: https://www.editorialsystem.com/snt and then follow the instructions on the page.

Authors can follow the text qualification process on their account on the Editorial System Platform (link as above).

The journal does not charge any publication fees (APCs), submission fees, or any other associated charges at any stage of the editorial or publishing process.

In all matters related to the publication of the text, you can contact the editorial office of Studies in Theological Sciences: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → CONTACT


Publication Ethics Policy

PRINCIPLES OF PUBLISHING ETHICS
that the editors of "Studies in Theological Sciences" apply, are in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics):

According to these guidelines, not only the authors, but all those involved in the publication process are required to respect ethical standards in the publication of the article.

1. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE AUTHOR

Authorship of publications: The author of a publication is the person who made a significant contribution to its conception, execution and final interpretation of the data. Anyone who influenced these elements of the work should be listed among the authors.
Scientific integrity: The publication should be prepared meticulously according to the guidelines of the Editorial Board. It must contain data to identify sources and a clear, transparent presentation of information. The bibliography should present all publications used in writing the article.
Originality and plagiarism: the author is obliged to conduct, present and interpret scientific research honestly and objectively. The author may submit only his own and original work for publication. Submission of an article for publication is understood as a declaration that the text has not been published anywhere before, including in electronic form, and that it is not submitted to the editorial boards of other journals or is not an excerpt from a compact publication, such as a monograph (the rule of exclusion of multiple or simultaneous publication). Plagiarism, self-plagiarism or falsification of data in a scientific article is unacceptable. The editors use the iThenticate anti-plagiarism program to check the originality of texts submitted for publication http://www.ithenticate.com/ Information about errors in published texts: The author should immediately notify the editor-in-chief of the journal if he notices significant errors in his publication. In cooperation with the editor-in-chief and the publisher, an errata, an addendum, a correction should be published or the publication should be withdrawn.

2. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO EDITORS

Monitoring of ethical standards: The editors are responsible for adhering to the highest ethical standards of the journal's publication process. To this end, it keeps a constant check on all activities at every stage of publication, and prevents abuses if necessary.

Transparency and openness (principle fair play): Submitted articles are evaluated by the Editorial Board only on their merits. The evaluation is not affected by such factors as race, sex, religion, origin, citizenship, political views of the authors, etc.

Publication decisions: The editors, after reviewing the reviews, make the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. In making its decision, it takes into account such factors as the scientific value of the paper, the originality of the treatment of the problem, clarity and compliance with the scope of the journal.

Principle of confidentiality: The editors are obliged to maintain confidentiality with regard to data on papers submitted for publication and their authors. Only the author, reviewers (with a double blind review procedure in place), the editor-in-chief, the editor in charge of the issue or responsible for the article, and the publisher have information about the article.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Articles not intended for publication may not be used by the editors in any way and for any purpose that infringes the author's intellectual property. Authors should inform the Editor about the sources of funding for publication, contributions from scientific research institutions, associations and other entities (financial disclosure).

Scientific integrity: The editors are responsible for the ethical and substantive level of the journal and therefore have the right to verify the data in the submitted article and make corrections, if necessary.

A barrage ghost writing i guest autorship: The Editorial Board conducts the selection of submitted articles in accordance with the principles of preventing cases of scientific dishonesty, such as ghost authorship, courtesy authorship, guest authorship, etc. In order to counteract similar cases, the Editorial Board requires authors to present the authors' contribution to the publication (with additional affiliation and attribution of authorship to different parts of the publication); the main responsibility for the content lies with the author submitting the article.

Text withdrawal: In the case of suspected fraudulent practices, the Editorial Board is obliged to withdraw the text from publication and take clarification and corrective steps. Detection of ethical malpractice (plagiarism, falsification of research results, manipulation of research results, method, fabrication of research results, etc.) should be reported in writing to the editor-in-chief of the journal (marian.machinek@gmail.com) or to the secretary of the journal (mateusz.krawczyk@pan.pl). A report can be made by a member of the editorial board, a reviewer, a reader of the journal or any other person who has suspicions about the integrity of the text. In the case of an ethical violation in a text already published, the editors will withdraw the article from the website, posting information about the reasons for the withdrawal, and in the case of a printed text, the editors will include an appropriate statement in the next issue of the journal. The editors will inform the author, the affiliated institution, the reviewers, the aggrieved persons, and, if necessary, other ethical regulators of the case. If the ethical malpractice in the text is insignificant, the corrected text will be allowed to be republished. If there is a conflict of interest within the Editorial Board, a report should be submitted to the Publisher (wydawca.snt@gmail.com).

Complaints and appeals: Complaints against the Journal and/or the Editorial Board should be in writing and, when they concern the Journal or the conduct of members of the Editorial Board, they should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief; when they concern the conduct of the Editor-in-Chief, they should be addressed to the Publisher - the Committee on Theological Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences (wydawca.snt@gmail.com) and brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief. Supervision of the Publisher is exercised by the Dean of the Division I of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences (wydzial_1@pan.pl). The subject of the complaint may be, for example: violated interests of the complainant, negligence, protraction or inaction in the case by the Editorial Board. The complainant should receive written notification of the handling of the case within 30 days from the date of the complaint.

3. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE REVIEWER

Text evaluation criteria: The reviewer assesses the compatibility of the subject matter covered with the profile of the journal, whether the title reflects the content of the article, and whether the article is an original text. The reviewer evaluates the article in terms of form (linguistic correctness, structure of the argument, correctness in the formulation of footnotes) and content (methodological correctness, completeness of the theses presented, factual correctness, timeliness of the bibliography used). The reviewer should briefly justify his assessment. The review must contain a clear conclusion including a recommendation for publication of the article.

Principle of confidentiality: The reviewer is obliged to treat the reviewed article as a confidential document. He can inform only those authorized to do so about it. The review procedure is done anonymously, which means that the author and reviewers do not know each other's identity (double blind review).

The principle of objectivity: The reviewer pays attention only to the merits of the publication. He does not judge or criticize the author. In the review he tries to be objective. He presents the evaluation of the article with clear arguments.

The principle of responsibility for the timeliness of the review process: A reviewer who agrees to review an article is responsible for completing his or her work by the deadline agreed upon with the Editor.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Conflicts of interest may be relationships of professional subordination, economic dependence, and such forms of social relations that may affect the impartial evaluation of the value of the text. All information and scientific concepts obtained as a result of the review procedure may not be used for the personal benefit of the reviewer. The reviewer may not be a person directly involved in the creation of the publication.

Peer-review Procedure

REVIEW PROCEDURE

The review procedure used in the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" is in accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education contained in the publication Good practices in review procedures in science, Warsaw 2011 and the Announcement of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of June 2, 2015 on the criteria and procedure for evaluating scientific journals.

Before agreeing to write a review, the reviewer should familiarize himself/herself with the PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS FOR REVIEWERS: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICATION ETHICS.

Upon receipt of an article destined for the ARTICLES or VARIA sections, the Editorial Board performs a preliminary evaluation of the text submitted by the author, leading to a decision to accept it for further processing (or reject it). The author may also be asked to fill in missing data in his submission. After the decision to pre-qualify the submitted article, the Editorial Board initiates the review procedure, sending the text to two independent reviewers, of which it immediately notifies the author.

The list of reviewers is not fixed, but the Editor appoints them depending on the subject matter of the texts sent. As a result, the reviewers are experts on the subject of the submitted text. The review process is anonymous, the reviewer and the author of the article do not know each other's identities (the so-called double blind review).

Accepting the text for review, the reviewer undertakes to complete it by the specified deadline. After reviewing the text of the submitted article, the reviewer fills out a review form, assessing the article both from the formal (structure, language, style, footnotes) and substantive (correctness of the argumentation, originality and completeness of the thesis) side.

The reviewer should justify his assessment and make any recommendations to the author. The review should contain a clear conclusion in the form of a recommendation to accept, reject or send the text back to the author for corrections and additions. Two reviews with a negative recommendation lead to rejection of the article. In the case of significant discrepancies in the recommendations of the first two reviewers, the Editor refers the text to a third reviewer, whose recommendation is decisive for the further fate of the article.

On the basis of the review, the Editorial Board decides whether to finally accept the article for publication, reject it or send it back to the author for corrections. The Editorial Board immediately informs the author of the decision, giving him the opportunity to read the review texts as well. To the more serious comments of reviewers, the author of the article should respond in detail. All comments of reviewers should be taken into account in the correction of the work. Correspondence between the author and reviewers is carried out through the Editor.

In consultation with the author, the Editorial Board performs stylistic proofreading of the text of the accepted article, with the aim of eventually producing a version of the text ready for publication.

The materials contained in the REVIEWS AND REVIEWS section are not strictly scientific articles and therefore, as a rule, are not subject to the evaluation of external reviewers, although they may be referred to them. The decision to publish or reject them is made by the Editorial Board.

Reviewers

REVIEWERS


19 (2024)

Prof. Dr Piotr Adamek, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan
Prof. UŚ Dr Hab. Antoni Bartoszek, Uniwersytet Śląsk in Katowice, Poland
Prof. UŚ Dr Hab. Bogdan Biela, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach, Poland
Prof. Dr Hab. Jacek Błeszyński, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego in Warszawa,  Poland
Prof. Dr Hab. Janusz Bujak, Uniwersytet Szczeciński in Szczecin, Poland
Prof. US Dr Hab. Grzegorz Chojnacki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński in Szczecin, Poland
Prof. dr Zbigniew Formella,  Università Pontificia Salesiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. UPS Dr Hab. Sylwia Góra,  Uniwersytet Pomorski in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Dr Hab. Krzysztof Góźdź, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II in Lublin, Poland
Prof. Dr Dariusz Kowalczyk, Pontificia Università Gregoriana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Dr Hab. Janusz Kucicki, Nagoya University, Japan
Prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Kupisiński, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II in Lublin, Poland
Prof. KUL dr hab. Janusz Lekan, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II in Lublin, Poland
Prof. Dr Hab. Wiesław Łużyński, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika in Toruń, Poland
Prof. UAM Dr Hab. Maciej Olczyk, Uniwersytet im Adama Mickiewicza in Poznań, Poland
Doc. Dr Marcel Mojzeš, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Slovakia
Prof. Dr Hab. Jan Perszon, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika in Toruń, Poland
Prof. UO Dr Hab. Janusz Podzielny, Uniwersytet Opolski in Opole, Poland
Prof. PWT Dr Hab. Roman Słupek, Papieski Wydział Teologiczny in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Dr Innocenzo-Mária Vladimír Szaniszló, Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d’Aquino (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Dr Peter Volek, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. KUL Dr Hab. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II in Lublin, Poland



18 (2023)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Barth, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dola, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Maurizio Faggioni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Radoslav Lojan, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Merecki SDS, The Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II for Marriage and the Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, Holy Cross College, South Bend, USA
Prof. Stanisław Jan Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Marek Rembierz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Skobel, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Robert Skrzypczak, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College & Seminary, Cromwell, USA
Prof. Stefano Zamboni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Zawadzki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

17 (2022)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Paweł Borto, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland Prof. Martin Carbajo-Núñez, Pontifical University of St. Anthony (Antonianum), Rome, Italy
Prof. David Fagerberg, University of Notre Dame, USA
Prof. Bogdan Ferdek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Cristiana Freni, Salesian Pontifical University, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zygfryd Paweł Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Guzowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Vlaho Kovačević, University of Split, Croatia
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Miotk SVD, Rome, Italy
Prof. Andrzej Adam Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Piotr Piasecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Jan Polak, Palacký, University Olomouc, Czech Republic
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, University of Saint Thomas, USA
Prof. Roman Słupek SDS, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Adam Józef Sobczyk, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrea Vicini SJ, Boston College, USA
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Ray Zammit, L-Università ta' Malta, Malta

16 (2021)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Aszyk, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Bohdanowicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Piotr Duchliński, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ivo Džinić, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Prof. Zygfryd Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Daniel Justel, Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso: Madrid, Spain
Prof. Stephan Kampowski, Pontifical John Paul II Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontifical University of. St. Anthony (Antonianum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
PhD Roman Mazur, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Paweł Podeszwa, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Proniewski, University of Bialystok, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Thomas Rego, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile
Prof. Adrian Reimers, University of St. Thomas, USA
Prof. Czesław Rychlicki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Siemieniec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. med. Władysław Sinkiewicz, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
Prof. Damian Wąsek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. João J. Vila-Chã, Pontifical Gregorian University (Gregoriana) in Rome, Italy
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College and Seminary, USA

15 (2020)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland PhD René Balák, Slovakia
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Paweł Bortkiewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ladislav Csontos, Trnava University, Slovakia
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. John Grabowski, Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Collegium Bobolanum in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. René Micallef, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ireneusz Mroczkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Kazimierz Papciak, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Ian Randall, Cambridge, UK
Prof. Jarosław Różański, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Szyszka, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Dominic White, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
PhD Agnes Wilkins, Worcester, UK
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Krzysztof Penderecki Academy of Music in Krakow, Poland

14 (2019)

Prof. Grzegorz Bachanek, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. James Corkery, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tomasz Dutkiewicz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zygfryd Gläser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Adam Kalbarczyk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ewelina Konieczna, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Jarosław Merecki, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Józef Naumowicz, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, Italy
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wodka, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy

13 (2018)

PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Roman Buchta, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Joseph Carola, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Wiesław Dąbrowski, Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose „Fides et Ratio”, L`Aquila, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Cyril Hišem, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Cayetana Heidi Johnson - Universidad en Internet de México, Mexico
Prof. Przemysław Kantyka, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Kałużny, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
PhD Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontificia Universita Antonianum, Rome, Italy
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Rudolf Kutschera, John Felice Rome Center/Loyola University Chicago, Rome, Italy
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Linke, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Moskałyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Pawłowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Romuald Piekarski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Aleksander Prokopski, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
PhD Paweł Sambor, l'Institut Catholique de Paris, France
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Manfred Uglorz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

12 (2017)

PhD Mojżesz Asaah Awinongya SVD, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule in Sankt Augustin, Germany
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Achim Buckenmaier, Pontifical Lateran University, Rome, Italy
PhD Andrzej Dobrzyński, Center for Documentation and Research of the Pontificate of John Paul II in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Ledwoń, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Francisco José López Sáez, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain.
Prof. Michael J. Mikoś, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, USA
Prof. Leszek Misiarczyk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mieczysław Ozorowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ignacio Serrada Sotil, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Religiosas, Spain
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ralph Weimann, Domuni Universitas, Bruksela, Belgium
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wierciński, University of Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec, Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

11 (2016)

PhD Anna Abram, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
PhD Stanisław Bazyliński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Konrad Glombik, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Massimo Grilli, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Marek Karczewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Witold Kawecki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wolfgang Klausnitzer, Julius-Maximilians-Universität of Würzburg, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
PhD Edmund Kowalski, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Myszor, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Obirek PhD Sean Ryan, University of London, UK
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Wojciech M. Stabryła, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Szram, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Uciecha, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

10 (2015)

Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Edward Wiszowaty, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Cristian Sonea, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jürgen Werbick, Universität Münster, Germany
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Michael Gabel, Universität Erfurt, Germany
Prof. Wojciech Gajewski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Sikora, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Roman Siebenrock, Universität Innsbruck, Austria Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Michał Wojciechowski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Józef Urban, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pietrzak, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland Prof. Artur Malina, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Piotr Perzyński, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

9 (2014)

Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Józef Bunar, Facultad de Teología “San Pablo”, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marcin Hintz , Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Alberto Mingo Kaminouchi, Institute Superior de Ciencias Morales, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Krystian Kałuża, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Kaucha, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kiciński, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Marek Kita, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marek Lis, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Gerhard Marschütz, Universität Wien, Austria Prof. Erwin Mateja, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz , University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piepke, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule SVD St. Augustin, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Piwowarczyk, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland Prof. Roland Preis
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Marek Skierkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Wiśniewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec - Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy

8 (2013)

Prof. Roman Bogacz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Clemens Breuer, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule St. Pölten, Austria
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Dziadosz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wacław Gubała, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Kochel, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Łabuda, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Janiec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Konecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Antoni Misiaszek, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Misiurek, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piegsa, Universität Augsburg, Germany
Prof. Marek Raczkiewicz, Accademia Pontificio, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

6-7 (2011-2012)

Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krystian Wojaczek, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland


Plagiarism Policy

ANTI-PLAGIARISM POLICY

Anti-plagiarism system: Plagiarism is an infringement of personal copyright by appropriating all or part of another's work and publishing it under one's own name. Copying one's own work to expand one's academic output constitutes self-plagiarism. Plagiarism is a criminal act.

If plagiarism is detected, the editors will inform the institution where the author is affiliated, the reviewers and the affected persons of the case. In addition, the editors will post information on this issue on the journal's website and/or in the printed version.

In order to prevent plagiarism, the Editorial Board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" uses iThenticate software belonging to Turnitin, a global provider of technology services for science and education. The system allows checking the alleged similarity of a text with billions of online sources and texts deposited by publishers using Similarity Check. All submitted articles are automatically checked for plagiarism using dedicated detection software before the review process begins.

Research data: The editors do not collect research data, and submission of a research data management plan is not a requirement for publication of an article. By research data, the editors mean recorded material of a factual nature (in numerical, textual, graphical or audio form) that is generally recognized by the scientific community as necessary for evaluating the results of scientific research. Under certain circumstances, however, authors may be asked to provide research data, even after the article has been published.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more