Applied sciences

Archive of Mechanical Engineering

Content

Archive of Mechanical Engineering | 2019 | vol. 66 | No 2

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Similarity assessment between 3D models is an important problem in many fields including medicine, biology and industry. As there is no direct method to compare 3D geometries, different model representations (shape signatures) are developed to enable shape description, indexing and clustering. Even though some of those descriptors proved to achieve high classification precision, their application is often limited. In this work, a different approach to similarity assessment of 3D CAD models was presented. Instead of focusing on one specific shape signature, 45 easy-to-extract shape signatures were considered simultaneously. The vector of those features constituted an input for 3 machine learning algorithms: the random forest classifier, the support vector classifier and the fully connected neural network. The usefulness of the proposed approach was evaluated with a dataset consisting of over 1600 CAD models belonging to 9 separate classes. Different values of hyperparameters, as well as neural network configurations, were considered. Retrieval accuracy exceeding 99% was achieved on the test dataset.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] T. Funkhouser, P. Min, M. Kazhdan, J. Chen, A. Halderman, D. Dobkin, and D. Jacobs. A search engine for 3D models. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 22(1):83–105, 2003. doi: 10.1145/588272.588279.
[2] Y. Yang, H. Lin, and Y. Zhang. Content-based 3-D model retrieval: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37(6), 1081–1098, 2007. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905756.
[3] N. Iyer, S. Jayanti, K. Lou, Y. Kalyanaraman, and K. Ramani. Three-dimensional shape searching: State-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 37(5):509–530, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2004.07.002.
[4] Z. Zhang, Z. Jiang, and X. Wang. Biased support vector machine active learning for 3D model retrieval. In: 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, pages 89–92, Wuhan, China, 26–28 June, 2010. doi: 10.1109/MACE.2010.5535431.
[5] H. Cheng, C. Chu, E.Wang, and Y. Kim. 3D part similarity comparison based on levels of detail in negative feature decomposition using artificial neural network. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 4(5):619–628, 2007. doi: 10.1080/16864360.2007.10738496.
[6] B. Bustos, D.A. Keim, D. Saupe, T. Schreck, and D.V. Vranic. Feature-based similarity search in 3D object databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(4):345–387, 2005. doi: 10.1145/1118890.1118893.
[7] J.R. Koza, F.H. Bennett, D. Andre, and M.A. Keane. Automated design of both the topology and sizing of analog electrical circuits using genetic programming. In: J.S. Gero, F. Sudweeks, editors, Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96, pages 151–170, Springer, Dordrecht, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0279-4.
[8] V.B. Sunil and S.S. Pande. Automatic recognition of machining features using artificial neural networks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(9–10):932–947, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1536-z.
[9] A.C. Müller and S. Guido. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: A Guide For Data Scientists. O’Reilly Media Inc., 2016.
[10] Z. Qin, J. Jia, and J. Qin. Content based 3D model retrieval: A survey. In: 2008 International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, pages 249–256, London, UK, 18–20 June, 2008. doi: 10.1109/CBMI.2008.4564954.
[11] H.J.Rea, J.R. Corney, D.E.R. Clark, J. Pritchard, M.L. Breaks, and R.A. MacLeod. Part-sourcing in a global market. Concurrent Engineering, 10(4):325–333, 2002. doi: 10.1177/a032004.
[12] J. Corney, H. Rea, D. Clark, J. Pritchard, M. Breaks and R. MacLeod. Coarse filters for shape matching. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(3):65–74, 2002. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2002.999789.
[13] P. Cicconi, R. Raffaeli, and M. Germani. An approach to support model based definition by PMI annotations. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 14(4):526–534, 2016. doi: 10.1080/16864360.2016.1257194.
[14] G. Cybenko, A. Bhasin, and K.D. Cohen. Pattern recognition of 3D CAD objects: towards an electronic yellow pages of mechanical parts. International Journal of Smart Engineering Systems Design, 1(1):1–13, 1997.
[15] Z. Li, X. Zhou, and W. Liu. A geometric reasoning approach to hierarchical representation for B-rep model retrieval. Computer-Aided Design, 62:190–202, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.008.
[16] M. Kazhdan, T. Funkhouser, and S. Rusinkiewicz. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors. In: Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, pages 156–164, 2003.
[17] M. El-Mehalawi and R.A. Miller. A database system of mechanical components based on geometric and topological similarity. Part I: representation. Computer-Aided Design, 35(1):83–94, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00177-4.
[18] M. El-Mehalawi and R.A. Miller. A database system of mechanical components based on geometric and topological similarity. Part II: indexing, retrieval, matching, and similarity assessment. Computer-Aided Design, 35(1):95–105, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00178-6.
[19] C.F. You and Y.L. Tsai. 3D solid model retrieval for engineering reuse based on local feature correspondence. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 46(5–8):649–661, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00170-009-2113-9.
[20] H. Kaparthi and N.C. Suresh. A neural network system for shape-based classification and coding of rotational parts. International Journal of Production Research, 29(9):1771–1784, 1991. doi: 10.1080/00207549108948048.
[21] J. Shih, C. Lee, and J.T. Wang. A new 3D model retrieval approach based on the elevation descriptor. Pattern Recognition, 40(1):283–295, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.034.
[22] Y. Gao, M. Wang, Z.J. Zha, Q. Tian, Q. Dai, and N. Zhang. Less is more: efficient 3-D object retrieval with query view selection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 13(5):1007–1018, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2011.2160619.
[23] Z. Zhu, C. Rao, S. Bai, and L.J. Latecki. Training convolutional neural network from multidomain contour images for 3D shape retrieval. Pattern Recognition Letters, 119:41–48, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2017.08.028.
[24] Scikit-learn, documentation.
[25] S. Knerr, L. Personnaz, and G. Dreyfus. Single-layer learning revisited: a stepwise procedure for building and training a neural network. In: F.F. Soulie and Jeanny Herault, editors, Neurocomputing: Algorithms, Architectures and Applications, pages 41–50, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
[26] Y. Bengio. Learning Deep Architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends®in Machine Learning, 2(1):1–127, 2009. doi: 10.1561/2200000006.
[27] J. Patterson and A. Gibson. Deep Learning. A Practitioner’s Approach. O’Reilly Media Inc., 2017.
[28] M.A. Nielsen. Neural Networks and Deep Learning. Determination Press, 2015.
[29] D.P. Kingma and J.Ba. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, 7–9 May, 2015.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dawid Machalica
1
Marek Matyjewski
2

  1. Warsaw Institute of Aviation, Warsaw, Poland.
  2. Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw, Poland.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Automation of earth moving machineries is a widely studied problem. This paper focusses on one of the main challenges in automation of the earth moving industry, estimation of loading torque acting on the machinery. Loading torque acting on the excavation machinery is a very significant aspect in terms of both machine and operator safety. In this study, a disturbance observer-assisted control system for the estimation of loading torque acting on a robotic backhoe during excavation process is presented. The proposed observer does not use any acceleration measurements, rather, is proposed as a function of joint velocity. Numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme in tracking the reaction torques for a given dig cycle. Co-simulation experiments demonstrate robust performance and accurate tracking of the proposed control in both disturbance torque and position tracking. Further, the performance and sensitivity of the proposed control are also analyzed through the help of performance error quantifiers, the root-mean-square (RMS) values of the position and disturbance tracking errors.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] R.C. Winck, M. Elton, and W.J. Book. A practical interface for coordinated position control of an excavator arm. Automation in Construction, 51:46–58, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.12.012.
[2] D. Wang, L. Zheng, H. Yu, W. Zhou, and L. Shao. Robotic excavator motion control using a nonlinear proportional-integral controller and cross-coupled pre-compensation. Automation in Construction, 64:1-6, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.024.
[3] H. Feng, C. Yin, W. Weng, W. Ma, J. Zhou, W. Jia, and Z. Zhang. Robotic excavator trajectory control using an improvedGAbased PID controller. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 105:153–168, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.014.
[4] P. Saeedi, P.D. Lawrence, D.G. Lowe, P. Jacobsen, D. Kusalovic, K. Ardron, and P.H. Sorensen. An autonomous excavator with vision-based track-slippage control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13(1):67–84, 2005. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2004.838551.
[5] D. Kim, J. Kim, K. Lee, C. Park, J. Song, and D. Kang. Excavator tele-operation system using a human arm. Automation in Construction, 18(2):173–182, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.002.
[6] J. Yoon and A. Manurung. Development of an intuitive user interface for a hydraulic backhoe. Automation in Construction, 19(6):779–790, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.04.002.
[7] S. Dadhich, U. Bodin, and U. Andersson. Key challenges in automation of earth-moving machines. Automation in Construction, 68:212–222, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.009.
[8] Y. Liu, M.S. Hasan, and H.-N. Yu. Modelling and remote control of an excavator. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 7(3):349–358, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s11633-010-0514-8.
[9] S. Kim, J. Park, S. Kang, P.Y. Kim, and H.J. Kim.Arobust control approach for hydraulic excavators using μ-synthesis. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 16(4):1615–1628, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s12555-017-0071-9.
[10] Q.H. Nguyen, Q.P. Ha, D.C. Rye, and H.F. Durrant-Whyte. Force/position tracking for electrohydraulic systems of a robotic excavator. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, volume 5, pages 5224–5229, Sydney, Australia, 12-15 Dec. 2000. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2001.914787.
[11] Q. P. Ha, Q.H. Nguyen, D.C. Rye, and H.F. Durrant-Whyte. Impedance control of a hydraulically actuated robotic excavator. Automation in Construction, 9(5-6):421–435, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00056-X.
[12] Q. Ha, M. Santos, Q. Nguyen, D. Rye, and H. Durrant-Whyte. Robotic excavation in construction automation. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 9(1):20–28, 2002. doi: 10.1109/100.993151.
[13] S.E. Salcudean, S. Tafazoli, P.D. Lawrence, and I. Chau. Impedance control of a teleoperated mini excavator. In 1997 8th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Proceedings. ICAR’97, pages 19–25, Monterey, USA, 7-9 July 1997. doi: 10.1109/ICAR.1997.620156.
[14] S. Tafazoli, S.E. Salcudean, K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, and P.D. Lawrence. Impedance control of a teleoperated excavator. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, 10(3):355–367, 2002. doi: 10.1109/87.998021.
[15] M.D. Elton and W.J. Book. Comparison of human-machine interfaces designed for novices teleoperating multi-DOF hydraulic manipulators. In 2 011 RO-MAN Symposium, pages 395–400, Atlanta, USA, 31 July – 3 Aug. 2011. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005250.
[16] M.E. Kontz. Haptic Control of Hydraulic Machinery Using Proportional Valves. Ph.D Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA, 2007.
[17] B. Frank, L. Skogh, R. Filla, A. Fröberg, and M. Alaküla. On increasing fuel efficiency by operator assistant systems in a wheel loader. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies and Integration, pages 155–161, Changchun, China, 2012. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3129.1362.
[18] H. Cannon and S. Singh. Models for automated earthmoving. In Experimental Robotics VI, pages 163–172, Springer, London 2000. doi: 10.1007/BFb0119395.
[19] M.W. Spong and M. Vidyasagar. Robot Dynamics and Control. John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
[20] M. Bodur, H. Zontul, A. Ersak, A.J. Koivo, H.O. Yurtseven, E. Kocaoglan, and G. Pasamehmetoglu. Dynamic cognitive force control for an automatic land excavation robot. In Proceedings of MELECON ’94. Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, pages 703–706, Antalya, Turkey, 12-14 April 1994. doi: 10.1109/MELCON.1994.380908.
[21] A.J. Koivo, M. Thoma, E. Kocaoglan, and J. Andrade-Cetto. Modeling and control of excavator dynamics during digging operation. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 9(1):10–18, 1996. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1996)9:1(10).
[22] S. Li, J. Yang, W.H. Chen, and X. Chen. Disturbance Observer Based Control: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, 2014.
[23] S. Mohan and J. K. Mohanta. Dual integral sliding mode control loop for mechanical error correction in trajectory-tracking of a planar 3-PRP parallel manipulator. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 89(3-4):371–385, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10846-017-0553-2.
[24] S. Mohan. Error analysis and control scheme for the error correction in trajectorytracking of a planar 2PRP-PPR parallel manipulator. Mechatronics, 46:70–83, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.07.003.
[25] G.J. Maeda, I.R. Manchester, and D.C. Rye. Combined ILC and disturbance observer for the rejection of near-repetitive disturbances, with application to excavation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 23(5):1754–1769, 2015. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2014.2382579.
[26] W.H. Chen, D.J. Ballance, P.J. Gawthrop, and J. O’Reilly. A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 47(4):932–938, 2000. doi: 10.1109/41.857974.
[27] D. Sosa-Méndez, E. Lugo-González, M. Arias-Montiel, and R.A. García-García, ADAMSMATLAB co-simulation for kinematics, dynamics, and control of the Stewart–Gough platform. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 14(4), 2017. doi: 10.1177/1729881417719824.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Meera C S
1
Mukul Kumar Gupta
1
Santhakumar Mohan
2

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun (UK), India.
  2. Discipline of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Palakkad (Kerala), India.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A brief review of the existing autonomous underwater vehicles, their types, design, movement abilities and missions is presented. It is shown, the shape optimization design and enhancement of their efficiency is the main problem for further development of multipurpose glider technologies. A comparative study of aerodynamic performance of three different shape designs (the airfoil NACA0022 based (I), flattened ellipsoidal (II) and cigar-type (III) bodies of the same volumes) has been carried out. Geometrical modelling, meshing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been carried out with AnSys15.0. The pathlines and wall shear stress distributions have been computed to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each shape. The lift and drag coefficients, aerodynamic quality, power index and pitching moment have been computed. The higher efficiency of the shape I/shape II at higher/lower angles of attack (> 20o and < 20o) has been found. The shape III develops high speeds at the same angles of attack and has higher manoeuvrability at relatively low aerodynamic quality. The comparative analysis of the flow capabilities of studied autonomous undersea vehicles proposes some design improvement for increasing their energy efficiency and flow stability.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] F. Muttin. Umbilical deployment modeling for tethered UAV detecting oil pollution from a ship. Applied Ocean Research, 33(4):332–343, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2011.06.004.
[2] D. Meyer. Glider Technology for ocean observations: a review. Ocean Science Discussions, 1–26, 2016. doi: 10.5194/os-2016-40.
[3] S. Ruiz, B. Garau, M. Martinez-Ledesma, B. Casas, A. Pascual, G. Vizono, J. Bouffard, E. Heslop, A. Alvarez, P. Testor, and J. Tintoré. New technologies for marine research: five years of glider activities at IMEDEA. Scientia Marina, 76:261–270, 2012. doi: 10.3989/scimar.03622.19L.
[4] M.C. Domingo. An overview of the internet of underwater things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35:1879–1890, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.07.012.
[5] J. Yuh, G. Marani, and D.R. Blidberg. Applications of marine robotic vehicles. Intelligent Service Robotics, 4:221–231, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11370-011-0096-5.
[6] E. Gray. The Devil’s Device: Robert Whitehead and the history of the Torpedo. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 1991.
[7] N.D. Kraus. Wave glider dynamic modeling, parameter identification and simulation. PhD Thesis, University of Hawaii, 2012.
[8] J.G. Graver. Underwater gliders: dynamics, control and design. PhD Thesis, Princeton University, NJ 08544, 2005.
[9] H. Stommel. The Slocum Mission. Oceanography, 2(1):22–25, 1989. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.1989.26.
[10] J. Sherman, R.E. Davis, W.B. Owens, and J.Valdes. The autonomous underwater glider “Spray”. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 26(4):437–446, 2001. doi: 10.1109/48.972076.
[11] C.C. Eriksen, T.J. Osse, R.D. Light, T. Wen, T.W. Lehmann, P.L. Sabin, J.W. Ballard, and A.M. Chiodi. Seaglider: a long range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research. IEEE Journal on Oceanic Engineering, 26(4):424–436, 2001. doi: 10.1109/48.972073.
[12] M.Y. Javaid, M. Ovinis, T. Nagarajan, and F.B.M. Hashim. Underwater gliders: a review. MATEC Web of Conferences, 13:02020–5, 2014. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20141302020.
[13] D.C. Webb, P.J. Simonetti, and C.P. Jones. SLOCUM, an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 26(4):447–452, 2001. doi: 10.1109/48.972077.
[14] T.B. Curtin, J.G. Bellingham, J. Catipovic, and D.Webb. Autonomous oceanographic sampling networks. Oceanography, 6(3):86–94, 1993. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.1993.03.
[15] K. Kawaguchi, T. Ura, M. Oride, and T. Sakamaki. Development of shuttle type AUV ALBAC and sea trials for oceanographic measurement. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 178:657–665, 1995 (in Japanese). doi: 10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1995.178_657.
[16] S. Wood. Autonomous underwater gliders. In A.V. Inzartsev, Editor, Underwater Vehicles, chapter 26, pages 505–530, IntechOpen, 2009. doi: 10.5772/6718.
[17] D. Tsering. China deep-sea exploration: intention and concerns. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 13(1):91–98, 2017. doi: 10.1080/09733159.2017.1326570.
[18] Ø. Hasvold, N.J. Størkersen, S. Forseth, and T. Lian. Power sources for autonomous underwater vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 162(2):935–942, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.021.
[19] X. Wang, J. Shang, Z. Luo, L. Tang, X. Zhang, and J. Li. Reviews of power systems and environmental energy conversion for unmanned underwater vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4):1958–1970, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.016.
[20] S. Willcox, J. Manley, and S. Wiggins. The wave glider, an energy-harvesting autonomous surface vessel. Sea Technology, 50(11):29–32, 2009.
[21] T.B. Curtin, D.M. Crimmins, J. Curcio, M. Benjamin, and C. Roper. Autonomous underwater vehicles: trends and transformations. Marine Technology Society Journal, 39(3):65–75, 2005. doi: 10.4031/002533205787442521.
[22] S. Wang, C. Xie, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, W. Jie, and S.J. Hu. Harvesting of PEM fuel cell heat energy for a thermal engine in an underwater glider. Journal of Power Sources, 169(2):338–346, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.043.
[23] K. Isa, M.R. Arshad, and S. Ishak. A hybrid-riven underwater glider model, hydrodynamics estimation, and analysis of the motion control. Ocean Engineering, 81:111–129, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.02.002.
[24] M.S. Stewart and J. Pavlos. A means to networked persistent undersea surveillance. In Submarine Technology Symposium STS, pages 2–38, 2006.
[25] APL. The Applied Physics Laboratory Biennial 2007 Report, College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 2007.
[26] T. Praczyk and P. Szymak. Decision system for a team of autonomous underwater vehicles – Preliminary report. Neurocomputing, 74(17):3323–3334, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.05.013.
[27] M.Y. Javaid, M. Ovinis, F.B.M. Hashim, A. Maimun, Y.M. Ahmed, and B. Ullah. Effect of wing form on the hydrodynamic characteristics and dynamic stability of an underwater glider. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 9(4):382–389, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.010.
[28] Y. Singh, S.K. Bhattacharyya, and V.G. Idichandy. CFD approach to modelling, hydrodynamic analysis and motion characteristics of a laboratory underwater glider with experimental results. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2(2):90–119, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2017.03.003.
[29] C. Sun, B. Song, P. Wang, and X. Wang. Shape optimization of blended-wing-body underwater glider by using gliding range as the optimization target. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 9(6):693–704, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.12.003.
[30] S. Zhang, J. Yu, A. Zhang, and F. Zhang. Spiraling motion of underwater gliders: Modeling, analysis, and experimental results. Ocean Engineering, 60:1–13, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.023.
[31] D.C. Seo and C.D. Williams. CFD Predictions of drag force for a Slocum ocean glider. Technical Report no. TR-2010-07. NRC Canada, 2010. doi: 0.4224/17210700.
[32] K. Alam, T. Ray, and S.G. Anavatti. Design and construction of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Neurocomputing, 142:16–29, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.12.055.
[33] Z. Wang, J. Yu, A. Zhang, Y. Wang, and W. Zhao. Parametric geometric model and hydrodynamic shape optimization of a flying-wing structure underwater glider. China Ocean Engineering, 31(6):709–715, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s13344-017-0081-7.
[34] D. Gassier, J. Rebollo, and R. Dumonteil. Implementing a low-cost long-range unmanned underwater vehicle: the SeaDiver Glider. Technical Report, Calhoun Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, 2007.
[35] D. Leandri, V. Nikishov, J.P. Frachet, T. Mathia, Y. Rudnyev, and E. Philippova. Undersea gliders for long-range applications. In O. Limarchenko, editor, Hydrodynamics of Moving Objects. Proceedings of the International Workshop, pages 142–153, Kiev, 2013.
[36] T. Melin. Parametric Airfoil Catalog. Part II. Göttingen 673 to YS930: An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2013.
[37] R.E. Sheldahl, and P.C. Klimas. Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. Technical Report, Sandia National Laboratories, 1981. doi: 10.2172/6548367.
[38] W. Shyy, Y. Lian, J. Tang, D. Viieru, and H. Liu. Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[39] R.M. Hubbard. Hydrodynamics technology for an Advanced Expendable Mobile Target (AEMT). Technical Report no. 8013, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1980.
[40] AnSys Fluent User’s Guide. Release 15.0. SAS IP, Inc., 2013.
[41] C. Galiński, A. Dziubiński, and A. Sieradzki. Performance comparison of the optimized inverted joined wing airplane concept and classical configuration airplanes. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 63(3):455–470, 2016. doi: 10.1515/meceng-2016-0026.
[42] H. Schlichting. Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th edition, McGraw-Hill, 1979.
[43] M. Grossrubatscher. Pilot’s Reference Guide. 10th edition. PilotsReference.com, 2008.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anatoliy Khalin
1
Nataliya Kizilova
2

  1. V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  2. Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw, Poland.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents a simulation model of the hybrid magnetic bearing dedicated to simulations of transient state. The proposed field-circuit model is composed of two components. The first part constitutes a set of ordinary differential equations that describes electrical circuits and mechanics. The second part of the simulation model consists of parameters such as magnetic forces, dynamic inductances and velocity-induced voltages obtained from the 3D finite element analysis. The MATLAB/Simulnik softwarewas used to implement the simulation model with the required control system. The proposed field-circuit model was validated by comparison of time responses with the prototype of the hybrid magnetic bearing.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] G. Schweitzer and H. Maslen. Magnetic bearings, theory, design, and application to rotating machinery. Springer, 2009.
[2] L. Ji, L. Xu, and Ch. Jin. Research on a low power consumption six-pole heteropolar hybrid magnetic bearing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 49(8):4918–4926, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2238678.
[3] A. Piłat. Active magnetic suspension and bearing. In G. Petrone and G. Cammarata, Recent advances in modelling and simulation, chapter 24, pages 453–470. I-Tech Education and Publishing, 2008.
[4] A. Iordanidis, R. Wrobel, D. Holliday, and P. Mellor. A field-circuit model of an electrical gearbox actuator.